Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two-port totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a 10-year experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic two-port totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A 10-year retrospective analysis from 2004 to 2013 of patients undergoing two-port TEP performed by a single surgeon at three surgical centers.

Results

336 consecutive patients underwent two-port TEP repairing 478 hernias. 315 (93.8 %) patients were male and 21 (6.2 %) were female. Mean age ± SD was 47 ± 14 years and mean body mass index ± SD was 28.0 ± 4.7 kg/m2. Indications for surgery included primary repair 303 (90.2 %), recurrence from open repair 28 (8.3 %), and incarcerated inguinal hernia 5 (1.5 %). 194 (57.7 %) cases were unilateral and 142 (42.3 %) were bilateral. Operative time ± SD was 38.7 ± 14.9 min for unilateral repair and 43.4 ± 17.6 min for bilateral repair. Two-port TEP was successful in 316 (94.0 %). 20 (6.0 %) cases required the addition of a third port. 2 (0.6 %) cases were converted to open repair. Mean follow-up time ± SD was 5.4 ± 2.7 years. Postoperative complications included urinary retention 5 (1.5 %), seroma 7 (2.1 %), hematoma 1 (0.3 %), surgical site infection 4 (1.2 %), and chronic inguinal pain 3 (0.9 %). 11 (2.3 %) hernias recurred.

Conclusion

Two-port TEP appears to be a feasible, safe, and effective method for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and should be considered a viable, less invasive alternative to conventional three-port techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu S, Chandran S, Somers SS, Toh SK (2005) Cost-effective laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair: the Portsmouth technique. Hernia J Hernias Abdom wall Surg 9(4):363–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Beslin MB (2008) First case of single incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Acta clinica Croatica 47(4):249–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai YC, Da Lin C, Chueh SC (2014) Technical refinement of mini-laparoscopic hernia repair in infants and children. Hernia Journal Hernias Abdoml Wall Surg

  4. Chung SD, Huang CY, Wang SM, Hung SF, Tsai YC, Chueh SC, Yu HJ (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site totally extraperitoneal adult inguinal hernia repair: initial 100 patients. Surg Endosc 25(11):3579–3583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Sremac M, Ledinsky M, Beslin MB (2012) Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience. J Endourol Endourol Soc 26(1):63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He K, Chen H, Ding R, Hua R, Yao Q (2011) Single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 15(4):451–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakasugi M, Masuzawa T, Tei M, Omori T, Ueshima S, Tori M, Akamatsu H (2014) Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today

  8. Lopez-Cano M, Pereira JA, Mojal S, Lozoya R, Quiles MT, Arbos MA, Armengol-Carrasco M (2012) An ergonomic study of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair. European Surgical research Europaische Chirurgische Forschung Recherches Chirurgicales Europeennes 49(3–4):107–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Agaba EA, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(2):204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang GP, Tung KL (2014) A comparative study of single incision versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg

  11. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. New Engl J Med 350(18):1819–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, Tao W, Jianguo L, Xianli H (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res 192(2):409–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McKernan JB, Laws HL (1993) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc 7(1):26–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu X, Cao H, Ma Y, Yuan A, Wu X, Miao Y, Guo S (2014) Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinburgh Ireland 12(2):94–105

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurmann A, Fischer H, Dell-Kuster S, Rosenthal R, Audige L, Schupfer G, Metzger J, Honigmann P (2015) Effect of intraoperative infiltration with local anesthesia on the development of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Surgery 157(1):144–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sajid MS, Leaver C, Baig MK, Sains P (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 99(1):29–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V, Ghusn M, Crampton N, White S (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(3):757–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    M. A. Fuglestad & S. J. Waisbren

  2. VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    S. J. Waisbren

  3. 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    M. A. Fuglestad

Authors
  1. M. A. Fuglestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. J. Waisbren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Fuglestad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuglestad, M.A., Waisbren, S.J. Two-port totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a 10-year experience. Hernia 20, 423–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1402-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1402-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation