Skip to main content
Log in

A survey of inguinal hernia repair in Wales with special emphasis on laparoscopic repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recently published its guidance on the use of laparoscopic repair for inguinal hernias. This study aimed to assess the likely uptake of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias in Wales. In addition the current practice with regards to day case surgery, use of local anaesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis, thromboembolic prophylaxis and advice regarding convalescence was assessed.

Methods

A postal questionnaire survey of all consultant surgeons (n = 91) in Wales was performed.

Results

There was a 70% (n = 67) response to the questionnaire. Fifteen percent of surgeons (n = 9) perform laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Wales; 10% of surgeons in Wales agreed with the NICE guidance. Lichtenstein hernia repair was the most commonly used the technique to repair primary inguinal hernias in Wales (82%). No surgeon currently is using a laparoscopic repair as the technique of choice for repair of primary inguinal hernias.

Eighteen percent of surgeons perform all the procedures as day cases; 15% of surgeons perform more than 90% of the procedures under local anaesthesia; 44% of surgeons do not use any form of thromboprophylaxis for elective inguinal hernia repair, while 78% of the surgeons used routine antibiotic prophylaxis. Post-operative advice regarding return to sedentary work and driving was highly variable (1–4 weeks), as was advice regarding heavy work and sport (2–12 weeks).

Conclusions

The uptake of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair in Wales is low. Only a minority of surgeons agree with the NICE guidance. Similarly the uptake of day case repair and the use of local anaesthesia are minimal. The use of antibiotic and thromboembolic prophylaxis is empirical and inconsistent. There is a need for evidence-based guidelines to standardise the antibiotic prophylaxis, TE prophylaxis and advice regarding post-operative advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2004). Final appraisal determination, laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair, NICE, London

  2. Ciampolini J, Boyce DE, Shandall AA (1998) Adult hernia surgery in Wales revisited: impact of the guidelines of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Am Coll Surg Engl 80:335–338

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (1993). Clinical guidelines on the management of groin hernias in adults. RCSE, London

  4. National Good Practice Guidance on preoperative assessment for day surgical units (September 2002). Modernisation agency: operating theatre pre-operative assessment programme

  5. Boyce DE, Shandall AA, Crosby DL (1995) Aspects of hernia surgery in Wales. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:198–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball EL, Sanjay P, Woodward A (2006). Comparison of buffered and unbuffered local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study. Hernia 10:175–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203, iii–iv

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003). Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001785

  9. Peschaud F, Alves A, Berdah S, Kianmanesh R, Laurent C, Mabrut JY, Mariette C, Meurette G, Pirro N, Veyrie N, Slim K; Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Digestive (SFCD) (2006). Indications for laparoscopy in general and gastrointestinal surgery. Evidence-based recommendations of the French Society of Digestive Surgery. J Chir (Paris) 143(1): 15–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Motson RW (2002) Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorrhaphy? B Med J 324:1092–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Slim K, Chipponi J (2006). Laparoscopic surgery today. Br J Surg 93(7): 779–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Knook MT, Stassen LPS, Bonjer HJ (2001). Impact of randomized trials on the application of endoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair in the Netherlands. Surg Endosc 15:55–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kehlet H and Bay Nielsen M (2005). Anaesthetic practice for groin hernia repair—a nation-wide study in Denmark 1998–2003. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49:143–146

  14. Sanjay P, Jones P, Woodward A (2006). Inguinal hernia repair: are ASA grades 3 and 4 patients suitable for day case hernia repair? Hernia 10:299–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanjay P, Woodward A. Inguinal hernia repair: local or general anaesthesia? Ann R Coll Surg Engl (In press)

  16. Cheek CM, Black NA, Devlin HB, Kingsnorth AN, Taylor RS, Watkin DFL (1998). Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(Suppl 1):S1–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Seco-Gil JL (2004). Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD003769

  18. Tzovaras G, Delikoukos S, Christodoulides G, Spyridakis M,Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C (2006). The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective tension-free mesh inguinal hernia repair: results of a single-centre prospective randomised trial. Int J Clin Pract [Epub ahead of print]

  19. Aufenacker TJ, Geldere DV, Bossers AN, Dekker B, Gouma DJ, Hiemstra E, Hofstede D, Juttmann J, Maduro JH (2004). The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia: a multicenter double blind randomised controlled trial. Ann Surg 240:955–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Metzer J, Nick L, Laidlaw I (2001). Guidelines for inguinal hernia repair in everyday practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL (1994). Returning to work after herniorrhaphy. BMJ 309:216–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor EW, Dewar EP (1983). Early return to work after repair of unilateral inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 70:599–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jorgensen LN, Wille-Jorgensen P, Hauch O (1993). Prophylaxis of post-operative embolism with low molecular weight heparins. Br J Surg 80:689–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Riber C, Alstrup N, Nymann T, Bogstad JW, Wille-Jorgensen P (1996). Post-operative thromboprophylaxis after day case herniorraphy. Br J Surg 83:420–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S, Gruger G, Sandblom G (1998). Methods of repair and risk for reoperation in Swedish hernia surgery from 1992 to 1996. Br J Surg 85:1689–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Woodward.

Additional information

Presented at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Edinburgh 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanjay, P., Woodward, A. A survey of inguinal hernia repair in Wales with special emphasis on laparoscopic repair. Hernia 11, 403–407 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0241-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0241-4

Keywords

Navigation