Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A prospective comparison of local and spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 March 2007

Abstract

Aim

Today, in inguinal hernia repair, postoperative pain and costs are regarded as equally important issues as technique and recurrence rates. Postoperative pain is thought to vary according to the applied anesthesia method. As local anesthesia is reported to inflict less pain, its effects on early period post-operative complications should also be evaluated.

Methods

Two hundred patients, on whom Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair had been performed due to unilateral inguinal hernia between March 2004 and July 2005, were prospectively examined. The patients were randomized according to the anesthesia applied. They were divided into two groups: local anesthesia (LA) and spinal anesthesia (SA). The early post-operative complications, post-operative pain scores, and operation durations of the patients, were evaluated.

Results

Local anesthesia was found not to increase the post-operative complications; on the contrary, it was shown to prevent the complications of spinal anesthesia. Although visual analogue pain score (VAS) values at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-operation were found to be lower than the SA group, the difference between was not significant. Also, it was discovered that LA did not retard the operation duration.

Conclusion

Local anesthesia reduces post-operative pain and facilitates patients’ mobilization and discharge along with decreasing the early post-operative complications. Thus, LA is a safe and advantageous method to be applied in inguinal hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG (1986) Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg 71:1–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kark AE, Kurzer MN, Belsham PA (1998) Three thousand one hundred seventy-five primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg 186:447–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open tension-free repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichenstein technique. Eur J Surg 162:447–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendavid R (1997) Symposium on the management of inguinal hernias. 4. The Shouldice technique: a canon in hernia repair. Can J Surg 40:199–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (2001) One thousand consecutive inguinal hernia repairs under unmonitored local anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:1373–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingsnorth AN, Porter C, Bennett DH (2000) The benefit of a hernia service in a public hospital. Hernia 4:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordin P,Haapaniemi S, Linden WD, Nilsson E (2004) Choice of anesthesia and risk of reoperation for recurrence in groin hernia repair. Ann Surg 240:187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amid PL, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Step-by-step procedure. Ann Surg 220:735–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hemioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 8:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Callesen T, Bech K, Nielsen R, Andersen J, Hesselfeldt P, Roikjaer O et al (1998) Pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 85:1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutkow IM (1995) The recurrence rate in hernia surgery: How important is it? Arch Surg 130:575–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mokete M, Earnshaw JJ (2001) Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice. Postgrad Med J 77:188–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hair A, Duffy K, McLean J, Taylor S, Smith H, Walker A et al (2000) Hernia repair in Scotland. Br J Sur 87:1722–1726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teasdale C, McCrum AM, Williams NB, Horton RE (1982) A randomised controlled trial to compare local with general anaesthesia for short-stay inguinal hernia repair. Ann Roy Coll Surg Eng 64:238–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Young DV (1987) Comparison of local, spinal and general anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 153:560–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peiper C, Tons C, Schippers E, Busch F, Schumpelick V (1994) Local versus general anesthesia for Shouldice repair of the inguinal hernia. World J Surg 18:912–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Makuria T, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB (1979) Comparison between general and local anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 61:291–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Behnia R, Hashemi F, Stryker SJ, Ujiki GT, Poticha SM (1992) A comparison of general versus local anesthesia during inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:277–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozgun H, Kurt MN, Kurt İ, Cevikel MH (2002) Comparison of local, spinal and general anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Eur J Surg 168:455–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olshansky SJ (1997) The demography of aging. In: Cassel CK, Cohen HJ, Larson EB et al (eds) Geriatric medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gianetta E, de Cian F, Cuneo S, Friedman D, Vitale B, Marinari G et al (1997) Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg 84:983–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nehme AE (1983) Groin hernias in elderly patients. Management and prognosis. Am J Surg 146:257–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan JA, Ayde BA, Jolly PC, Mulroy MF (1984) Outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy with both regional and local anesthesia. Am J Surg 148:313–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tingwald GR, Cooperman M (1982) Inguinal and femoral hernia repair in geriatric patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154:704 –706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Dwye PJ, Serpell MG, Millar K, Paterson C, Young D, Hair A et al (2003) Local or general anesthesia for open hernia repair: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bendavid R (1994) Seromas and prostheses, Part I. In: Bendavid R (ed) Prostheses and abdominal wall hernias. RG Landes, Austin, pp 367–369

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osman Kuruahvecioglu.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0213-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gultekin, F.A., Kuruahvecioglu, O., Karamercan, A. et al. A prospective comparison of local and spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 11, 153–156 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0166-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0166-3

Keywords

Navigation