Skip to main content
Log in

Using local hemostatic to prevent seromas in patients with large incisional hernias randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of single-blind a randomized controlled trial on the use of the local hemostatic agent Haemoblock and ultrasound monitoring of postoperative wounds in patients after the large incisional hernias repair.

Methods

The study represented a single-blind randomized controlled trial. The total number of patients was 66. Group with Haemoblock (A) and the Group without Haemoblock (B) included 33 patients each. Operation—sublay retromuscular repair with mesh prolene implant. We applied Haemoblock 15 ml retromuscularly and 15 ml subcutaneousely in group A. Wounds were drained by vacuum suction drainage. Postoperatively – ultrasound monitoring of postoperative wounds.

Results

Median of follow-up was 33 days. Significant differences were obtained in the duration of wound draining, 2.6 ± 0.6 days in group A versus 4.1 ± 0.9 days in group B (p = 0.002). In group A, the levels of C-reactive protein and albumin were less in the separated discharge, as well as its total amount. During the first 12 days, a significantly lower volume of fluid collections was detected in patients of group A than in patients of group B. We noted a more rapid subsidence of exudative processes in postoperative wounds in patients from group A. The number of punctures was significantly higher in group B (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 0.2 ± 0.4, respectively, p = 0.003). The total number of puncture interventions in group A was six in six patients, versus 27 in 14 patients in group B (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

The use of the local hemostatic agent Haemoblock can reduce the duration of the postoperative wound draining, shorten the period of inflammatory exudative processes in the postoperative wound, significantly reduce the number of puncture interventions for the postoperative wound, reduce the risk of the seromas formation and surgical site infections (SSI) associated with seroma, reduce the severity of pain and the need for analgesics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janis JE, Khansa L, Khansa I (2016) Strategies for postoperative seroma prevention: a systematic review. PlastReconstrSurg 138(1):240–252. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Plymale MA, Harris JW, Davenport DL, Smith N, Levy S, Scott RJ (2016) Abdominal wall reconstruction: the uncertainty of the impact of drain duration upon outcomes. Am Surg 82(3):207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Massey LH, Pathak S, Bhargava A, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2018) The use of adjuncts to reduce seroma in open incisional hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia 22(2):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1690-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sforza M, Husein R, Andjelkov K, Rozental-Fernandes PC, Zaccheddu R, Jovanovic M (2015) Use of quilting sutures during abdominoplasty to prevent seroma formation: are they really effective? AesthetSurg J 35(5):574–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilone V, Vitiello A, Borriello C, Gargiulo S, Forestieri P (2015) The use of a fibrin glue with a low concentration of thrombin decreases seroma formation in postbariatric patients undergoing circular abdominoplasty. ObesSurg 25(2):354–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1467-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoikes N, Roan E, Webb D, Voeller GR (2018) The problem of seroma after ventral hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 32:93–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Swanson E (2016) Seroma prevention in abdominoplasty: eliminating the cause. AesthetSurg J 36(1):23–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Martino M, Nahas FX, Kimura AK, Sallum N, Ferreira LM (2015) Natural evolution of seroma in abdominoplasty. PlastReconstr Surg 135(4):691e–e698. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. He C, Lu J, Ong MW, Lee DJK, Tan KY, Chia CLK (2019) Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02098-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patti R, Caruso AM, Aiello P, Angelo GL, Buscemi S, Di Vita G (2014) Acute inflammatory response in the subcutaneous versus periprosthethic space after incisional hernia repair: an original article. BMCSurg 15(14):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salamone G, Licari L, Agrusa A, Romano G, Cocorullo G, Gulotta G (2015) Deep seroma after incisional hernia repair. Case reports and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir 12:86

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aho JM, Nickerson TP, Thiels CA, Saint-Cyr M, Farley DR (2016) Prevention of postoperative seromas with dead space obliteration: a case-control study. Int J Surg 29:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YJ, Kim HY, Han HH, Moon SH, Byeon JH, Rhie JW, Ahn ST, Oh DY (2017) Comparison of dissection with harmonic scalpel and conventional bipolar electrocautery in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap surgery: a consecutive cohort study. J PlastReconstr Aesthetic Surg 70(2):222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Skillman JM, Venus MR, Nightingale P, Titley OG, Park A (2014) Ligating perforators in abdominoplasty reduces the risk of seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(2):446–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0267-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasr MW, Jabbour SF, Mhawej RI, Elkhoury JS, Sleilati FH (2016) Effect of tissue adhesives on seroma incidence after abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AesthetSurgJ 36(4):450–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Safin DA, Romanov DV (2019) Using silver poly (acrylate) matrix (Haemoblock) in children with lymphatic malformations. J Pedia Surg Case Rep 46(101214):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsc.2019.101214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andreev AI, Ibragimov RA, Kuznetsov MV, Fatykhov AM, Anisimov AY (2015) Clinical experience of using hemostatic solution in surgical practice. Kazan Med J 96(3):451–455. https://doi.org/10.17750/KMJ2015-451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Degovtsov EN, Kolyadko PV, Kolyadko VP, Satinov AV (2018) The results of surgical treatment of patients with large and complex incisional hernias of the anterior abdominal wall in a multidisciplinary hospital. Byullyuten sibirskoi med 17(3):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

END—Original idea, preparation of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript; PVK—Original idea, data analysis, preparation of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, data collection and follow-up of patients; VPK—critical revision of the manuscript, data collection and follow-up of patients, clinical study leader; AVS—critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Kolyadko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest involved.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Omsk state Medical University (protocol № 99 oт 14.12.2017) and the study was conducted according to the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study after detail explanation of possible complications. Patients were then given at least 24 h for consideration of participating in the clinical trial before the operation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Degovtsov, E.N., Kolyadko, P.V. & Kolyadko, V.P. Using local hemostatic to prevent seromas in patients with large incisional hernias randomized controlled trial. Hernia 25, 441–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02251-1

Keywords

Navigation