References
Pokala B, Armijo PR, Flores L, Hennings D, Oleynikov D (2019) Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review. Hernia 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01934-8
Huerta S (2019) Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is not superior to open. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02045-0
Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113
Hall BR, Armijo PR, Grams B, Lomelin D, Oleynikov D (2019) Identifying patients at risk for urinary retention following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution study. Hernia 23(2):311–315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Oleynikov is the stockholder of Virtual Incision Corporation. Dr. Pokala, Dr. Armijo, Ms. Flores, and Dr. Hennings have nothing to disclose.
Ethical approval
This research was not classified as human subjects research, ethical approval was not required.
Human and animal rights
This study was not classified as human subjects research, IRB approval was not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not necessary for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This reply refers to the comment available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02045-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pokala, B., Armijo, P.R., Flores, L. et al. Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is not superior to open: Author’s reply. Hernia 24, 219–220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02044-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02044-1