Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of open intraperitoneal incisional hernia repair based on patient-reported outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The outcomes of open incisional hernia repair from the patients’ point of view have variations over time, and only continuous follow-up would reflect the real outcomes. The purpose of this study is to validate a standard measurement instrument in the form of a questionnaire to report the evolutionary outcomes of a specific open technique to repair incisional hernias.

Methods

Prospective study follows up a cohort of 82 consecutive patients submitted to elective intraperitoneal open hernioplasty of midline incisional hernias. The follow-up consisted in an interview and physical examination 30 days after surgery, at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years. Primary outcome measure was reporting the outcomes of hernia repair according to a standardized scale obtained from a questionnaire.

Results

There was no correlation between complications suffered by patients and score results (p = 0.722). The length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 4.3 days, and a prolonged hospital stay was related to complications (p = 0.002) and did not influence the score results (p = 0.365). The final score demonstrated that patients had a very good impression on this procedure 1 month after surgery (p = 0.003). This impression shifted to an excellent perception 1 year after surgery remaining similar until the last control (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In this series, the intraperitoneal hernioplasty was a procedure associated with minor morbidity and without recurrences 4 years after the operation. The outcomes from the patients’ point of view were excellent 1 year after the procedure with a tendency to improve in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN (2012) From ancient to contemporary times: a concise history of incisional hernia repair. Hernia 16:1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicolo E (2007) “Fatto il polipropipleno”: a tribute to Giulio Natta. Hernia 11:385–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Junge K et al (2004) Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klinge U, Conze J, Krones CJ et al (2005) Incisional hernia: open techniques. World J Surg 29:1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Gorfine SR et al (2002) Rives-Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias: experience with 57 patients. Hernia 6:120–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Notash AY, Notash AY Jr, Farshi JS et al (2007) Outcomes of the Rives-Stoppa technique in incisional hernia repair: ten years of experience. Hernia 11:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iqbal CW, Pham TH, Joseph A et al (2007) Long-term outcome of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives-Stoppa technique. World J Surg 31:2398–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehrabi M, Jangjoo A, Tavoosi H et al (2010) Long-term outcome of Rives-Stoppa technique in complex ventral incisional hernia repair. World J Surg 32:1696–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S et al (2008) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 32:31–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006438

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kingsnorth AN, Sivarajasingham N, Wong S et al (2004) Open mesh repair of incisional hernias with significant loss of domain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:363–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vidović D, Jurišić D, Franjić BD et al (2006) Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 10:322–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerland S, Korenkov M, Kleinen T et al (2004) Obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 8:42–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johanet H, Dabrowski A, Hauters P (2006) Laparoscopic cure of small ventral hernias with composite mesh. Hernia 10:414–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberg J, Burcharth J (2008) Feasibility and outcome after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using Proceed mesh. Hernia 12:453–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno-Egea A, Castillo JA, Girela E (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh. Surg Endosc 24:359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L et al (2007) Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 11:315–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams RF, Martin DF, Mulrooney MT et al (2008) Intraperitoneal modification of the Rives-Stoppa repair for large incisional hernias. Hernia 12:141–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ammaturo C, Bassi UA, Bassi G (2010) Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases. Updates Surg 62:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moreno-Egea A, Aguayo-Albasini JL, Ballester MM et al (2009) Treatment of incisional hernias adopting an intra-abdominal approach with a new low-density composite prosthetic material: proceed: our preliminary experience on 50 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:497–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beltrán MA, Burgos C, Almonacid J et al (2005) Long-term follow-up of tension-free Lichtenstein hernioplasty: application of a qualitative-and-quantitative measurement instrument. Hernia 9:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS (2006) Outcomes of Lichtenstein hernioplasty for primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. World J Surg 30:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fränneby U, Gunnarsson U, Wollert S et al (2005) Discordance between the patient’s and surgeon’s perception of complications following hernia surgery. Hernia 9:145–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS (2006) The outcomes of open tension-free hernioplasty in elderly patients. Hernia 10:395–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS (2007) Are the outcomes of emergency Lichtenstein hernioplasty similar to the outcomes of elective Lichtenstein hernioplasty? Int J Surg 5:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mussack T, Ladurner R, Vogel T et al (2006) Health-related quality-of-life changes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:410–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bitzer EM, Lorenz C, Nickel S et al (2008) Patient-reported outcomes in hernia repair. Hernia 12:407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jørgensen LN et al (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Poelman MM, Schellekens JF, Langenhorst BL et al (2010) Health-related quality of life in patients treated for incisional hernia with an onlay technique. Hernia 14:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Vick CC et al (2011) Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and quality of life after elective incisional hernia repair: effects of recurrence and repair technique. Hernia 15:123–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaafarani HM, Hur K, Campasano M, Reda DJ, Itani KM (2010) Classification and valuation of postoperative complications in a randomized trial of open versus laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia 14:231–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17:1778–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Beltrán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beltrán, M.A., Rioseco, MP., Molina, M. et al. Outcomes of open intraperitoneal incisional hernia repair based on patient-reported outcomes. Hernia 18, 47–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1041-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1041-z

Keywords

Navigation