Perioperative outcome in groin hernia repair: what are the most important influencing factors?

Abstract

Introduction

Using registry analyses, a large number of influencing factors on the perioperative outcome of groin hernia repair has been identified. The interactions between several influencing factors and differences in the influencing value have to date been inadequately investigated.

Methods

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Herniamed Registry included all fully documented cases with minimum age of 16 years and groin hernia repair. Patients were assigned to the risk groups unilateral, bilateral, recurrent and emergency groin hernia repair. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the influence of confirmatory defined patient- and procedure-related characteristics on the outcome parameters intraoperative, postoperative general and postoperative surgical complications, complication-related reoperation and total perioperative complications.

Results

A highly significantly unfavorable association with the total perioperative complication rate was identified for emergency groin hernia repair, scrotal hernia, anticoagulant medication and coagulopathy. A significantly unfavorable relation with the total perioperative complication rate was found for recurrence procedure, bilateral repair, high age, ASA score III/IV, femoral hernia, antithrombotic medication, smoking, COPD and corticosteroid medication. A significantly favorable correlation with the total perioperative complication rate was observed for the laparo-endoscopic techniques, smaller defects, female gender, normal weight and medial hernia.

Conclusion

Both the number of potential influencing factors and their influencing value on the perioperative outcome should be considered when estimating the individual risk of a patient with groin hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamäki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P (2007) Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 245:656–660. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000251364.32698.4b

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bhangu A, Singh P, Pinkney T, Blazeby JM (2015) A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis of inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1299-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-16668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Enander LK, Leijonmarck C, Österberg J (2006) Montgomery a short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93:1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5405

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Del Ferraro S, Manfredini L, Bonitta G, Bruni PG, Bona D (2021) Campanelli G Treatment of Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004735 (Online ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lundström KJ, Sandblom G, Smedberg S, Nordin P (2012) Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study. Ann Surg 255:784–788. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b7cb3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rühling V, Gunnarsson U, Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G (2015) Wound healing following open groin hernia surgery: the impact of comorbidity. World J Surg 39:2392–2399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3131-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nilsson H, Angerås U, Sandblom G, Nordin P (2016) Serious adverse events within 30 days of groin hernia surgery. Hernia 20:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1476-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2008) Anaesthesia and post-operative morbidity after elective groin hernia repair: a nation-wide study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 52(2):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01514.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weyhe D, Tabriz N, Sahlmann B, Uslar VN (2017) Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair-a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci 2:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Köckerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R, Friis-Andersen H, Gillion JF, Gorjanc J, Kopelman D, Lopez-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Österberg J, Reinpold W, Simmermacher RKJ (2019) The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 23:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Pass C, Köckerling. (2012) Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia 16:269–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0908.3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kyle-Leinhase I, Köckerling F, Jorgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, Hope Muysoms W, F (2018) Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia 22(561):575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1724-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Köckerling F, Lorenz R, Hukauf M, Grau H, Jacob D, Fortelny R (2019) Koch A Influencing Factors on the Outcome in Female Groin Hernia Repair: A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 15,601 Patients. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003271 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. (2000) PMID: 11234459

  16. 16.

    Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, Kongsnorth AN, Mandala V, Palot JP, Schumpelick V, Simmermacher RK, Stoppa R (2007) Flament JB The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Köckerling F, Brunner W, Mayer F, Fortelny R, Adolf D, Niebuhr H, Lorenz R, Reinpold W, Zarras K, Weyhe D (2020) Assessment of potential influencing factors on the outcome in small (<2 cm) umbilical hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 31,965 patients. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02305-4 (Online ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Drissi F, Gillion JF, Roquilly A, Luyckx F, Duchalais E (2020) Nationwide analysis of urinary retention following inguinal hernia repair: results from the national prospective hernia registry. World J Surg. 44:2638–2646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05538-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rosemar A, Angerås U, Rosengren A, Nordin P (2010) Effect of body mass index on groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 252:397–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e985a1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Willoughby AD, Lim RB, Lustik MB (2017) Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications. Surg Endosc 31:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Köckerling F, Hantel E, Adolf D, Stechemesser B, Niebuhr H, Lorenz R, Zarras K, Marusch F (2020) Do drains have an impact on the outcome after primary elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men? Hernia 24:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02254-y (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Köckerling.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Köckerling reports grants to fund Herniamed from Johnson & Johnson, Norderstedt, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, pfm medical, Cologne, Dahlhausen, Cologne, B Braun, Tuttlingen, MenkeMed, Munich, Bard, Karlsruhe. Personal fees from Bard, Karlsruhe, outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

As only cases of routine hernia surgery are documented in the Herniamed Registry, an ethical approval was not neccessary.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any study with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

All patients with routine hernia surgery documented in the Herniamed Registry have signed an informed consent declaration agreeing to participate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köckerling, F., Adolf, D., Lorenz, R. et al. Perioperative outcome in groin hernia repair: what are the most important influencing factors?. Hernia (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02417-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Groin hernia
  • Perioperative complications
  • Postoperative surgical complications
  • General complications
  • Complication-related reoperations