Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children.

Methods

This study was conducted at Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2016 and June 2018. Five hundred and eighteen patients under the age of 12 years with inguinal hernias were subjected to single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC) using non-absorbable suture by “two-hooked” core needle apparatus. Description of the technique is as follows: Under general anesthesia, a 0.5–0.8 cm trans-umbilical skin incision was done for insertion of a 0.5 cm port. A “two-hooked” core needle apparatus was used for insertion of a non-absorbable suture around internal ring. The suture knot was tied extracorporeally.

Results

Among 518 child patients with inguinal hernias, there were 406 males and 112 females with a mean age of 4.6 ± 3.5 years. One hundred and six cases were subjected to bilateral surgery including 91 cases of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Three cases converted to open surgery and additional 0.5 cm port was done in five cases. The mean operative time was 13.2 ± 3.5 min for unilateral hernia repair and 16.9 ± 4.6 min for bilateral cases. All patients achieved full recovery without complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic ascent of the testis. At the mean follow-up time of 18.72 ± 5.27 months, two cases had recurrences (0.39%) and one case had postoperative hydrocele (0.19%).

Conclusion

SPLPEC of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children is a feasible and reliable minimal invasive procedure. It has the advantages of short operating time, low complication rate, low recurrence rate and better cosmetic result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Gohary MA (1997) Laparoscopic ligation of inguinal hernia in girls. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 1:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke S (2010) Pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele: An evidence-based review in the era of minimal access surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(3):305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PK (2005) Prospective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 19:927–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takehara H, Yakabe S, Kameoka K (2006) Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children: clinical outcome of 972 repairs done in 3 pediatric surgical institutions. J Pediatr Surg 41:1999–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison MR, Lee H, Albanese CT et al (2005) Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg 40:1177–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozgediz D, Roayaie K, Lee H et al (2007) Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: report of a new technique and early results. Surg Endosc 21:1327–1331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patkowski D, Czernik J, Chrzan R et al (2006) Percutaneous internal ring suturing: a simple minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernia repair in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:513–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bharathi RS, Arora M, Baskaran V (2008) How we “SEAL” internal ring in pediatric inguinal hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang YT (2010) Technical refinements in single-port laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernia in infants and children. Diagn Ther Endosc 392847:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/392847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li B, Nie X, Xie H, Gong D (2012) Modified single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for pediatric inguinal hernias: based on 1,107 cases in China. Surg Endosc 26:3663–3668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McClain L, Streck C, Lesher A, Cina R, Hebra A (2015) Laparoscopic needle-assisted inguinal hernia repair in 495 children. Surg Endosc 29:781–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li S, Liu X, Wong KKY, Liu L, Li Y (2018) Single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using a two-hooked cannula device with hydrodissection. J Pediatr Surg 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.08.009. pii: S0022-3468(18)30515-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shalaby R, Ismail M, Shehata S et al (2015) Shalaby technique for efficient single incision laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 50(11):1995–2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ismail M, Shalaby R (2014) Single instrument intracorporeal knot tying during single port laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a new simplified technique. J Pediatr Surg 49(6):1044–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies DA, Rideout DA, Clarke SA (2017) The international pediatric endosurgery group evidence-based guideline on minimal access approaches to the operative management of inguinal hernia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 31. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0453

  16. Zhang Y, Chao M, Zhang X, Wang Z, Fan D, Zhang K, Cai Y, Liang C (2018) Does the laparoscopic treatment of paediatric hydroceles represent a better alternative to the traditional open repair technique? A retrospective study of 1332 surgeries performed at two centers in China. Hernia 22(4):661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1715-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Esposito C, St Peter SD, Escolino M, Juang D, Settimi A, Holcomb GW (2014) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: A systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Celebi S, Uysal AI, Inal FY, Yildiz A (2014) A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open bilateral hernia repair in boys. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kokorowski PJ, Wang HH, Routh JC, Hubert KC, Nelson CP (2014) Evaluation of the contralateral inguinal ring in clinically unilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 18:311–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (2010) IPEG Guidelines for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(2):x–xiv. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.9998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu W, Wu R, Du G (2014) Single-port laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair of paediatric inguinal hernias and hydroceles by using modified Kirschner pin: a novel technique. Hernia 18(3):345–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S et al (2015) A modified approach for inguinal hernias in children: hybrid single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal ligation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 25(8):689–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yilmaz E, Afsarlar CE, Senel E, Cavusoglu YH, Karaman I, Karaman A, Ozguner IF (2015) A novel technique for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure assisted by an optical forceps. Pediatr Surg Int 31(7):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Programme Code: QML20170307.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HY and QC contributed almost the same and mainly do the writing of this paper, language editing and reviewing of related literature together. So these two authors are co-first authors. YJ and GZ collected the data and did the statistical analysis. W Ping and GG are the superior directors who were referred to when managing clinical cases. HY, ZF and WH did most of the operations and did the follow-up.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Jing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

YH, CQ, PW, FZ, GW, ZG, GG, and JY declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board approval and the study including human participants had been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consents were obtained from all patients’ parents or guardians.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yonggang, H., Changfu, Q., Ping, W. et al. Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children. Hernia 23, 1267–1273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01933-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01933-9

Keywords

Navigation