Granular Matter

, 20:5 | Cite as

Probing the boundary effect in granular piles

Original Paper
  • 139 Downloads

Abstract

We present in this paper a DEM study of the effect of boundary configuration on the formation of granular piles. We examine the macro and micro responses of granular piles formed in a two-wall boundary system consisting of a horizontal base and an inclined wall. The results show that the left inclined boundary wall does not exert a considerable impact on the angle of repose \(\alpha _{R}\) estimated by the right free surface of granular pile, but it has an obvious effect on the angle of repose \(\alpha _{L}\) obtained by the left free surface. We observe the shifting of pile apex to the left inclined wall, with the shift distance depending on the orientation angle \(\beta \) of inclined wall. The principal stress field of granular pile is characterized by two sub regions, in which the major principal stresses are oriented respectively in acute and obtuse angles relative to the horizontal axis. We propose an index \(\lambda \) relating to the distribution of the two sub regions of principal stress field, and identify a relationship between \(\lambda \) (\(=\,\sin \beta \)) and \(\beta \) to account for the effect of boundary configuration on the internal mechanical responses of granular pile. We also analyze the boundary responses at varying \(\beta \) values, and observe three modes for the friction mobilization along the inclined boundary wall, on the basis of which we preliminarily illuminate the effect of boundary configuration on the macro responses of granular piles.

Keywords

Granular pile Angle of repose Boundary effect Discrete element method Principal stress filed Force chain 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51209237) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 13lgpy05). He is also indebted to Dr. Zhaofeng Li, Dr. Weihai Yuan and Dr. Wei Zhang for the constructive discussions with them.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We here declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations which can inappropriately influence the work presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Aranson, I.S., Tsimring, L.S.: Patterns and collective behavior in granular media: theoretical concepts. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 641–692 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duran, J.: Sand, Powders, and Grains: An Introduction to the Physics of Granular Materials. Springer, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaeger, H.M., Nagel, S.R., Behringer, R.P.: Granular solids, liquids, and gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1259–1273 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savage, S.B.: Modelling and granular material boundary value problems. In: Herrmann, H.J., Hovi, J.-P., Luding, S. (eds.) Physics of Dry Granular Media, pp. 25–96. NATO Advanced Study Institute/Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nedderman, R.M.: Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vanel, L., Howell, D.W., Clark, D., Behringer, R.P., Clément, E.: Memories in sand: experimental tests of construction history on stress distributions under sandpiles. Phys. Rev. E 60, R5040–R5043 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geng, J., Longhi, E., Behringer, R.P., Howell, D.W.: Memory in two-dimensional heap experiments. Phys. Rev. E 64, 060301 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuiguel, L., Mullin, T., Rotter, J.M.: The effect of particle shape on the stress dip under a sandpile. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 028001 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robinson, D.A., Friedman, S.P.: Observations of the effects of particle shape and particle size distribution on avalanching of granular media. Physica A 311, 97–110 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matuttis, H.G.: Simulation of the pressure distribution under a two-dimensional heap of polygonal particles. Granul. Matter 1, 83–91 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matuttis, H.G., Luding, S., Herrmann, H.J.: Discrete element simulations of dense packing and heaps made of spherical and non-spherical particles. Powder Technol. 109, 278–292 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Y., Xu, Y., Thornton, C.: A comparison of discrete element method simulations and experiments for ‘sandpile’ composed of spherical particles. Powder Technol. 160, 219–228 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou, C., Ooi, J.Y.: Numerical investigation of progressive development of granular pile with spherical and non-spherical particles. Mech. Mater. 41, 707–714 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, J., Liang, Y., Zhou, Y.: The effect of the particle aspect ratio on the pressure at the bottom of sandpiles. Powder Technol. 234, 37–45 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, Z.Y., Zou, R.P., Pinson, D., Yu, A.B.: Angle of repose and stress distribution of sandpiles formed with ellipsoidal particles. Granul. Matter 16, 695–709 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dai, B.B., Yang, J., Zhou, C.Y.: Micromechanical origin of angle of repose in granular materials. Granul. Matter 19, 24 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dai, B.B., Yang, J., Zhou, C.Y., Zhang, W.: Effect of particle shape on the formation of sandpile. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Discrete Element Method, Dalian, China, pp. 767–776 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, J., Herrmann, H.J.: Angle of repose and angle of marginal stability: molecular dynamics of granular particles. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 26, 373–383 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luding, S.: Stress distribution in static two-dimensional granular model media in the absence of friction. Phys. Rev. E 55, 4720–4729 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, Y.C., Xu, B.H., Yu, A.B., Zulli, P.: Numerical investigation of the angle of repose of monosized spheres. Phys. Rev. E 64, 021301 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldenberg, C., Goldhirsch, I.: Friction enhances elasticity in granular solids. Nature 435, 188–191 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alonso, J.J., Hovi, J.P., Herrmann, H.J.: Lattice model for the calculation of the angle repose from microscopic grain properties. Phys. Rev. E 58, 672–680 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herrmann, H.J.: Statistical models for granular materials. Physica A 263, 51–62 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herrmann, H.J.: Granular matter. Physica A 313, 188–210 (2002)ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalman, H., Goder, D., Rivken, M., Ben-Dor, G.: The effect of the particle-surface friction coefficient on the angle of repose. Bulk Solids Handl. 13, 123–128 (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou, Y.C., Xu, B.H., Yu, A.B., Zulli, P.: An experimental and numerical study of the angle of repose of coarse spheres. Powder Technol. 125, 45–54 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grasselli, Y., Herrmann, H.J.: On the angle of dry granular heaps. Physica A 246, 301–312 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogale, S.B., Bathe, R.N., Choudhary, R.J., Kale, S.N., Ogale, A.S., Banpurkar, A.G., Limaye, A.V.: Boundary effects on the stability of thin submerged granular piles. Physica A 354, 49–58 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dury, C.M., Ristow, G.H.: Boundary effects on the angle of repose in rotating cylinder. Phys. Rev. E 57, 4491–4497 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Trollope, D.H., Burman, B.C.: Physical and numerical experiments with granular wedges. Géotechnique 30, 137–157 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee, I.K., Herington, J.R.: Stress beneath granular embankments. In: Proceedings in 1st Australia–New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, pp. 291–296. Melbourne (1971)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou, Y.C., Xu, B.H., Zou, R.P., Yu, A.B., Zulli, P.: Stress distribution in a sandpile formed on a deflected base. Adv. Powder Technol. 14, 401–410 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ooi, J.Y., Ai, J., Zhong, Z., Chen, J.F., Rotter, J.M.: Progressive pressure measurements beneath a granular pile with and without base deflection. In: Chen, J.F., Ooi, J.Y., Teng, J.G. (eds.) Structures and Granular Solids: From Scientific Principles to Engineering Applications, pp. 87–92. CRC Press, London (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    PFC2D: User’s Manual for PFC2D. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang, Z.X., Yang, J., Wang, L.Z.: Micro-scale modeling of anisotropy effects on undrained behavior of granular soil. Granul. Matter 15, 557–572 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dai, B.B., Yang, J., Luo, X.D.: A numerical analysis of the shear behavior of granular soil with fines. Particuology 21, 160–172 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dai, B.B., Yang, J., Zhou, C.Y., Luo, X.D.: DEM investigation on the effect of sample preparation on the shear behavior of granular soil. Particuology 25, 111–121 (2016).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cavarretta, I., Coop, M., O’Sullivan, C.: The influence of particle characteristics on the behaviour of coarse grained soils. Géotechnique 60, 413–423 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang, J., Wei, L.M.: Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Géotechnique 62, 1111–1125 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang, J., Luo, X.D.: Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 84, 196–213 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations