Skip to main content

Different techniques for mesh application give the same abdominal muscle strength

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigates abdominal muscle strength after surgery for giant hernia with the onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal (IPOM) method. Theoretically, placement of the mesh may result in different possibilities regarding function and postoperative physical activity related to abdominal muscle function.

Method

Twenty-four patients operated for large ventral hernias using the onlay, sublay or IPOM technique were evaluated 1 year following surgery for abdominal wall strength using Biodex system 4.

Results

Despite the different surgical techniques used, no differences were observed in abdominal wall strength between the groups.

Conclusion

The postoperative strength of abdominal wall muscles is independent of the method used for reconstruction of large abdominal wall hernia, and the choice of surgical technique should be directed by anatomical circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Stoopa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13:545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of inscisional hernias. Arch Surg 133:378–382

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Öttinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieuwenhuizen J, Kleinrensink GJ, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2008) Indications for incisional hernia repair: an international questionnaire among hernia surgeons. Hernia 12:223–225

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klinge U, Conze J, Klosterhalfen B, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Öttinger AP, Schumpelick V (1996) Veränderung der bauchwandmechanik nach mesh-implantation. Langenbecks Arch Chir 381:323–332

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunnarsson U, Johansson M, Strigård K (2010) Biodex system-4 as a tool for assessment of abdominal muscle function. Validity and reliability for healthy volunteers and patients with giant ventral hernia. Abstract, 32nd congress of EHS, Istanbul, Turkey

  7. Ferrando JM, Vidal J, Armengol M, Huguet P, Gil J, Manero JM, Planell JA, Segarra A, Schwartz S, Arbos MA (2001) Early imaging of integration response to polypropylene mesh in abdominal wall by environmental scanning electron microscopy: comparison of two placement techniques and correlation with tensometric studies. World J Surg 25:840–847

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dvir Z (1995) Isokinetics: muscle testing, interpretation and clinical applications. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb G, Evans G (1995) Abdominal wall strength, bulging and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:616–619

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paajanen H, Hermunen H (2004) Long term pain and recurrence after repair of ventral incisional hernias by open mesh: clinical and MRI study. Langenbecks Arch Chir 389:366–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Gunnarsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, M., Gunnarsson, U. & Strigård, K. Different techniques for mesh application give the same abdominal muscle strength. Hernia 15, 65–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0745-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0745-1

Keywords

  • Mesh application
  • Muscle strength
  • Sublay
  • Onlay
  • Intraperitoneal
  • Biodex