Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1k Downloads
To determine the best surgical approach for the open repair of primary umbilical hernias.
Studies were identified through searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database, as well as hand-searching references. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing mesh to suture repair for primary umbilical hernias published between January 1965 and October 2009 were included. Data regarding the recurrence rate, complications, number of subjects, length of follow-up, size of hernia, and type of mesh were extracted. Log odds ratios were calculated and weighed by the Mantel–Haenszel method to obtain a pooled estimate with 95% confidence interval (CI). A fixed effects model was used.
Three RCTs and ten observational studies were identified. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for RCTs was 0.09 in favor of mesh (95% CI 0.02–0.39). The pooled OR for observational studies was 0.40 in favor of mesh (95% CI 0.21–0.75). There was no difference in complication rates between mesh and tissue repair in RCTs or observational studies.
The use of mesh in umbilical hernia repair results in decreased recurrence and similar wound complications rates compared to tissue repair for primary umbilical hernias.
KeywordsHernia Umbilical Mesh Herniorrhaphy Herniaplasty Meta-analysis
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Search strategies guidance: Mimi Doyle-Waters, MA, MLIS.
- 4.García-Ureña M, Rico Selas P, Seoane J, Marcello M, Moreno González E, Corral Sánchez M, Moreno Sanz C (1994) Hernia umbilical del adulto. Resultados a largo plazo en pacientes operados de urgencia. Cir Esp 56:302–306Google Scholar
- 6.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2009) Search filters. Available online at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html
- 7.Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chi CC, Lee CW, Wojnarowska F, Kirtschig G (2009) Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD007346Google Scholar
- 9.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews. Beyond the Basics: Improving Quality and Impact, July 2000, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- 22.Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M (2008) Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 44:855–859Google Scholar
- 23.Scott N, Go PMNYH, Graham P, McCormack K, Ross SJ, Grant A (2001) Open mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002197Google Scholar
- 24.den Hartog D, Dur AHM, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006438Google Scholar
- 27.Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-García J, Seco-Gil JL (2007) Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003769Google Scholar