Skip to main content

Multicentric observational study of pain after the use of a self-gripping lightweight mesh

Abstract

Introduction

Investigation in the field of inguinal hernia surgery is now focused on postoperative pain. The extended use of lightweight meshes and alternative methods of fixation may play a relevant role in the reduction of pain. In this study, a new self-gripping lightweight polypropylene mesh is tested.

Methods

A multicentric, observational study was scheduled to prospectively evaluate this new mesh. Ten centers agreed to participate. Only primary, type 1 or 2 uncomplicated hernias in adults were included. The mesh was placed as a Lichtenstein procedure without any fixation. A complete pain questionnaire was followed at 1 week, and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The principal goal of the study was to evaluate maximum pain score at 6 months. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale. A total of 256 patients were operated. Mean operative time was 35.6 min; 76.2% of patients were operated in an ambulatory setting.

Results

There were a few postoperative complications: 2 wound infections, 17 seromas, 21 hematomas, 6 orchitis. The incidence of acute pain was 27.3% at week 1 and 7.5% at month 1. The incidence of chronic pain was 3.6% at month 3 and 2.8% at month 6. No recurrences or long-term complications were observed.

Conclusion

This self-gripping mesh can be used safely in type 1 and 2 primary, uncomplicated inguinal hernia with minimal morbidity and most patients under ambulatory setting. The registered incidence of chronic pain is lower than 3%.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Koninger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:361–365

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:1122–1126

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paajanen H (2007) A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia. Hernia 11:335–339

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13:137–142

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy (1986). Pain Suppl 3:S1–S226

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C, Strobbe LJ, Wolff A, Bleichrodt RP (2008) An overview of the features influencing pain after inguinal hernia repair. Int J Surg 6:351–356

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H (2010) Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology 112:957–969

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, AP AP, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63:129–136

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93:1056–1059

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan N, Bangash A, Sadiq M, Ul Hadi A, Hamid H (2010) Polyglactine/polypropylene mesh vs propylene mesh: is there a need for newer prosthesis in inguinal hernia? Saudi J Gastroenterol 16:8–13

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P, Smeds S, Kald A (2008) Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Br J Surg 95:1226–1231

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Sahu T, Mahajan KC (2010) Traditional polypropylene and lightweight meshes in totally extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy. Int J Surg 8:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shah BC, Goede MR, Bayer R, Buettner SL, Putney SJ, McBride CL, Oleynikov D (2009) Does type of mesh used have an impact on outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia? Am J Surg 198:759–764

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akolekar D, Kumar S, Khan LR, de Beaux AC, Nixon SJ (2008) Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia 12:39–43

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Franneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P, Nyren O, Gunnarsson U (2006) Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg 244:212–219

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pascual G, Rodriguez M, Gomez-Gil V, Garcia-Honduvilla N, Bujan J, Bellon JM (2008) Early tissue incorporation and collagen deposition in lightweight polypropylene meshes: bioassay in an experimental model of ventral hernia. Surgery 144:427–435

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Costello CR, Bachman SL, Grant SA, Cleveland DS, Loy TS, Ramshaw BJ (2007) Characterization of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene prosthetic mesh explants from a single patient. Surg Innov 14:168–176

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2002) Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res 103:208–214

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hidalgo M, Castillo MJ, Eymar JL, Hidalgo A (2005) Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty: sutures versus glue. Hernia 9:242–244

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7:13–16

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Á. García Ureña.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 1601 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García Ureña, M.Á., Hidalgo, M., Feliu, X. et al. Multicentric observational study of pain after the use of a self-gripping lightweight mesh. Hernia 15, 511–515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0811-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0811-3

Keywords

  • Inguinal hernia
  • Chronic pain
  • Mesh
  • Polypropylene
  • Hernioplasty