Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anthropometric characteristics of the pubic arch and proper function of the defense mechanisms against hernia formation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 33 inguinal regions, we determined the anthropometric characteristics of the pubic arch and the anatomic structures of the suprainguinal space and assessed whether there is a relationship between anatomic features and function of the defense mechanisms. There was a low position of the pubic arch (pubic tubercle and interspinal line distance >75 mm) in 23 cases. The low-pubic-arch group showed a significantly longer inguinal ligament and a greater angle made by the superior border of the suprainguinal space and the inguinal ligament at its medial insertion. The position of the pubic arch correlated significantly with the diameter of the internal ring, the length of the inguinal ligament, and the angle made by the superior border of the suprainguinal space and the medial insertion of the inguinal ligament. A low pubic arch would represent an unfavorable condition for an adequate function of the anatomic defense mechanism against hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson J (2001) Mechanisms of hernia formation. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB, Phillips EH (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: Principles and Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 133–137

  2. Fruchaud H (1953) The effect of the upright position proper to man upon the anatomy of the inguinal region: surgical consequences; anatomic bases of surgical treatment of inguinal hernia [Article in French]. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 63:652–661

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keith A (1923) On the origin and nature of hernia. Br J Surg 11:455–475

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lytle WJ (1945) The internal inguinal ring. Br J Surg 128:441–446

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ajmani ML, Ajmani K (1983) The anatomical basis for the inguinal hernia. Anat Anz 153:245–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmermann LM, Anson BJ (1967) Anatomy and surgery of hernia. 2nd edition. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 136–140

  7. Zinanovic S (1968) The anatomical basis for the high frequency of the inguinal and femoral hernia in Uganda. East Afr Med J 45:41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ledinsky M, Matejčić A, De Syo D, Doko M (1998) Some structural characteristics of the inguinal region in the Northern Croatia. Coll Antropol 22:515–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdalla RZ, Mittelstaedt WE (2001) The importance of the Hessert’s triangle in the etiology of inguinal hernia. Hernia 5:119–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McArdle G (1997) Is inguinal hernia a defect in human evolution and would this insight improve concepts for methods of surgical repair? Clin Anat 10:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Avisse C, Delattre JF, Flament JB (2000) The inguinal ring. Surg Clin North Am 80:49–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponka JL (1980) Hernias of the abdominal wall. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, pp 82–89

  13. Harris FI, White AS (1937) The length of the inguinal ligament in the differentiation between direct and indirect inguinal hernia. JAMA 109:1900–1903

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferraz de Carvalho CC, Souza RR, Fernandes PMP, Waksman H, Fernandes VC (1987) The relationship between anthropometric parameters and measurements of the human inguinal region. Surg Radiol Anat 9:281:285

  15. Peri G, Farina F, Marcianó V, Ridola C, Diana G, Arcara M, Guercio G, Sommariva V (1996) Clinical and anatomic features of the inguinal canal during hernia. Ital J Anat Embryol 101:69–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marta Pulido, M.D., for editing the manuscript and for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119–129, 08035 , Barcelona, Spain

    M. López-Cano & M. Armengol-Carrasco

  2. Department of Anatomy Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique

    E. G. Munhequete

  3. Unit of Biostatistics Service of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Hermosilla-Pérez

  4. Department of Morphological Sciences Unit of Anatomy and Embryology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    A. Rodríguez-Baeza

Authors
  1. M. López-Cano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. G. Munhequete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Hermosilla-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Armengol-Carrasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Rodríguez-Baeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. López-Cano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-Cano, M., Munhequete, E.G., Hermosilla-Pérez, E. et al. Anthropometric characteristics of the pubic arch and proper function of the defense mechanisms against hernia formation. Hernia 9, 56–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0282-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0282-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation