Abstract
Inguinal hernia (IH) surgery has changed substantially in the past decade. Conventional (nonmesh) techniques have largely given way to prostheses. This study’s aim was to analyse whether changes in technique used for IH repair influenced the operation rate for recurrence. A retrospective study was performed on all adult males who had undergone IH surgery in the Amsterdam region during the calendar years of 1994, 1996, 1999, and 2001. Data were obtained for 3,649 subjects and included patient demographics, hernia type, and surgical technique. We observed a decrease in the use of conventional techniques and a significant increase (P<0.05) in the use of prosthetic materials. The number of operations performed for recurrent hernia decreased from 19.5% (216/1,108) in 1994, to 16.8% 197/1,170) in 1996, to 14.0% (152/1,088) in 1999, and to 14.1% (40/283) in 2001. When comparing 1999 and 2001 with 1994, there was a significant decrease in operations performed for recurrent hernia (P=0.005). There was also a significant increase in supervision of the surgical resident by a surgeon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet M, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Heidemann Andersen F, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358:1124–1128
Sandblom G, Gruber G, Kald A, Nilsson E (2000) Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery. Eur J Surg 166:154–158
Haapaniemi S, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, Nilsson E (2001) Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair. Ann Surg 234:122–126
Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S, Gruber G, Sandblom G (1998) Methods of repair and risk for reoperation in Swedish hernia surgery from 1992 to 1996. Br J Surg 85:1686–1691
Hair A, Duffy K, McLean J, Taylor S, Smith H, Walker A, MacIntyre IM, O’Dwyer PJ (2000) Groin hernia repair in Scotland. Br J Surg 87:1722–1726
Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JS, van Geldere D, Koelemaij MJ, Obertop H (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 164:533–6
Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28
Simons MP, Vos PM, van Geldere D, Hoitsma HF, Obertop H (1996) More recurrences than expected following inguinal hernia surgery. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 140:2506–9
Schoots IG, van Dijkman B, Butzelaar RM, van Geldere D, Simons MP (2001) Inguinal hernia repair in the Amsterdam region 1994–1996. Hernia 5:37–40
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair step-by-step procedure. Ann Surg 220:735–737
Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:854–859
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials leased on individual patient data. Hernia 6:130–136
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh, Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–332
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: Meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2–10
Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: An overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7:13–16
Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: Its inception, evolution and principles. Hernia 8:1–7
Bay-Nielsen M, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Kehlet H (2001) Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure Am J Surg 182:134–136
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the surgeons in participating hospitals in the Netherlands for sharing their data. Participating centers (alphabetical order): Prof. Dr. H. Obertop, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam; Dr. D. van Geldere, Amstelveen Hospital Amstelveen; P.J. Tolenaar, Boven-IJ Hospital Amsterdam; Dr. D. de Jong, Free University Hospital Amsterdam; Dr. N.J.M. Out, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Amsterdam; Dr. B.J. Dwars, Slotervaart Hospital Amsterdam; Dr. W.F. van Tets, St Lucas-Andreas Hospital Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aufenacker, T.J., de Lange, D.H., Burg, M.D. et al. Hernia surgery changes in the Amsterdam region 1994–2001: Decrease in operations for recurrent hernia. Hernia 9, 46–50 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0279-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0279-5