Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between two different mesh descriptions used for simulation of sieving processes

  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particle screening is an essential technology in many industrial fields. Related studies are often based on numerical simulations. This paper presents two different approaches for the mesh description used in the simulation of a particle screening process. The particular problem of interest is the separation of round shape particles of different sizes using a tumbling vertical cylinder while the particulate material is continuously fed into its interior. The first mesh model considers a probabilistic approach while the second model deals with the mesh in a very detailed way and considers the contact with individual wires that build up the mesh. The first model has the advantage that it is much simpler. In an attempt to better understand the mechanism of the particle transport between the different layers of the screening system, computational studies for different mesh probability factors have been performed. The results show that the two models have the same trend of results, but no complete agreement is achieved. Although the second model is much more sophisticated and computationally more expensive, the agreement between the two models can be improved by adjusting the probability factor in the first model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alkhaldi, H.: Contact investigations of granular mechanical media in a tumbling sorting machine. Dissertation. Schriften aus dem Institut für Technische und Numerische Mechanik 7, Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2007)

  2. Alkhaldi, H., Eberhard, P.: Particle screening phenomena in an oblique multi-level tumbling reservoir—a numerical study using discrete element simulation. Granul. Matter 9(6), 415–429 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alkhaldi, H., Eberhard, P.: Segregation of particulate material using the discrete element method. In: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Computational Methods in Contact Mechanics, Hannover, Germany, pp. 342–355 (2006)

  4. Coulson, J., Richardson, J.: In: Chemical Engineering. Particle Technology and Separation Processes, vol. 2. Pergamon, Oxford (1991)

  5. Cundall, P., Strack, O.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, 47–65 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhard, P., Alkhaldi, H.: Efficient computation of colliding particles in a vertical tumbling sorting machine. In: Proceedings Second International Congress on Computational Mechanics and Simulation (ICCMS), vol. 1. I.K. Publishing House, New Delhi, pp. 81–87 (2006)

  7. Ergenzinger, C.: Experimentelle Untersuchung der Dynamik des Siebvorgangs in einer Taumelsiebmaschine (in German). DIPL-116, Institute of Engineering and Computational Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Germany (2007)

  8. Fleißner, F., Gaugele, T., Eberhard, P.: Applications of the discrete element method in mechanical engineering. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18(1), 81–94 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, M., Glastonbury, J.: The size separation of particles by screening. Powder Technol. 1, 334–343 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaye, B., Robb, N.: An algorithm for deducing an effective sieve residue from the rate of powder passage through a sieve. Powder Technol 24, 125–128 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, J., Webb, C., Pandiella, S., Campbell, G.: Discrete particle motion on sieves—a numerical study using the DEM simulation. Powder Technol. 133, 190–202 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schiehlen, W., Eberhard, P.: Technische Dynamik (in German). Teubner, Stuttgart (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Standish, N.: The kinetics of batch sieving. Powder Technol. 41, 57–67 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Standish, N., Meta, I.: Some kinetic aspects of continuous screening. Powder Technol. 41, 165–171 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Eberhard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alkhaldi, H., Ergenzinger, C., Fleißner, F. et al. Comparison between two different mesh descriptions used for simulation of sieving processes. Granular Matter 10, 223–229 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-008-0084-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-008-0084-4

Keywords

Navigation