Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicentric observational cohort study evaluating a composite mesh with incorporated oxidized regenerated cellulose in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A variety of newly developed mesh products have recently become available to use inside the peritoneal cavity. This analysis reports the first clinical data evaluating the experience with the use of Proceed® mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Patients and methods

During a 6-month period, 114 adult patients underwent a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using an intra-abdominal placement of a Proceed mesh. The operative procedure was stratified for all centers. Perioperatively, different parameters were evaluated considering the conversion rate to open procedure, complications such as seroma and hematoma, bowel lesions, urinary retention, acute, and chronic pain, mesh infection, and recurrences.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 45 years (range 19–84 years). There were no conversions to open repair and no mortality. Complications included 12 seromas/hematomas (four aspirated), chronic discomfort in two patients, and urinary retention in one patient. There have been four recurrences (3.5%), occurring 3, 4, 4, and 15 months after surgery, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 27 months (range 12–38 months). There have been no documented infections of the mesh.

Conclusions

This multicentric study documents a favorable experience using large-pore mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. There were no major complications related to the mesh. Technical advantages considering mesh handling and long-term advantages considering chronic pain might be of interest with the use of this lightweight mesh for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zerey M, Heniford BT (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for ventral hernia repair—which is best? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:372–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kulkarni MP, Pawar DK (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1839–1845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lomanto D, Iyer SG, Shabbir A, Cheah WK (2006) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1030–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Olmi S, Erba L, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2006) Prospective clinical study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional and ventral hernia using a composite mesh: indications, complications and results. Hernia 1:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beldi G, Ipaktchi R, Wagner M, Gloor B, Candinas D (2006) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and cost effective. Surg Endosc 20:92–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Topart P, Ferrand L, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with the Goretex Dualmesh: long-term results and review of the literature. Hernia 9:348–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH 3rd, Sawan KT, Goldberg NH (2004) Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model. Hernia 8:336–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gal I, Balint A, Szabo L (2004) Results of laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias using an ePTFE-polypropylene composite mesh. Zentralbl Chir 129:92–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bellón JM, G-Honduvilla N, Jurado F, Carranza A, Buján J (2001) In vitro interaction of bacteria with polypropylene/ePTFE prostheses. Biomaterials 22:2021–2024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny RH, Mittermayr R, Walder N, Ohlinger W, Redl H (2006) Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:942–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Majercik S, Tsikitis V, Iannitti DA (2006) Strength of tissue attachment to mesh after ventral hernia repair with synthetic composite mesh in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:1671–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Peindl RD, Cobb WS, Austin CE, Cristiano JA, Norton JH, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model. Am Surg 72:808–813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burger JW, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR, ten Raa S, Jeekel J (2006) Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:1320–1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Farrakha M (2006) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-polyester mesh compound. Surg Endosc 20:820–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2000) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg 190:645–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morales-Conde S (2004) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: advances and limitations. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:191–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano A, Bustos M, Martín J, Morales-Méndez S (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures—double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Int Surg 90:S56–S60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morales-Conde S, Abdel-Lah A, Angoso-Catalina F, Blasco F, Feliu-Pala X, Fernández-Lobato R, González de Francisco T, Guerrero Fernández-Marcote JA, Martín-Gómez M, Martínez-García F, Morales-Méndez S, Murillo J, Oliva H, Pina J, Planellas X, Robres J, Rodero D, Ruiz-Castillo J, Serrantes-Gómez A, Tovar-Martínez JL, Tuca F, Utrera A (2005) Expert opinion on the basic surgical technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Cir Esp 78:214–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cobb WS, Burns JM, Peindl RD, Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vega-Ruiz V, García-Ureña MA, Díaz-Godoy A, Carnero FJ, Escribano Moriana A, Velasco García M (2006) Surveillance of shrinkage of polypropylene mesh used in the repair of ventral hernias. Cir Esp 80:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2004) In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs. Surg Endosc 18:211–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez R, Ramshaw BJ (2003) Comparison of tissue integration between polyester and polypropylene prostheses in the preperitoneal space. Am Surg 69:471–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164:965–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U, Weiss C, Polivoda M, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V (2005) Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. Surg Endosc 19:798–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eriksen JR, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2007) Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 11:481–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5:142–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Welty G, Klosterhalfen B (1999) Meshes within the abdominal wall. Chirurg 70:876–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10:247–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Ap AP, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2:103–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM (2002) Management of chronic postoperative pain following incisional hernia repair with Composix mesh: a report of two cases. Hernia 6:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Paajanen H, Hermunen H (2004) Long-term pain and recurrence after repair of ventral incisional hernias by open mesh: clinical and MRI study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, Acun Z, Comert M, Tascilar O, Cesur A, Cakmak GK, Gundogdu S (2006) Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:325–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2005) Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery 138:708–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Susmallian S, Gewurtz G, Ezri T, Charuzi I (2001) Seroma after laparoscopic repair of hernia with PTFE patch: is it really a complication? Hernia 5:139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Glantzounis G, Koulas S, Mavridou P, Gossios KI (2001) Seroma in laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Berrevoet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrevoet, F., Fierens, K., De Gols, J. et al. Multicentric observational cohort study evaluating a composite mesh with incorporated oxidized regenerated cellulose in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13, 23–27 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0418-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0418-5

Keywords

Navigation