Skip to main content

Optimal timeline for emergency surgery in patients with strangulated groin hernias

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective study evaluates the clinical course and outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for strangulated hernias.

Methods

Among 520 groin hernias from 2001 to 2012, 51 inguinal and 42 femoral hernias were strangulated and operated emergently at a tertiary referral center. Perioperative factors, patient profiles, and time interval to surgery (T total = time from onset to surgery, T 1 = time from onset to initial evaluation, T 2 = time from the first hospital to the tertiary center, T 3 = time from admission at the tertiary center to surgery, T total = T 1 + T 2 + T 3) were analyzed in patients with strangulation, then compared between two groups, the bowel resection (BR) group and the non-bowel resection (NBR) group.

Results

T 1, T 2 and T total in the bowel resection group were significantly longer than those in the non-bowel resection group (P < 0.05). Patients who presented initially to the tertiary center (T 2 = 0) had a significantly lower resection rate than patients transported from other hospitals (24 vs. 44 %, P = 0.048). There was no significant difference in morbidity between the BR and NBR groups (35 vs. 24 %, P = 0.231).

Conclusions

The elapsed time from onset to surgery, especially T 1 and T 2, is the most important prognostic factor in patients with strangulated groin hernias. Early diagnosis and transportation are essential for good outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 25:835–839

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith MA, Soper NJ (1999) Small intestine. In: Doherty GM, Meko JB, Olsen JA, Peplinski GR (eds) The Washington manual of surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 216–227

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews NJ (1981) Presentation and outcome of strangulated external hernia in a district general hospital. Br J Surg 68:329–332

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulah B, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Kulacoglu IH, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Emergency hernia repairs in elderly patients. Am J Surg 182:455–459

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, Solis JA, Alvarez P, Jorge JI (2004) Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome. Hernia 8:121–126

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka N, Uchiida N, Ogihara H, Sasamoto H, Kato H, Kuwano H (2010) Clinical study of inguinal and femoral incarcerated hernias. Surg Today 40:1144–1147

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rai S, Chandra SS, Smile SR (1998) A study of the risk of strangulation and obstruction in groin hernias. Aust N Z J Surg 68:650–654

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Koizumi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koizumi, M., Sata, N., Kaneda, Y. et al. Optimal timeline for emergency surgery in patients with strangulated groin hernias. Hernia 18, 845–848 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1219-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1219-7

Keywords

  • Inguinal hernia
  • Femoral hernia
  • Strangulated hernia
  • Emergency operation
  • Postoperative complications
  • Timeline