Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric inguinal hernias, are they all the same? A proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To propose a new clinical classification for pediatric inguinal hernias modified from a similar classification system for adult inguinal hernia and to propose a tailored repair for each type. The impact of this approach on hernia recurrence will be assessed.

Methods

This prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary teaching university hospitals in Egypt (Alexandria and Tanta University Children’s Hospitals) from January 2013 to December 2014 on children below 12 years of age with indirect inguinal hernias who were divided into two groups: (a) prospective group I, classified according to our proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment (PHCTT) into types: pediatric Nyhus 1 (PNI) assigned for herniotomy alone, pediatric Nyhus II (PNII) assigned for herniotomy plus deep ring narrowing, and type pediatric Nyhus III (PNIII) assigned for herniotomy plus posterior wall repair. (b) Retrospective unclassified group II where all cases were assigned to herniotomy alone (open). Data about patient characteristics, assigned hernia type, operative findings, procedures done, and postoperative complications were documented and analyzed by comparing the outcomes of the two groups.

Results

A total of 371 patients were included in this study with 401 hernias (30 bilateral); group I included of 217 patients, while group II included 154 patients. There was a male preponderance in group I (173/217 = 80%) and in group II (130/154 = 85%); the majority in both groups were less than 12 months of age, in group I (132/217 = 66%) and in group II (120/154 = 85%). The median age was 4 months and the median duration of symptoms was 2 months. For group I, PNII hernias formed the predominant cluster making 40% (94/235) followed by PNI hernias making 34.8% (82/235), while PNIII hernias were the least group being 25% (59/235) only. The mean follow-up period was 9.2 months ± 4.8 SD (and 9.1 months ± 2 SD in group II). The pooled recurrence rate was 1.9% (8/401) of the whole series, a weighted mean of the individual recurrence rates of 0% (0/235) of group I and 4.8% (8/166) of group II patients, all males. This difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Pediatric inguinal hernias are not the same and there is extreme variation in the presentation regarding the size of the defect. We proposed a nouvelle pediatric hernia classification modified from the original Nyhus classification for adult inguinal hernia with tailored surgical approach to each type (PHCTT). Applying this (PHCTT), it has the benefit of a significant reduction of recurrence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lau ST, Lee YH, Caty MG (2007) Current management of hernias and hydroceles. Semin Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2006.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang KS (2012) Assessment and management of inguinal hernia in infants abstract. Off J Am Acad Pediatr 130:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lugo-Vicente H (2003) PSU, 2003. In: Pediatric Surgery Update, vol 21. http://home.coqui.net/titolugo/PSU21.html#2161. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  4. Agrawal CS, Pratap A (2007) Pediatric inguinal hernia: controversies and decision making. Nepal Med Coll J 9:199–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suvera M, Damor P, Patel S (2013) Surgery for inguinal hernia in pediatric age. Int J Res Med Sci 1:112. https://doi.org/10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20130515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt MLDM (2008) Pediatric hernias. Surg Clin N Am 88:27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2007.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah JNSN (2010) Paediatric day care inguinal hernia surgery in a general hospital: a prospective study on change in practice. J Nepal Paediatr Soc 30:128–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert AI, Graham MF, Voigt WJ (2018) Inguinal hernia: anatomy and management. In: Medscape C. https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/420354_5. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  9. Borenstein SH, To T, Wajja A, Langer JC (2005) Effect of subspecialty training and volume on outcome after pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorairajan N (2004) Inguinal hernia-yesterday, today and tomorrow. Indian J Surg 66:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kassab P, Franciulli EF, Wroclawski CKIECO (2013) Meshless treatment of open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study. Einstein 11:186–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Renzulli P, Frei E, Schafer MS, Wegmuller H L (1997) Preoperative Nyhus classification of inguinal hernias and type-related individual hernia repair. A case for diagnostic laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc 7:373–377 (Abstract Citations BioEntities Related Articles External Links Renzulli P, Frei E, Schäfer M, Werlen S, Wegmüller H)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor K, Sonderman KA, Wolf LL et al (2018) Hernia recurrence following inguinal hernia repair in children. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zollinger R Jr (2003) Classification systems for groin hernias. Surg Clin N Am 83:1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00126-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nyhus LM, Lloyd M, Condon RE, Robert E (1995) Hernia. J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDonnell D, Wakefield C (2018) Adult groin hernias: acute and elective. Surg Oxford Int Ed 36:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hebra A (2017) Pediatric hernias. In: Medscape. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/932680-overview. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  18. Toki A, Watanabe Y, Sasaki K et al (2003) Ultrasonographic diagnosis for potential contralateral inguinal hernia in children. J Pediatr Surg 38:224–226. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2003.50048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shehata SM, El Attar A, Attia M et al (2013) Laparoscopic herniotomy in children: prospective assessment of tertiary center experience in a developing country. Hernia 17:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1031-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abouheba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SS declares no conflict of interest. SS declares no conflict of interest. HW declares no conflict of interest. MA declares no conflict of interest. AE declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval and human rights forms were approved by IRB of Alexandria University.

Human and animal rights

The study conducted on human participants has been performed according to the ethical standards of the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The study was approved by the IRB of Alexandria University, a detailed informed consent was obtained from each of the patients' guardians.

Informed consent

A detailed informed consent was obtained from each patient’s guardian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shehata, S., Shehata, S., Wella, H.L. et al. Pediatric inguinal hernias, are they all the same? A proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment. Hernia 22, 941–946 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1816-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1816-y

Keywords

Navigation