, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 303–309 | Cite as

Outcomes of utilizing absorbable mesh as an adjunct to posterior sheath closure during complex posterior component separation

  • J. S. Winder
  • A. Majumder
  • M. Fayezizadeh
  • Y. W. Novitsky
  • E. M. Pauli



A minority of patients undergoing posterior component separation (PCS) have abdominal wall defects that preclude complete reconstruction of the visceral sac with native tissue. The use of absorbable mesh bridges (AMB) to span such defects has not been established. We hypothesized that AMB use during posterior sheath closure of PCS is safe and provides favorable outcomes.


We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing PCS with AMB at two hernia centers. Main outcome measures included demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative complications.


36 patients were identified. Post-operative wound complications included five surgical site infections. At a median of 27 months, there were five recurrent hernias (13.9%), 2 of which were parastomal, but no episodes of intestinal obstruction/fistula.


Utilization of AMB for large posterior layer deficits results in acceptable rates of perioperative wound morbidity, effective PCS repairs, and does not increase intestinal morbidity or fistula formation.


Transversus abdominis release Abdominal wall reconstruction Hernia Component separation Mesh 



We would like to thank John D. Potochny, M.D. for the artwork he provided for this article.


This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

JSW, AM, and MF have no conflicts of interest to disclose. YWN is a paid consultant for C. R. Bard, Inc and Cooper Surgical, Inc and has received research support from C. R. Bard, Inc. EMP is a paid consultant for W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Cook Group Inc, and has received research support from Cook Group Inc and Miromatrix Medical Inc.

Ethical approval

After receiving institutional review board approval at each of the two institutions, we performed a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair at two hernia centers (Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH). We included all patients who underwent PCS from 2011 to 2015 who required an AMB for posterior layer reconstruction.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to all surgical procedures.


  1. 1.
    Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13(5):545–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H, Henry X, Duclaye C, Monchaux G, Hillebrant JP (1973) Original procedure of groin hernia repair: interposition without fixation of Dacron tulle prosthesis by subperitoneal median approach. Chirurgie; memoires de l’Academie de chirurgie 99(2):119–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carbonell AM (2008) Interparietal hernias after open retromuscular hernia repair. Hernia: J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 12(6):663–666. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones CM, Winder JS, Potochny JD, Pauli EM (2016) Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: technique, utility, and outcomes in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):636–646. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) Posterior and open anterior components separations: a comparative analysis. Am J Surg 203(3):318–322; discussion 322.
  7. 7.
    Pauli EM, Rosen MJ (2013) Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. Surg Clin North Am 93(5):1111–1133. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raigani S, Criss CN, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2014) Single-center experience with parastomal hernia repair using retromuscular mesh placement. J Gastrointestinal Surg 18(9):1673–1677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YM, Rosen MJ (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Posielski NM, Yee ST, Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW (2015) Repair of massive ventral hernias with “quilted” mesh. Hernia: J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 19(3):465–472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20(5):271–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Pesa NL, Will P, Harth KC, Novitsky YW, Rowbottom JR, Rosen MJ (2012) Predicting severe postoperative respiratory complications following abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):836–841. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winder JS, Behar BJ, Juza RM, Potochny J, Pauli EM (2016) Transversus abdominus release for abdominal wall reconstruction: early experience with a novel technique. J Am Coll Surg. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu L, Petro C, Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Anderson J, Novitsky YW (2016) The use of Vicryl mesh in a porcine model to assess its safety as an adjunct to posterior fascial closure during retromuscular mesh placement. Hernia: J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 20(2):289–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vertrees A, Greer L, Pickett C, Nelson J, Wakefield M, Stojadinovic A, Shriver C (2008) Modern management of complex open abdominal wounds of war: a 5-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 207(6):801–809. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Godat L, Kobayashi L, Costantini T, Coimbra R (2013) Abdominal damage control surgery and reconstruction: world society of emergency surgery position paper. World J Emerg Surg: WJES 8(1):53. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diaz JJ Jr, Dutton WD, Ott MM, Cullinane DC, Alouidor R, Armen SB, Bilanuik JW, Collier BR, Gunter OL, Jawa R, Jerome R, Kerwin AJ, Kirby JP, Lambert AL, Riordan WP, Wohltmann CD (2011) Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma: a review of the management of the open abdomen–part 2 “Management of the open abdomen”. J Trauma 71(2):502–512. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Zarzaur BL, Maish GO, 3rd, Minard G, Schroeppel TJ, Fabian TC (2008) Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma 65(2):337–342; discussion 342–334.
  20. 20.
    Wang TY, Elliott R, Low DW (2013) Damage control abdomen: single-stage reconstruction using a vicryl mesh buttress. Ann Plast Surg 70(3):324–330. PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Winder
    • 1
  • A. Majumder
    • 2
  • M. Fayezizadeh
    • 2
  • Y. W. Novitsky
    • 2
  • E. M. Pauli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterHersheyUSA
  2. 2.Cleveland Comprehensive Hernia Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations