Resistance, Resilience or Change: Post-disturbance Dynamics of Boreal Forests After Insect Outbreaks
Understanding and measuring forest resistance and resilience have emerged as key priorities in ecology and management, particularly to maintain forest functioning. The analysis of the factors involved in a forest’s ability to cope with disturbances is key in identifying forest vulnerability to environmental change. In this study, we apply a procedure based on combining pathway analyses of forest composition and structure with quantitative indices of resistance and resilience to disturbances. We applied our approach to boreal forests affected by a major spruce budworm outbreak in the province of Quebec (Canada). We aimed to identify the main patterns of forest dynamics and the environmental factors affecting these responses. To achieve this goal, we developed quantitative metrics of resistance and resilience. We then compared forests with different pre-disturbance conditions and explored the factors influencing their recovery following disturbance. We found that post-outbreak forest dynamics are determined by distinct resistance and resilience patterns according to dominant species and stand composition and structure. Black spruce forests are highly resistant to spruce budworm outbreaks, but this resistance is conditioned by the length of the defoliation period, with long outbreaks having the potential to lead the system to collapse. In contrast, balsam fir forests easily change to a different composition after outbreaks but are highly resilient when mixed with hardwood species. Overall, the severity of the disturbance and the tree species affected are the main drivers contributing to boreal forest resistance and resilience. Our procedure is valuable to understand post-disturbance dynamics of a broad range of communities and to guide management strategies focused on enhancing the resistance and resilience of the system.
Keywordsbiotic disturbance ecosystem collapse forest dynamics resilience resistance spruce budworm stability successional pathways
This study was funded by MINECO via EST_RES Project (AGL2015-70425-R) and BIOCLIM (CGL2015-6741R) and the EC through the Marie Curie IRSES Project NEWFORESTS (PIRSES-GA-2013-612645) and the ERA-NET Foresterra Project INFORMED (Grant Number: 29183). MINECO provided MSP with support through a predoctoral contract (BES-2013-063019) and AA through a Juan de la Cierva fellowship (FJCI-2014-20739). We thank Mélanie Desrochers and Aurélie Terrier for technical support and three anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.
The data used in this study are publicly available on the Données Québec webpage (https://www.donneesquebec.ca/fr/).
- Ayres MP, Lombardero MJ. 2017. Forest pests and their management in the Anthropocene. Can J For Res 07:1–10.Google Scholar
- Baskerville GL. 1975. Spruce budworm: Super Silviculturist. For Chron:138–40.Google Scholar
- Despland E. 2017. Effects of phenological synchronization on caterpillar early-instar survival under a changing climate. Can J For Res:1–8.Google Scholar
- De Cáceres M, Font X, Oliva F. 2010. The management of vegetation classifications with fuzzy clustering. J Veg Sci. http://sites.google.com/site/miqueldecaceres/.
- De Grandpré L, Kneeshaw DD, Perigon S, Boucher D, Marchand M, Pureswaran D, Girardin MP. 2018. Adverse climatic periods precede and amplify defoliator-induced tree mortality in eastern boreal North America. J Ecol 0:1–16.Google Scholar
- Hennigar CR, MacLean DA, Quiring DT, Kershaw JA. 2008. Differences in Spruce Budworm Defoliation among Balsam Fir and White, Red, and Black Spruce. For Sci 54:158–66.Google Scholar
- Kneeshaw D, Sturtevant BR, Cooke B, Work TT, Pureswaran D, De Grandpre L, MacLean D. 2015. Insect Disturbances in Forest Ecosystems. In: Corlett RT, Bergeron Y, Eds. Peh KS-H. Oxford, UK: Routledge Handbook of Forest Ecology. Routledge.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon WE, MacLean DA. 2003. The influence of forest and stand conditions on spruce budworm defoliation in New Brunswick, Canada. For Sci 49:657–67.Google Scholar
- Ministère des Forêts de la Faune et des Parcs. 2016. Données sur les perturbations naturelles – insecte: tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette. Jeu de données, version shapefile. https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/fr/dataset/donnees-sur-les-perturbations-naturelles-insecte-tordeuse-des-bourgeons-de-lepinette.
- Ministère des Ressources Naturelles. 2013. Données descriptives des placettes-échantillons permanentes. Quebec: Direction des inventaires forestiers.Google Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2017. vegan: Community Ecology Package.:1–292. https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
- Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Procter D, Eigenbrod F, Freckleton R, Hector A, Orme CDL, Petchey OL, Proença V, Raffaelli D, Suttle KB, Mace GM, Martín-López B, Woodcock BA, Bullock JM. 2015. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends Ecol Evol 30:673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pothier D, Savard F. 1998. Actualisation des tables de production pour les principales espèces forestières du Québec. Québec, Québec: Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune du Québec.Google Scholar
- Puettmann KJ. 2011. Silvicultural Challenges and Options in the Context of Global Change : “Simple” Fixes and Opportunities for New Management Approaches. J For 109:321–31.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/.
- Régnière J, Bolstad P. 1994. Statistical Simulation of Daily Air Temperature Patterns Eastern North America to Forecast Seasonal Events in Insect Pest Management. Environ Entomol 23:1368 LP-80.Google Scholar
- Saucier JP, Robitaille A, Grondin P, Bergeron JF, Gosselin J. 2011. Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional (4 version).Google Scholar
- Willis KJ, Jeffers ES, Tovar C. 2018. What makes a terrestrial ecosystem resilient? Science (80-) 359:988–9.Google Scholar