Advertisement

Ecosystems

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Ecological Consequences of Animal Migration: Prey Partial Migration Affects Predator Ecology and Prey Communities

  • Joan H. Hansen
  • Christian Skov
  • Henrik Baktoft
  • Christer Brönmark
  • Ben B. Chapman
  • Kaj Hulthén
  • Lars-Anders Hansson
  • P. Anders Nilsson
  • Jakob BrodersenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Patterns of animal migration and the ecological forces that shape them have been studied for centuries. Yet ecological impacts caused by the migration, such as altered predator–prey interactions and effects on community structure, remain poorly understood. This is to a large extent due to the scarcity of naturally replicated migration systems with negative controls, that is, ecosystems without migration. In this study, we tested whether partial migration of certain species within the overall prey community affects foraging ecology of top predators and thereby alters energy pathways in food webs. We carried out the study in independent replicated freshwater lake systems, four with and four without opportunity for prey migration. Specifically, we compared predator foraging mode in lakes where cyprinid prey fish perform seasonal partial migrations into connected streams with lakes lacking migratory opportunities for prey fish. We found clear seasonal bottom-up effects of prey migration on predators, including changes in size structure and total biomass of ingested prey, size-specific changes in littoral versus pelagic origin of diet, and a higher degree of feast-and-famine for predators in systems with migratory prey. Our analyses further showed that partially migratory prey species constitute a larger part of the prey community in systems that allow migration. Hence, prey migrations have important implications for predator foraging ecology and may cause seasonal shifts in the importance of their supporting energy pathways. We suggest that such bottom-up effects of partial migration may be a widespread phenomenon both in aquatic and in terrestrial ecosystems.

Keywords

bottom-up effects freshwater fish movement ecology predation pike Esox lucius 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the technicians at DTU AQUA for their invaluable expertise during sampling. We thank Serge Robert and Carsten Schubert at Eawag Department of Surface Waters Research and Management for isotope analyses support. The study received financial support from the Danish National Fishing Licence Funds and was carried out according to the guidelines of Danish and Swedish ethical requirements and animal welfare legislation. JB was funded by a Swedish Research Council (VR) repatriation grant.

Supplementary material

10021_2019_402_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1115 kb)

References

  1. Alerstam T, Hedenström A, Åkesson S. 2003. Long-distance migration: Evolution and determinants. Oikos 103:247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altizer S, Bartel R, Han BA. 2011. Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science 331:296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong JB, Schindler DE. 2011. Excess digestive capacity in predators reflects a life of feast and famine. Nature 476:84–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer S, Hoye BJ. 2014. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344:1242552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowler DE, Benton TG. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biological Reviews 80:205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodersen J, Ådahl E, Brönmark C, Hansson L-A. 2008a. Ecosystem effects of partial fish migration in lakes. Oikos 117:40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A, Skov C, Brönmark C. 2008b. Condition-dependent individual decision-making determines cyprinid partial migration. Ecology 89:1195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodersen J, Nicolle AP, Nilsson PA, Skov C, Brönmark C, Hansson L-A. 2011a. Interplay between temperature, fish partial migration and trophic dynamics. Oikos 120:1838–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodersen J, Rodriguez-Gil JL, Jönsson M, Hansson L-A, Brönmark C, Nilsson PA, Berglund O. 2011b. Temperature and resource availability may interactively affect over-wintering success of juvenile fish in a changing climate. PloS ONE 6:e24022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brodersen J, Chapman BB, Nilsson PA, Skov C, Hansson LA, Brönmark C. 2014. Fixed and flexible: coexistence of obligate and facultative migratory strategies in a freshwater fish. PloS ONE 9:e90294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodersen J, Howeth JG, Post DM. 2015. Emergence of a novel prey life history promotes contemporary sympatric diversification in a top predator. Nature Communications 6:8115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brönmark C, Skov C, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A. 2008. Seasonal migration determined by a trade-off between predator avoidance and growth. PLoS ONE 3:e1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brönmark C, Hulthén K, Nilsson PA, Skov C, Hansson L-A, Brodersen J, Chapman BB. 2014. There and back again: migration in freshwater fishes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91:1–13.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman BB, Hulthén K, Blomqvist DR, Hansson LA, Nilsson JÅ, Brodersen J, Brönmark C. 2011. To boldly go: individual differences in boldness influence migratory tendency. Ecology Letters 14:871–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman BB, Skov C, Hulthén K, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A, Brönmark C. 2012. Partial migration in fishes: definitions, methodologies and taxonomic distribution. Journal of Fish Biology 81:479–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman BB, Hulthén K, Brönmark C, Nilsson PA, Skov C, Hansson L-A, Brodersen J. 2015. Shape up or ship out: migratory behaviour predicts morphology across spatial scale in freshwater fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 84:1187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dingle H, Drake VA. 2007. What is migration? Bioscience 57:113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elbroch LM, Lendrum PE, Newby J, Quigley H, Craighead D. 2013. Seasonal foraging ecology of non-migratory cougars in a system with migrating prey. PLoS One 8:83375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faulks L, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P, Östman Ö. 2015. Genetic and morphological divergence along the littoral–pelagic axis in two common and sympatric fishes: perch, Perca fluviatilis (Percidae) and roach, Rutilus rutilus (Cyprinidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114:929–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE. 1988. Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3:237–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fryxell JM, Mosser A, Sinclair ARE, Packer C. 2007. Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics. Nature 449:1041–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furey NB, Hinch SG, Mesa MG, Beauchamp DA. 2016. Piscivorous fish exhibit temperature-influenced binge feeding during an annual prey pulse. Journal of Animal Ecology 85:1307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gelin ML, Branch LC, Thornton DH, Novaro AJ, Gould MJ, Caragiulo A. 2017. Response of pumas (Puma concolor) to migration of their primary prey in Patagonia. PLoS ONE 12:e0188877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansson L-A, Åkesson S. 2014. Animal movement across scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hays GC. 2003. A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations. Hydrobiologia 503:163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilderbrand GV, Farley SD, Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Titus K, Servheen C. 1996. Use of stable isotopes to determine diets of living and extinct bears. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74:2080–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hjelm J, van de Weerd GH, Sibbing FA. 2003. Functional link between foraging performance, functional morphology, and diet shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:700–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holtgrieve GW, Schindler DE. 2011. Marine-derived nutrients, bioturbation, and ecosystem metabolism: reconsidering the role of salmon in streams. Ecology 92:373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hulthén K, Chapman BB, Nilsson PA, Vinterstare J, Hansson LA, Skov C, Brönmark C. 2015. Escaping peril: perceived predation risk affects migratory propensity. Biology Letters 11:20150466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jepsen N, Berg S. 2002. The use of winter refuges by roach tagged with miniature radio transmitters. Hydrobiologia 483:167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Light RW, Adler PH, Arnold DE. 1983. Evaluation of gastric lavage for stomach analyses. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3:81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metz MC, Smith DW, Vucetich JA, Stahler DR, Peterson RO. 2012. Seasonal patterns of predation for gray wolves in the multi-prey system of Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:553–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nilsson PA, Brönmark C. 2000. Prey vulnerability to a gape-size limited predator: behavioural and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. Oikos 88:539–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen-Smith N. 2008. Changing vulnerability to predation related to season and sex in an African ungulate assemblage. Oikos 117:602–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Post DM. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Post DM, Palkovacs EP, Schielke EG, Dodson SI. 2008. Intraspecific phenotypic variation in a predator affects zooplankton community structure and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology 89:2019–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team. (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
  38. Samelius G, Alisauskas RT, Larivière S. 2011. Seasonal pulses of migratory prey and annual variation in small mammal abundance affect abundance and reproduction by arctic foxes. Polar biology 34:1475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sand H, Wabakken P, Zimmermann B, Johansson O, Pedersen HC, Liberg O. 2008. Summer kill rates and predation pattern in wolf—moose system: can we rely on winter estimates? Oecologia 156:53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schielke EG, Post DM. 2010. Size matters: comparing stable isotope ratios of tissue plugs and whole organisms. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 8:348–51.Google Scholar
  41. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Gende SM, Francis TB, Palen WJ. 2003. Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinclair ARE. 2003. Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 358:1729–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skov C, Lousdal O, Johansen PH, Berg S. 2003. Piscivory of 0+ pike (Esox lucius L.) in a small eutrophic lake and its implications for biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia 506:481–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skov C, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A, Brönmark C. 2008. Inter- and size-specific patterns of fish seasonal migration between a shallow lake and its streams. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 17:406–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skov C, Aarestrup K, Baktoft H, Brodersen J, Brönmark C, Hansson LA, Nilsson PA. 2010. Influences of environmental cues, migration history, and habitat familiarity on partial migration. Behavioral Ecology 21:1140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skov C, Baktoft H, Brodersen J, Brönmark C, Chapman BB, Hansson L-A, Nilsson PA. 2011. Sizing up our enemy: individual predation vulnerability predicts migratory probability. Proceedings of the royal society b 278:1414–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skov C, Jepsen N, Baktoft H, Jansen T, Pedersen S, Koed A. 2014. Cormorant predation on PIT-tagged lake fish. Journal of Limnology 73:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Subalusky AL, Dutton CL, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Post DM. 2017. Annual mass drownings of the Serengeti wildebeest migration influence nutrient cycling and storage in the Mara River. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:7647–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Temple GK, Johnston IA. 1997. The thermal dependence of fast-start performance in fish. Journal of Thermal Biology 22:391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson JM, Bergersen EP, Carlson CA, Kaeding LR. 1991. Role of size, condition, and lipid content in the overwinter survival of age− 0 Colorado Squawfish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:346–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y. 2002. Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83:2152–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan H. Hansen
    • 1
  • Christian Skov
    • 1
  • Henrik Baktoft
    • 1
  • Christer Brönmark
    • 2
  • Ben B. Chapman
    • 3
  • Kaj Hulthén
    • 2
  • Lars-Anders Hansson
    • 2
  • P. Anders Nilsson
    • 2
    • 4
  • Jakob Brodersen
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.National Institute of Aquatic ResourcesTechnical University of Denmark (DTU)SilkeborgDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Biology/Aquatic EcologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Division of Evolution and Genomics, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  4. 4.Department of Environmental and Life Sciences - BiologyKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden
  5. 5.Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Center for Ecology, Evolution and BiogeochemistryEAWAG Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyKastanienbaumSwitzerland
  6. 6.Division of Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations