, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 257–265 | Cite as

Long-Term Effects of Fire on Vegetation Structure and Predicted Fire Behavior in Wyoming Big Sagebrush Ecosystems

  • Schyler A. Reis
  • Lisa M. EllsworthEmail author
  • J. Boone Kauffman
  • David W. Wrobleski


Fire historically occurred across the sagebrush steppe, but little is known about how patterns of post-fire fuel accumulation influence future fire in Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) communities. To quantify change in fuel composition and structure in intact sagebrush ecosystems, we sampled 17 years following prescribed fire in eight approximately 400 ha plots (4 burned, 4 unburned control) at Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge, OR, USA. Fuels data were used to model potential fire behavior in burn and control plots across four environmental scenarios that mimic drying of fuels through the fire season. Seventeen years after fire total fuel loads were 7 × higher in controls (6015 kg ha−1) than burned plots (831 kg ha−1; P < 0.01). Herbaceous fuels were 5 times greater in burns (P < 0. 01). Shrub fuel was nearly 10 times higher in unburned plots (P < 0.01), and litter under shrubs in controls was 3.75 times greater than in burns (P < 0.01). Potential fire behavior was lower in burned plots than in unburned controls across all environmental scenarios. In the driest scenario, potential rate of spread ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 m min−1 in burns and 2.7 to 5.5 m min−1 in controls (P < 0.01). Maintaining resilience in these ecosystems at multiple spatial and temporal scales may include a consideration of the natural role of fire in good condition Wyoming big sagebrush ecosystems. This study shows that under these conditions, fire can promote good condition mid-successional ecosystems and can act as a fuel break, slowing the spread and decreasing the intensity of a future wildfire.


Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis FCCS Fire behavior Hart Mountain Long-term fire effects Prescribed burning Sagebrush steppe 



This work was supported by the Joint Fire Science Program (Project #14-1-02-5) and the Greater Sheldon-Hart Conservation Fund. We thank the staff at HMNAR and field technicians and lab assistants: Heather Wrobleski, C. Norman Swanson, Michelle McDowell, Emily Platt, and Bobby Burdick. We are grateful for the fire modeling advice provided by Susan Pritchard. This project was conducted under Special Use Permit issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; however, the methodology, analyses, and conclusions expressed represent the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views, positions, or policies of the Sheldon-Hart Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

Supplementary material

10021_2018_268_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)


  1. Baker WL. 2006. Fire and restoration of sagebrush ecosystems. Wildl Soc Bull 34:177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker WL. 2011. Pre-Euro-American and recent fire in sagebrush ecosystems. In: Knick S, Connelly JW, Eds. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in avian biology. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp 185–201.Google Scholar
  3. Baker WL. 2013. Is wildland fire increasing in sagebrush landscapes of the Western United States? Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103:5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyte SP, Wylie BK. 2015. Near-real-time cheatgrass percent cover in the Northern Great Basin, USA, 2015. Rangelands 38(5):278–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley BA, Mustard JF. 2006. Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing. Ecol Appl 16:1132–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54:677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. General technical report INT-16. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. p 24.Google Scholar
  8. Canfield R. 1941. Application of line intercept method in sampling range vegetation. J For 39:388–94.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers JC, Bradley BA, Brown CS, D’Antonio C, Germino MJ, Grace JB, Hardegree SP, Miller RF, Pyke DA. 2014. Resilience to stress and disturbance, and resistance to Bromus tectorum L. invasion in cold desert shrublands of Western North America. Ecosystems 17:360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Champlin MR. 1982. Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) ecology and management with emphasis on prescribed burning. PhD dissertation, Oregon State University. p 136.Google Scholar
  11. Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE. 2015. Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Sci Adv 1:e1400082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford JA, Olson RA, West NE, Mosley JC, Schroeder MA, Whitson TD, Miller RF, Gregg MA, Boyd CS. 2004. Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat. Rangel Ecol Manag 57:2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creutzburg MK, Halofsky JE, Halofsky JS, Christopher TA. 2015. Climate change and land management in the rangelands of Central Oregon. Environ Manag 55:43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies KW, Svejcar TJ. 2008. Comparison of medusahead-invaded and noninvaded Wyoming big sagebrush steppe in southeastern Oregon. Rangel Ecol Manag 61:623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellsworth LM, Wrobleski DW, Kauffman JB, Reis SA. 2016. Ecosystem resilience is evident 17 years after fire in Wyoming big sagebrush ecosystems. Ecosphere 7:e01618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahalovich MF, McAurthur ED. 2004. Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) seed and plant transfer guidelines. Nativ Plants (Fall) 5:141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mata-González R, Hunter RG, Coldren CL, McLendon T, Paschke MW. 2007. Modelling plant growth dynamics in sagebrush steppe communities affected by fire. J Arid Environ 69:144–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
  20. Miller RF, Chambers JC, Pyke DA, Pierson FB, Williams CJ. 2013. A review of fire effects on vegetation and soils in the Great Basin Region: response and ecological site characteristics. Last Accessed 14/05/2016.
  21. Miller RF, Eddleman L. 2001. Spatial and temporal changes of sage grouse habitat in the sagebrush biome. Corvallis: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  22. Miller RF, Knick ST, Pyke DA, Meinke CW, Hanser SE, Wisdom MJ, Hild AL. 2011. Pre-Euro-American and recent fire in sagebrush ecosystems. In: Knick S, Connelly JW, Eds. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in avian biology. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp 145–85.Google Scholar
  23. Miller RF, Heyerdahl EK. 2008. Fine-scale variation of historical fire regimes in sagebrush-steppe and juniper woodland: an example from California, USA. Int J Wildl Fire 17:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller RF, Rose JA. 1999. Fire history and western juniper encroachment in sagebrush steppe. J Range Manag 52:550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris LR, Leger EA. 2016. Secondary succession in the sagebrush semidesert 66 years after fire in the Great Basin, USA. Nat Areas J 36:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy T, Naugle DE, Eardley R, Maestas JD, Griffiths T, Pellant M, Stiver SJ. 2013. Trial by fire. Rangelands 35:2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reed-Dustin CM. 2015. Long-term fire effects on plant succession and exotic weeds in protected area sagebrush steppe. Oregon: John Day Fossil Beds National Monument.Google Scholar
  28. Rein G, Cleaver N, Ashton C, Pironi P, Torero J. 2008. The severity of smoldering peat fires and damage to the forest soil. Catena 74:304–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shultz LM. 2009. Monograph of Artemisia subgenus Tridentatae (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). Syst Bot Monogr 89:1–131.Google Scholar
  30. Tisdale EW. 1994. Great Basin region: sagebrush types. In: Shiflet TN, Ed. Rangeland cover types. Society of Range Management Denver, Colorado, USA. pp 40–6.Google Scholar
  31. USFWS. 1994. Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge comprehensive management plan. USA: Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  32. Wambolt CL, Walhof KS, Frisina MR. 2001. Recovery of big sagebrush communities after burning in south-western Montana. J Environ Manag 61:243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manag 42:266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whisenant SG. 1990. Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: Ecological and management implications. In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith S D, Tueller PT, Eds. Proceedings–Symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management. General Technical Report INT-276, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. pp 4–10.Google Scholar
  35. Wright HA, Bailey AW. 1982. Fire Ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Wrobleski DW. 1999. Effects of prescribed fire on Wyoming big sagebrush communities: Implications for ecological restoration of sage grouse habitat. In: M.S. Thesis, Oregon: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  37. Wrobleski DW, Kauffman JB. 2003. Initial effects of prescribed fire on morphology, abundance, and phenology of forbs in big sagebrush communities in southeastern Oregon. Restor Ecol 11:82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ziegenhagen LL, Miller RF. 2009. Postfire recovery of two shrubs in the interiors of large burns in the Intermountain West, USA. West North Am Nat 69:195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Schyler A. Reis
    • 1
  • Lisa M. Ellsworth
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Boone Kauffman
    • 1
  • David W. Wrobleski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Plains Thompson Falls and Superior Ranger DistrictsUSDA Forest ServicePlainsUSA

Personalised recommendations