Abstract
Purpose
Obesity and a high body mass index (BMI) are considered as risk factors for abdominal wall hernia (AWH). However, anthropometric measures of body fat distribution (BFD) seem to be better indicators in the hernia field. This Mendelian randomization analysis aimed to generate more robust evidence for the impact of waist circumstance (WC), body, trunk, arm, and leg fat percentages (BFP, TFP, AFP, LFP) on AWH.
Methods
A univariable MR design was employed and the summary statistics allowing for assessment were obtained from the genome-wide association studies (GWASs). An inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was applied as the primary analysis, and the odds ratio value was used to evaluate the causal relationship between BFD and AWH.
Results
None of the MR-Egger regression intercepts deviated from null, indicating no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (p > 0.05). The Cochran Q test showed heterogeneity between the genetic IVs for WC (p = 0.005; p = 0.005), TFP (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), AFP-L (p = 0.016; p = 0.015), LFP-R (p = 0.012; p = 0.009), and LFP-L (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Taking the IVW random-effects model as gold standard, each standard deviation increment in genetically determined WC, BFP, TFP, AFP-R, AFP-L, LFP-R, and LFP-L raised the risk of AWH by 70.9%, 70.7%, 56.5%, 69.7%, 78.3%, 87.7%, and 72.5%, respectively.
Conclusions
This study proves the causal relationship between AWH and BFD, attracting more attention from BMI to BFD. It provides evidence-based medical evidence that healthy figure management can prevent AWH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
References
Mandal B, Kumar A, Agrawal S, Sah S, Gupta RK (2023) Short-term outcomes of eTEP repair of ventral hernia in university hospital of Nepal. Int J Abdomin Wall Hernia Surg 6:159–165. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.IJAWHS_10_23
Lee JS, Kim JM, Kim KS, Choi GS, Joh JW, Lee SK (2019) Predictors of incisional hernia in adult liver transplant recipients. Hernia 23:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1845-6
Ayuso S, Elhage SA, George MB, Anderson M, Levi DM, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2021) Management of incisional hernias in liver transplant patients: perioperative optimization and an open preperitoneal repair using porcine-derived biologic mesh. Int J Abdomin Wall Hernia Surg 4:95–102. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_14_21
Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Nguyen MT, Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Nguyen DH, Flores JR, Arita NT, Roth JS, Liang MK (2015) Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J Am Coll Surg 220:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027
Strigård K, Clay L, Stark B, Gunnarsson U, Falk P (2016) Giant ventral hernia-relationship between abdominal wall muscle strength and hernia area. BMC Surg 16:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0166-x
Holmes MV, Ala-Korpela M, Smith GD (2017) Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality. Nat Rev Cardiol 14:577–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.78
Zhou W, Liu G, Hung RJ, Haycock PC, Aldrich MC, Andrew AS, Arnold SM, Bickeböller H, Bojesen SE, Brennan P, Brunnström H, Melander O, Caporaso NE, Landi MT, Chen C, Goodman GE, Christiani DC, Cox A, Field JK, Johansson M, Kiemeney LA, Lam S, Lazarus P, Le Marchand L, Rennert G, Risch A, Schabath MB, Shete SS, Tardón A, Zienolddiny S, Shen H, Amos CI (2021) Causal relationships between body mass index, smoking and lung cancer: univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization. Int J Cancer 148:1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33292
Li Z, Xia L, Li X, Guan Y, He H, Jin L (2023) Body mass index and the risk of abdominal hernia: a Mendelian randomization study. Hernia 27:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02703-w
Robinson JR, Carroll RJ, Bastarache L, Chen Q, Mou Z, Wei WQ, Connolly JJ, Mentch F, Sleiman P, Crane PK, Hebbring SJ, Stanaway IB, Crosslin DR, Gordon AS, Rosenthal EA, Carrell D, Hayes MG, Wei W, Petukhova L, Namjou B, Zhang G, Safarova MS, Walton NA, Still C, Bottinger EP, Loos RJF, Murphy SN, Jackson GP, Kullo IJ, Hakonarson H, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, Weng C, Roden DM, Denny JC (2020) Association of genetic risk of obesity with postoperative complications using Mendelian randomization. World J Surg 44:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05202-9
Smith JR, Kyriakakis R, Pressler MP, Fritz GD, Davis AT, Banks-Venegoni AL, Durling LT (2023) BMI: does it predict the need for component separation? Hernia 27:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02596-9
Freuer D, Linseisen J, O’Mara TA, Leitzmann M, Baurecht H, Baumeister SE, Meisinger C (2021) Body Fat distribution and risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Cancers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205053
Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ (2015) LDlink: a web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics 31:3555–3557. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv402
Hu MJ, Tan JS, Gao XJ, Yang JG, Yang YJ (2022) Effect of cheese intake on cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular biomarkers. Nutrients 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142936
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 44:512–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv080
Burgess S, Bowden J, Fall T, Ingelsson E, Thompson SG (2017) Sensitivity analyses for robust causal inference from Mendelian randomization analyses with multiple genetic variants. Epidemiology 28:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000559
Villanueva-Martin G, Acosta-Herrera M, Kerick M, López-Isac E, Simeón CP, Callejas JL, Assassi S, Beretta L, I SSG, Asig A, Allanore Y, Proudman SM, Nikpour M, Fonseca C, Denton CP, Radstake T, Mayes MD, Jiang X, Martin J, Bossini-Castillo L (2022) The effect of body fat distribution on systemic sclerosis. J Clin Med 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206014
Walming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E (2017) Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg 17:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0
Mahfouz MEM, Al-Juaid RS (2021) Prevalence and risk factors of abdominal hernia among Saudi population. J Family Med Prim Care 10:3130–3136. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_622_21
Howard R, Thompson M, Fan Z, Englesbe M, Dimick JB, Telem DA (2019) Costs associated with modifiable risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia repair. JAMA Netw Open 2:e1916330. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16330
Goossens GH (2017) The metabolic phenotype in obesity: fat mass, body fat distribution, and adipose tissue function. Obes Facts 10:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1159/000471488
Rush EC, Goedecke JH, Jennings C, Micklesfield L, Dugas L, Lambert EV, Plank LD (2007) BMI, fat and muscle differences in urban women of five ethnicities from two countries. Int J Obes (Lond) 31:1232–1239. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803576
Yoo JG, Ki EY, Kim SM, Chung YH, Kang HJ, Jung G, Hwang IS, Jeung IC (2023) Visceral obesity as a risk factor of incisional hernia after single-port laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Asian J Surg 46:829–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.085
Aquina CT, Rickles AS, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Deeb AP, Monson JR, Fleming FJ (2015) Visceral obesity, not elevated BMI, is strongly associated with incisional hernia after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 58:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000261
Clark ST, Malietzis G, Grove TN, Jenkins JT, Windsor ACJ, Kontovounisios C, Warren OJ (2020) The emerging role of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing abdominal wall hernia repairs: a systematic review of the literature. Hernia 24:1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02179-6
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Municipality Health Bureau (ZKX18052).
Funding
Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Municipality Health Bureau (ZKX18052).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y Xv, Q Tao, and Z Ji contributed to conception and design; Y Xv, R Wu, N Cao, and Q Tao contributed to literature search, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; Y Xv, Q Tao, and Z Ji are responsible for drafting and revising the manuscript; all authors affirm final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval, Human and animal rights, and Informed consent
This study used publicly available GWAS summary data and there was no original data collected. Therefore, no ethical committee approval was required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xv, Y., Tao, Q., Cao, N. et al. The causal association between body fat distribution and risk of abdominal wall hernia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Hernia 28, 599–606 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02954-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02954-1