Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders as a method of follow-up in hernia surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We assessed the usefulness of a short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders for quality assessment in hernia surgery.

Methods

All patients (n = 1153) who underwent tension-free hernioplasty through an open preperitoneal approach between 1999 and 2003 received a six-item questionnaire with a covering letter and a stamped addressed envelope. Nonresponders received two successive new questionnaires and a telephone call.

Results

A total of 841 (72.9%) patients returned questionnaires after three reminders (512 after the first mailing, 205 after the second, and 124 after the third). Positive questionnaire answers were documented for 152 (18.1%) of repairs and negative answers for 689 (81.9%). Of the 152 patients who answered “yes” to either of the questions regarding recurrence and/or current pain, 91 declined clinical appointments, 24 could not be contacted by phone, and 37 underwent physical examination. Of the 312 patients who did not return the questionnaire, eight had died, 124 did not want to be visited, and 180 could not be located. The recurrence rate was 2.7% and the chronic pain rate 5.9%.

Conclusions

Repeat mailing was a useful strategy to improve response to self-administered postal questionnaires on hernia surgery quality assessment. However, contacting the group that responded with positive questionnaire answers was a poorly effective way to encourage subjects to come for a physical examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785

  2. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozuk M, Schuster R, Stewart D, Hicks K, Greaney G, Waxman K (2003) Disability and chronic pain after open mesh and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 69:839–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrøm J, Heidemann Andersen F, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T (2001) Quality assessment on 26 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358:1124–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aasvang EK, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2006) Pain and functional impairment 6 years after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 10:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P, Nyrén O, Gunnarsson U (2006) Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg 244:212–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aasvang EK, Møhl B, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2006) Pain related sexual dysfunction after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Pain 122:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JSK, van Geldere D, Koelemaij MJW, Obertop H (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair: questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 229 patients. Eur J Surg 164:533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kald A, Nilsson E (1991) Quality assessment in hernia surgery. Qual Assur Health Care 3:205–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halverson K, McVay CB (1970) Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty. A 22-year study of the authors’s methods. Arch Surg 101:127–135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy. A personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WCS (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 88:1122–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandblom G, Gruber G, Kald A, Nilsson E (2000) Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery. Eur J Surg 166:154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S (2001) Quality control and scientific rigor. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB, Phillips EH (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer, New York, pp 122–127

  16. Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE (2006) Maximising response to postal questionnaires––a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wantz GE (1993–1994) Technique of properitoneal hernioplasty. Unilateral reinforcement of the visceral sac with Mersilene giant prótesis (Article in French). Chirurgie 119:321–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Urschel JD (2005) How to analyze an article. World J Surg 29:557–560

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM (1995) The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results (Article in Spanish). Med Clin (Barc) 104:771–776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alonso J, Regidor E. Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodriguez C, de la Fuente L (1998) Population reference values of the Spanish version of the health questionnaire SF-36 (Article in Spanish). Med Clin (Barc) 111:410–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shuttleworth KED, Davies WH (1960) Treatment of inguinal herniae. Lancet 1:126–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawthorne G (2003) The effect of different methods of collecting data: mail, telephone and filter data collection issues in utility measurement. Qual Life Res 12:1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hair A, Duffy K, McLean J, Taylor S, Smith H, Walker A, MacIntyre IM, O’Dwyer PJ (2000) Groin hernia repair in Scotland. Br J Surg 87:1722–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. øberg E, Jacobsen B, Rosenberg J (2005) Chronic pain and recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15:267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marsden A (1959) The results of inguinal hernia repairs: a problem of assessment. Lancet 1(7070):461–462

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engström P, Gunnarson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberöd A (1998) Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery. A three-year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zdoisek JM, Enebog J, Wallon C, Kald A (2000) A prospective evaluation of the PerFix® Plug technique for groin hernia repair. Hernia 4:311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayagoitia JC, Prieto-Diaz Chavez E, Suarez D, Cisneros HA, Tene CE (2006) Predictive factors comparison of complications and recurrences in three tension-free herniorraphy techniques. Hernia 10:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD002197

  33. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Callensen T, Klarskov B, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardized recommendations: duration and reasons for delay return to work. Eur J Surg 165:236–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Marta Pulido for editing the manuscript and for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119–129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    M. López-Cano, R. Vilallonga, J. L. Sánchez & M. Armengol

  2. Department of Epidemiologica and Preventive Medicine, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Hermosilla

Authors
  1. M. López-Cano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Vilallonga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. L. Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Hermosilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Armengol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. López-Cano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-Cano, M., Vilallonga, R., Sánchez, J.L. et al. Short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders as a method of follow-up in hernia surgery. Hernia 11, 397–402 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0239-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0239-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation