Comment on: Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Gavriilidis P, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, de Angelis N, Die Saverio S (2019) Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02049-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR (2012) A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 5:846–853. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824e96cf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Koning GG, Wetterslev J, van Laarhoven CJHM, Kreus F (2013) The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein’s technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials. PLoS ONE 8(1):e52599

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, Tao W, Jianguo L, Xianli H (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res 192:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gutlic N, Gutlic A, Petersson U, Rogmark P, Montgomery A (2019) Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial). BJS 106:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11230

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen C, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair—a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819255d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Jorgensen LN, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Simons MP (2014) Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 18:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1236-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Simons MP, Smietanski M, Bonjer HJ, Bittner R, Miserez M, Aufenacker TJ et al (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Poelman MM, van den Heuvel B, Deelder JD, Abis GSA, Beudeker N, Bittner R, Campanelli G, van Dam D, Dwars BJ, Eker HH, Fingerhut A, Khatkov I, Kockerling F, Kukleta JF, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Munoz-Brands RM, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms FE, Soltes M, Tromp W, Yavuz Y, Bonjer HJ (2013) EAES consensus development conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 27:3505–3519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3001-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair. N Engl J Med 351:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Da Costa BR, Jüni P (2014) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls. Eur Heart J 35:3336–3345. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Morlacchi A et al (2019) Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Köckerling.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Köckerling reports personal fees from BARD, outside the submitted work. Dr. Adolf has nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

This article does not require ethical approval.

Human and animal rights

This study does not contain any studies with human participants.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not necessary.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köckerling, F., Adolf, D. Comment on: Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Hernia 24, 907–908 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02110-8

Download citation