Skip to main content
Log in

Risks of Neglecting Phenology When Assessing Climatic Controls of Primary Production

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the effect that integrating annual aboveground net primary production (ANPP) along different 12-month periods has on temporal models of productivity (ANPP as a linear function of annual precipitation). We studied Argentinean Patagonia, which encompasses a variety of climates and biomes. Using MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to estimate green biomass, we assessed the date of maximum annual NDVI for 2000–2016. One quarter of Patagonia (West/South region) exhibited a well-defined seasonality, with maximum NDVI during spring–summer, whereas the rest (Central/East region) showed a much less well-defined maximum NDVI, generally during fall. Then we calculated temporal models for each pixel, considering both annual and seasonal precipitation (PPT), in two ways: (i) centered models, integrating NDVI for a period centered at the actual growing season, that is, July–June for West/South region and January–December for Central/East region, and (ii) displaced models, switching the NDVI integration period. Our results indicate that, with the centered models, 84% of the Central/East region exhibited significant temporal models, but only 52% of the West/South region did. For the displaced models, 60% (40%) of pixels of Central/East (West/South) region changed their best predictor of ANPP. In general, the best predictor changed from current-year PPT to current-plus-previous-year PPT or from current-year fall to previous-year fall. Our results suggest that more attention must be paid in choosing the integration period for annual ANPP. This is more than a formal matter since the putative best predictor of ANPP can dramatically change depending on the assumed phenology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena M, Giordani E, Radice S. 2013. Phenological growth and development stages of the native Patagonian fruit species Berberis buxifolia Lam. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 11:1323–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertiller MB, Beeskow AM, Coronato F. 1991. Seasonal environmental variation and plant phenology in arid Patagonia Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 21:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertiller MB, Irisarri MP, Ares JO. 1990. Phenology of Festuca pallescens in relation to topography in north-western Patagonia. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:579–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisigato AJ, Hardtke L, del Valle HF. 2013. Soil as a capacitor: considering soil water content improves temporal models of productivity. Journal of Arid Environments 98:88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisigato AJ, Lopez Laphitz RM. 2009. Ecohydrological effects of grazing-induced degradation in the Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Austral Ecology 34:545–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella MV, Bertiller MB. 2008. Plant phenology, leaf traits and leaf litterfall of contrasting life forms in the arid Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Shi W, Xie P, Silva VBS, Kousky VE, Higgins RW, Janowiak JE. 2008. Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based analyses of global daily precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damascos MA, Barthélémy D, Ezcurra C, Martínez P, Brion C. 2008. Plant phenology, shoot growth, and branching pattern in Mulinum spinosum (Apiaceae), a cushion shrub of the arid Patagonian steppe of Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 72:1977–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricante I, Oesterheld M, Paruelo JM. 2009. Annual and seasonal variation of NDVI explained by current and previous precipitation across Northern Patagonia. Journal of Arid Environments 73:745–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensholt R, Langanke T, Rasmussen K, Reenberg A, Prince SD, Tucker C, Scholes RJ, Le QB, Bondeau A, Eastman R, Epstein H, Gaughan AE, Hellden U, Mbow C, Olsson L, Paruelo J, Schweitzer C, Seaquist J, Wessels K. 2012. Greenness in semi-arid areas across the globe 1981–2007—an Earth Observing Satellite based analysis of trends and drivers. Remote Sensing of Environment 121:144–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández RJ. 2007. On the frequent lack of response of plants to rainfall events in arid areas. Journal of Arid Environments 68:688–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitán JJ, Bran D, Oliva G, Ciari G, Nakamatsu V, Salomone J, Ferrante D, Buono G, Massara V, Humano G, Celdrán D, Opazo W, Maestre FT. 2013. Evaluating the performance of multiple remote sensing indices to predict the spatial variability of ecosystem structure and functioning in Patagonian steppes. Ecological Indicators 34:181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitán JJ, Oliva GE, Bran DE, Maestre FT, Aguiar MR, Jobbágy EG, Buono GG, Ferrante D, Nakamatsu VB, Ciari G, Salomone JM, Massara V. 2014. Vegetation structure is as important as climate for explaining ecosystem function across Patagonian rangelands. Journal of Ecology 102:1419–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golluscio RA, Escalada VS, Pérez J. 2009. Minimal plant responsiveness to summer water pulses: ecophysiological constraints of three species of semiarid Patagonia. Rangeland Ecology & Management 62:171–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golluscio RA, Oesterheld M, Aguiar MR. 2005. Relationship between phenology and life form: a test with 25 Patagonian species. Ecography 28:273–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete A, Didan K, van Leeuwen W, Miura T, Glenn E. 2010. MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, Vol. 11. New York: Springer. p 579–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Sala OE. 2000. Controls of grass and shrub aboveground production in the Patagonian steppe. Ecological Applications 10:541–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Sala OE, Paruelo JM. 2002. Patterns and controls of primary production in the Patagonian steppe: a remote sensing approach. Ecology 83:307–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Carroll CJW, Fahey TJ. 2014. Patterns and controls of terrestrial primary production in a changing world. In: Monson R, Ed. Ecology and the environment. New York: Springer. p 205–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowaljow E, Fernández RJ. 2011. Differential utilization of a shallow-water pulse by six shrub species in the Patagonian steppe. Journal of Arid Environments 75:211–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröpfl AI, Deregibus VA, Cecchi GA. 2007. Disturbios en una estepa arbustiva del Monte: Cambios en la vegetación. Ecología Austral 17:257–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth WK, Sala OE. 1992. Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecological Applications 2:397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • León RJC, Bran D, Collantes M, Paruelo JM, Soriano A. 1998. Grandes unidades de vegetación de la Patagonia extra andina. Ecología Austral 8:125–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliano PN, Breshears DD, Fernández RJ, Jobbágy EG. 2015. Rainfall intensity switches ecohydrological runoff/runon redistribution patterns in dryland vegetation patches. Ecological Applications 25:2094–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martiny N, Camberlin P, Richard Y, Philippon N. 2006. Compared regimes of NDVI and rainfall in semi-arid regions of Africa. International Journal of Remote Sensing 27:5201–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzabal M, Clavijo J, Oakley L, Biganzoli F, Tognetti P, Barberis I, Maturo HM, Aragón R, Campanello PI, Prado D, Oesterheld M, León RJC. 2018. Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina. Ecología Austral 28:40–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Aguiar MR, Golluscio RA, León RJC, Pujol G. 1993. Environmental controls of NDVI dynamics in Patagonia based on NOAA-AVHRR satellite data. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:425–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Beltran A, Jobbagy E, Sala OE, Golluscio RA. 1998a. The climate of Patagonia: general patterns and controls on biotic processes. Ecología Austral 8:85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Golluscio RA, Guerschman JP, Cesa A, Jouve VV, Garbulsky MF. 2004. Regional scale relationships between ecosystem structure and functioning: the case of the Patagonian steppes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13:385–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Jobbágy EG, Sala OE. 1998b. Biozones of Patagonia (Argentina). Ecología Austral 8:145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Sala OE. 1999. Grassland precipitation-use efficiency varies across a resource gradient. Ecosystems 2:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reynolds JF, Kemp PR, Ogle K, Fernández RJ. 2004. Modifying the ‘pulse–reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. Oecologia 141:194–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch VE. 1993. Altitudinal variation in the phenology of Nothofagus pumilio in Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 66:131–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE. 2001. Productivity of temperate grasslands. In: Roy J, Saugier B, Mooney HA, Eds. Terrestrial Global Productivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 285–300.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann L, Jobbágy E, Peters D. 2012. Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 367:3135–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma DP, Munson SM, Irvine KM, Witwicki DL, Bunting EL. 2016. Semi-arid vegetation response to antecedent climate and water balance windows. Applied Vegetation Science 19:413–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbesselt J, Hyndman R, Newnham G, Culvenor D. 2010. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment 114:106–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verón SR, Paruelo JM. 2010. Desertification alters the response of vegetation to changes in precipitation. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:1233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M. 1979. Elements of a theory of vegetation dynamics in arid rangelands. Israel Journal of Botany 28:169–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand T, Snyman HA, Kellner K, Paruelo JM. 2004. Do grasslands have a memory: modeling phytomass production of a semiarid South African grassland. Ecosystems 7:243–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JC, Bestelmeyer BT, Peters DPC. 2012. Spatiotemporal patterns of production can be used to detect state change across an arid landscape. Ecosystems 15:34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Chen M, Shi W. 2010. CPC unified gauge-based analysis of global daily precipitation. In: 24th Conference on Hydrology. Atlanta, GA: American Meteorological Society.

  • Xie P, Chen M, Yang S, Yatagai A, Hayasaka T, Fukushima Y, Liu C. 2007. A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over east Asia. Journal of Hydrometeorology 8:607–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahdjian L, Sala OE. 2006. Vegetation structure constrains primary production response to water availability in the Patagonian steppe. Ecology 87:952–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and reviewers for suggestions and SMN and INTA for access to their climatic databases. LMB fellowship was supported by CONICET (National Research Council of Argentina) and Chubut Province. This Research was funded by PIP 11220120100592CO, UNPSJB 10/C324 and UBACyT 20020170100749BA. This paper was written within the framework of the PUE-IPEEC-2016 22920160100044. AJB and RJF are CONICET researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro J. Bisigato.

Additional information

Author Contributions

LMB analyzed datasets and wrote paper. RJF and AJB designed research and wrote paper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 374 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bandieri, L.M., Fernández, R.J. & Bisigato, A.J. Risks of Neglecting Phenology When Assessing Climatic Controls of Primary Production. Ecosystems 23, 164–174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00393-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00393-7

Keywords

Navigation