Ecosystems

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Responses of Tree Transpiration and Growth to Seasonal Rainfall Redistribution in a Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

  • Yanting Hu
  • Ping Zhao
  • Weijun Shen
  • Liwei Zhu
  • Guangyan Ni
  • Xiuhua Zhao
  • Zhenzhen Zhang
  • Xingquan Rao
  • Lei Ouyang
  • Xiaomin Zeng
  • Dan Sun
  • Yongbiao Lin
Article

Abstract

Precipitation changes such as more frequent drought and altered precipitation seasonality may impose substantial impacts on the structure and functioning of forest ecosystems. A better understanding of tree responses to precipitation changes can provide fundamental information for the conservation and management of forests under future climate regimes. We conducted a 2-year seasonal rainfall redistribution experiment to assess the responses of tree transpiration and growth to manipulated precipitation changes in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Three precipitation treatments were administered including a drier dry season and wetter wet season treatment (DD), an extended dry season and wetter wet season treatment (ED), and an ambient control treatment, with the total amount of annual rainfall being kept the same among the three treatments. Our results showed that the DD and ED treatments reduced daily transpiration of Schima superba by 8–16 and 13–25%, respectively. The ED treatment also reduced the DBH increment of larger S. superba individuals. In contrast, neither treatment showed obvious effects on the transpiration and DBH increment of another dominant species Michelia macclurei. However, the transpiration of both species showed clear inter-annual differences between the 2 years with contrasting annual rainfall (2094 vs 1582 mm). S. superba had a lower transpiration-to-precipitation ratio (T/P) compared to M. macclurei and showed decreased sensitivities to total solar radiation and vapor pressure deficit under the DD and ED treatments. These results indicate the deep-rooted S. superba may be suppressed with a lower ability to obtain water and assimilate carbon compared to the shallow-rooted M. macclurei under the precipitation seasonality changes, which could potentially cause shifts in species dominance within the forest community.

Keywords

environmental factors evergreen broad-leaved forest rainfall redistribution sap flow sensitivity of transpiration transpiration response tree growth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41630752, 31130011, 41030638, 31290222) and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams. Sincere thanks to the staff in Heshan National Field Research Station of Forest Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences. We particularly thank Dr. Jianguo Gao who managed the sap flow measurement and Mr. Zhipeng Chen who helped with instruments maintenance. Two anonymous reviewers and the subject-matter editor provided constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10021_2017_185_MOESM1_ESM.docx (427 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 427 kb)

References

  1. Belk EL, Markewitz D, Rasmussen TC, Carvalho EJM, Nepstad DC, Davidson EA. 2007. Modeling the effects of throughfall reduction on soil water content in a Brazilian Oxisol under a moist tropical forest. Water Resour Res 43:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beier C, Beierkuhnlein C, Wohlgemuth T, Penuelas J, Emmett B, Körner C, de Boeck H, Christensen JH, Leuzinger S, Janssens IA, Hansen K. 2012. Precipitation manipulation experiments-challenges and recommendations for the future. Ecol Lett 15:899–911.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovard BD, Curtis PS, Vogel CS, Su HB, Schmid HP. 2005. Environmental controls on sap flow in a northern hardwood forest. Tree Physiol 25:31–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brando P, Ray D, Nepstad D, Cardinot G, Curran LM, Oliveira R. 2006. Effects of partial throughfall exclusion on the phenology of Coussarea racemosa (Rubiaceae) in an east-central Amazon rainforest. Oecologia 150:181–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brando PM, Nepstad DC, Davidson EA, Trumbore SE, Ray D, Camargo P. 2008. Drought effects on litterfall, wood production and belowground carbon cycling in an Amazon forest: results of a throughfall reduction experiment. Philos T R SOC B 363:1839–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW. 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush SE, Hultine KR, Sperry JS, Ehleringer JR, Philips N. 2010. Calibration of thermal dissipation sap flow probes for ring and diffuse porous trees. Tree Physiol 30:1545–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell GS, Norman JM. 1998. An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Churkina G, Running SW, Schloss AL, Intercomparison T, Model POFTPN. 1999. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): the importance of water availability. Global Change Biol 5:46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, Noblet ND, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cinnirella S, Magnani F, Saracino A, Borghetti M. 2002. Response of a mature Pinus laricio plantation to a three-year restriction of water supply: structural and functional acclimation to drought. Tree Physiol 22:21–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer MD, Hoffmann V, Verboom GA. 2008. Nutrient availability moderates transpiration in Ehrharta calycina. New Phytol 179:1048–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cramer MD, Hawkins HJ, Verboom GA. 2009. The importance of nutritional regulation of plant water flux. Oecologia 161:15–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cregger MA, McDowell NG, Pangle RE, Pockman WT, Classen AT. 2014. The impact of precipitation change on nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid ecosystem. Funct Ecol 28:1534–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. da Costa ACL, Galbraith D, Almeida S, Portela BTT, da Costa M, de Athaydes Silva Junior J, Braga AP, de Gonçalves PHL, de Oliveira AA, Fisher R, Phillips OL, Metcalfe DB, Levy P, Meir P. 2010. Effect of 7 yr of experimental drought on vegetation dynamics and biomass storage of an eastern Amazonian rainforest. New Phytol 187:579–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson EA, Nepstad DC, Ishida FY, Brando PM. 2008. Effects of an experimental drought and recovery on soil emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and nitric oxide in a moist tropical forest. Global Change Biol 14:2582–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fekedulegn D, Hicks RR, Colbert JJ. 2003. Influence of topographic aspect, precipitation and drought on radial growth of four major tree species in an Appalachian watershed. Forest Ecol Manag 177:409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher RA, Williams M, da Costa AL, Malhi Y, da Costa RF, Almeida S, Meir P. 2007. The response of an Eastern Amazonian rain forest to drought stress, results and modelling analyses from a throughfall exclusion experiment. Global Change Biol 13:2361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fu SL, Lin YB, Rao XQ, Liu SP. 2011. The dataset of observation and research on chinese ecosystem: forest ecosystem of Heshan Station, Guangdong Province (1998–2008). Beijing: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gao J, Zhao P, Shen W, Niu J, Zhu L, Ni G. 2015. Biophysical limits to responses of water flux to vapor pressure deficit in seven tree species with contrasting land use regimes. Agr Forest Meteorol 200:258–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garbulsky MF, Peñuelas J, Papale D, Ardö J, Goulden ML, Kiely G, Richardson AD, Rotenberg E, Veenendaal EM, Filella L. 2010. Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granier A. 1987. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree physiol 3:309–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanson PJ. 2000. Large-scale water manipulations. In: Running SW, Thornton PE, Nemani R, Glassy J, Eds. Methods in ecosystem science. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  24. Hao YR, Peng SL. 2009. Root of different dominant tree species in zonal vegetation in southern subtropical China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 31:25–30 (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  25. Hartmann H. 2011. Will a 385 million year-struggle for light become a struggle for water and for carbon?—How trees may cope with more frequent climate change-type drought events. Global Change Biol 17:642–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hultine KR, Nagler PL, Morino K, Bush SE, Burtch KG, Dennison PE, Glenn EP, Ehleringer JR. 2010. Sap flux-scaled transpiration by tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) before, during and after episodic defoliation by the saltcedar leaf beetle (Diorhabda carinulata). Agric For Meteorol 150:1467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huxman TE, Snyder KA, Tissue D, Leffler AJ, Ogle K, Pockman WT, Sandquist DR, Potts DL, Schwinning S. 2004. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:254–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Irvine J, Perks MP, Magnani F, Grace J. 1998. The response of Pinus sylvestris to drought, stomatal control of transpiration and hydraulic conductance. Tree physiol 18:393–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jalali M. 2005. Nitrates leaching from agricultural land in Hamadan, western Iran. Agr Ecosyst Environ 110:210–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson DM, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC. 2012. Hydraulic safety margins and embolism reversal in stems and leaves: why are conifers and angiosperms so different? Plant Science 195:48–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones HG. 2013. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kent M. 2011. Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Koelliker JK. 2001. Frequency and extent of water limitation to primary production in a mesic temperate grassland. Ecosystems 4:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knapp AK, Smith MD. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Köcher P, Horna V, Leuschner C. 2013. Stem water storage in five coexisting temperate broad-leaved tree species: significance, temporal dynamics and dependence on tree functional traits. Tree Physiol 33:817–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunert N, Cárdenas AM. 2015. Are mixed tropical tree plantations more resistant to drought than monocultures? Forests 6:2029–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li XD. 1984. Preliminary research on nutrient element distribution and biomass characteristics of Michelia macclurei plantations under different site conditions. Journal of Guangxi Agricultural and Biological Science 2:88–100 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  38. Li Z. 2008. Impacts of upper tropospheric cooling upon the late spring drought in East Asia simulated by a regional climate model. Adv Atmos Sci 25:555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Limousin JM, Rambal S, Ourcival JM, Rocheteau A, Joffre R, Rodríguez-Cortina R. 2009. Long-term transpiration change with rainfall decline in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest. Global Change Biol 15:2163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu L, Wang X, Lajeunesse MJ, Miao G, Piao S, Wan S, Wu Y, Wang Z, Yang S, Li P, Deng M. 2016. A cross-biome synthesis of soil respiration and its determinants under simulated precipitation changes. Glob Change Biol 22:1394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loik ME, Breshears DD, Lauenroth WK, Belnap J. 2004. A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA. Oecologia 141:269–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Loreau M, Hector A. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. MacKay SL, Arain MA, Khomik M, Brodeur JJ, Schumacher J, Hartmann H, Peichl M. 2012. The impact of induced drought on transpiration and growth in a temperate pine plantation forest. Hydrol Process 26:1779–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meinzer FC, Johnson DM, Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR. 2009. Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance. Funct Ecol 23:922–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDowell NG, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought, why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New phytol 178:719–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McDowell NG. 2011. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol 155:1051–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller PC. 2012. Resource use by chaparral and matorral, a comparison of vegetation function in two Mediterranean type ecosystems. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  48. Min CC. 2012. Study on the Evapotranspiration of NSTEC based on RS and GIS (Master’s thesis, Hubei University).Google Scholar
  49. Misson L, Degueldre D, Collin C, Rodriguez R, Rocheteau A, Ourcival J, Rambal S. 2011. Phenological responses to extreme droughts in a Mediterranean forest. Global Change Biol 17:1036–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF. 1991. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ 14:509–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Muraoka H, Tang Y, Terashima I, Koizumi H, Washitani I. 2000. Contributions of diffusional limitation, photoinhibition and photorespiration to midday depression of photosynthesis in Arisaema heterophyllum in natural high light. Plant Cell Environ 23:235–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nepstad DC, Moutinho P, Dias-Filho MB, Davidson E, Cardinot G, Markewitz D, Figueiredo R, Vianna N, Chambers J, Ray D, Guerreiros JB, Lefebvre P, Sternberg L, Moreira M, Barros L, Ishida FY, Tohlver I, Belk E, Kalif K, Schwalbe K. 2002. The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest. J Geophys Res 107.Google Scholar
  53. Ogaya R, Peñuelas J. 2007. Tree growth, mortality, and above-ground biomass accumulation in a holm oak forest under a five-year experimental field drought. Plant Ecol 189:291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oren R, Pataki DE. 2001. Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia 127:549–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Oren R, Zimmermann R, Terbough J. 1996. Transpiration in upper Amazonia floodplain and upland forests in response to drought-breaking rains. Ecology 77:968–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pangle RE, Limousin JM, Plaut JA, Yepez EA, Hudson PJ, Boutz AL, Gehres N, Pockman WT, McDowell NG. 2015. Prolonged experimental drought reduces plant hydraulic conductance and transpiration and increases mortality in a piñon-juniper woodland. Ecol Evol 5:1618–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Pataki DE, McCarthy HR, Litvak E, Pincetl S. 2011. Transpiration of urban forests in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Ecol Appl 21:661–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pataki DE, Oren R. 2003. Species differences in stomatal control of water loss at the canopy scale in a mature bottomland deciduous forest. Adv Water Resour 26:1267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paw UKT, Falk M, Suchanek TH, Ustin SL, Chen J, Park Y-S, Winner WE, Thomas SC, Hsiao TC, Shaw RH. 2004. Carbon dioxide exchange between an old-growth forest and the atmosphere. Ecosystems 7:513–24.Google Scholar
  60. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Zhang X, Llorens L, Ogaya R, Lloret F, Comas P, Estiarte M, Terradas J. 2004. Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytol 161:837–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Plaut JA, Wadsworth WD, Pangle R, Yepez EA, McDowell NG, Pockman WT. 2013. Reduced transpiration response to precipitation pulses precedes mortality in a pinon-juniper woodland subject to prolonged drought. New Phytol 200:375–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Davis SD. 2007. Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. New Phytol 174:787–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Reich PB, Oleksyn J. 2004. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. PNAS 101:11001–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Richards AE, Wright IJ, Lenz TI, Zanne AE. 2014. Sapwood capacitance is greater in evergreen sclerophyll species growing in high compared to low-rainfall environments. Funct Ecol 28:734–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruehr NK, Law BE, Quandt D, Williams M. 2014. Effects of heat and drought on carbon and water dynamics in a regenerating semi-arid pine forest, a combined experimental and modeling approach. Biogeosciences 11:4139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G. 2010. Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol 186:274–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sala A, Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC. 2012. Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? Tree Physiol 32:764–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Miralles-Wilhelm F. 2007. Biophysical properties and functional significance of stem water storage tissues in Neotropical savanna trees. Plant Cell Environ 30:236–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Scholz FG, Phillips NG, Bucci SJ, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G. 2011. Hydraulic capacitance: biophysics and functional significance of internal water sources in relation to tree size. In: Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Dawson TE, Eds. Size-and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Scurlock JMO, Johnson K, Olson RJ. 2002. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biol 8:736–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sevanto S, McDowell NG, Dickman LT, Pangle R, Pockman WT. 2013. How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Plant Cell Environ 37:153–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Shen W, Jenerette GD, Hui D, Phillips RP, Ren H. 2008. Effects of changing precipitation regimes on dryland soil respiration and C pool dynamics at rainfall event, seasonal and interannual scales. J Geophys Res 113.Google Scholar
  73. Shen W, Reynolds JF, Hui D. 2009. Responses of dryland soil respiration and soil carbon pool size to abrupt vs. gradual and individual vs. combined changes in soil temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric [CO2], a simulation analysis. Global Change Biol 15:2274–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shen W, Jenerette GD, Hui D, Scott RL. 2016. Precipitation legacy effects on dryland ecosystem carbon fluxes: direction, magnitude and biogeochemical carryovers. Biogeosciences 13:425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL. 2009. A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90:3279–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sotta ED, Veldkamp E, Schwendenmann L, Guimaraes BR, Paixão RK, Ruivo MDLP, da Costa ACL, Meir P. 2007. Effects of an induced drought on soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux and soil CO2 production in an Eastern Amazonian rainforest, Brazil. Global Change Biol 13:2218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stocker T. 2014. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Unsworth MH, Phillips N, Link T, Bond BJ, Falk M, Harmon ME, Hinckley TM, Marks D. 2004. Components and controls of water flux in an old-growth Douglas-fir–western hemlock ecosystem. Ecosystems 7:468–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vicca S, Bahn M, Estiarte M, van Loon EE, Vargas R et al. 2014. Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments. Biogeosciences 11:2991–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walter H. 1973. Vegetation of the earth in relation to climate and the eco-physiological conditions. English Universities Press.Google Scholar
  81. Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin G, Pockman WT, Shaw RM, Small EE, Smith MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC. 2003. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 53:941–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wu Z, Dijkstra P, Koch GW, Penuelas J, Hungate BA. 2011. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Global Change Biol 17:927–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wullschleger SD, Hanson PJ. 2006. Sensitivity of canopy transpiration to altered precipitation in an upland oak forest, Evidence from a long-term field manipulation study. Global Change Biol 12:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xin X, Yu R, Zhou T, Wang B. 2006. Drought in late spring of South China in recent decades. J Climate 19:3197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang B. 2010. Study on underground biomass in evergreen subtropical broad-leaved forest of Gutian Mountain (Master’s thesis, Zhejiang Normal University).Google Scholar
  86. Zeppel MJB, Wilks JV, Lewis JD. 2014. Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants. Biogeosciences 11:3083–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhao Q, Jian S, Nunan N, Maestre FT, Tedersoo L, He J, Wei H, Tan X, Shen W. 2017. Altered precipitation seasonality impacts the dominant fungal but rare bacterial taxa in subtropical forest soils. Biol Fert Soils 53:231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhou G, Wei X, Wu Y, Liu S, Huang Y, Yan J, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Liu J, Meng Z, Wang C, Chu G, Liu S, Tang X, Liu X. 2011. Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China. Global Change Biol 17:3736–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhu LW, Zhao P, Cai XA, Zeng XP, Ni GY, Zhang JY, Zou LL, Mei TT, Yu MH. 2012. Effects of sap velocity on the daytime increase of stem CO2 efflux from stems of Schima superba trees. Trees 26:535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanting Hu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ping Zhao
    • 1
    • 3
  • Weijun Shen
    • 1
  • Liwei Zhu
    • 1
  • Guangyan Ni
    • 1
  • Xiuhua Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhenzhen Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xingquan Rao
    • 1
  • Lei Ouyang
    • 1
  • Xiaomin Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan Sun
    • 1
  • Yongbiao Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations