Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment to: “Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial.”

  • Comment
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Valverde S, Arbós MA, Quiles MT, Espín E, Sánchez-Garcia JL, Rodrigues V, Pereira JA, Villalobos R, García-Alamino JM, Armengol M, López-Cano M (2021) Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02435-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik REGJM, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ, PRIMA Trialist Group (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10222):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Köckerling F, Alam NN, Antoniou SA, Daniels IR, Famiglietti F, Fortelny RH, Heiss MM, Kallinowski F, Kyle-Leinhase I, Mayer F, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms F, Narang SK, Petter-Puchner A, Reinpold W, Scheuerlein H, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Strey C, Woeste G, Smart NJ (2018) What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction? Hernia 22(2):249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Ronchi A, Lucido FS, Brusciano L, Marvaso A, Dell’Isola C, Gambardella C (2021) Prophylactic sublay non-absorbable mesh positioning following midline laparotomy in a clean-contaminated field: randomized clinical trial (PROMETHEUS). Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    J. Li

Authors
  1. J. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to be declared by the authors.

Ethical approval

This article did not require ethical approval of any kind.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not include patients, and therefore informed consent was not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J. Comment to: “Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial.”. Hernia 26, 1405–1406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02452-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02452-2

Search

Navigation