, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 248–262 | Cite as

A Multidimensional Functional Trait Approach Reveals the Imprint of Environmental Stress in Mediterranean Woody Communities

  • Enrique G. de la RivaEmail author
  • Cyrille Violle
  • Ignacio M. Pérez-Ramos
  • Teodoro Marañón
  • Carmen M. Navarro-Fernández
  • Manuel Olmo
  • Rafael Villar


Water availability is one of the most important factors determining species distribution, plant community structure and ecosystem functioning. We explore how the functional structure of Mediterranean woody plant communities varies along a regional gradient of aridity in the Andalusian region (south Spain). We question whether communities located in more arid sites show more similarity in their functional structure when compared with communities located in wetter sites or whether, instead, there is divergence in their functional spaces. We selected five aridity zones (three sampling sites per zone) and measured 13 traits of different functional dimensions (including leaf, stem and root traits) in 74 woody plant species. We quantified functional space differences using the n-dimensional niche space approach (hypervolume). We found a larger functional space for the wetter communities compared with the more arid communities, which showed greater overlap of the trait space occupation. Our results indicate that aridity acts as a key abiotic filter affecting various metrics of the community trait structure, in accordance with the plant economics spectrum. We have also documented consistent variation in the functional space, supporting lower functional diversity under more harsh climatic conditions. The trend of functional space variation along the aridity gradient was different when considering traits from only one plant organ. Thus, the filtering process driving the functional structure of the communities studied here largely depends on the trait axis considered; for example, the root dimension showed considerable variation in wet environments, whereas the leaf dimension exhibited a larger functional space in the drier habitats.


aridity dry shrubland functional diversity functional structure hypervolume plant traits 



This study was funded by the Spanish MEC Projects DIVERBOS (CGL2011-30285-C02-01 and C02-02), ECO-MEDIT (CGL2014-53236-R), RESTECO (CGL2014-52858-R) and DECAFUN (CGL2015-70123-R), the Andalusian ANASINQUE project (PGC2010-RNM-5782), the Life + Biodehesa Project (11/BIO/ES/000726), and the European FEDER funds. CV was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant Project ‘Ecophysiological and biophysical constraints on domestication in crop plants’ (Grant ERC-StG-2014-639706-CONSTRAINTS). Thanks are due to Emilio Retamosa and Vicky Schwarzer from the Cabo de Gata Natural Park, for field assistance and plant classification. Isotopic analysis was carried out in the LIE (EBD-CSIC) and analysis of leaf N in the SCAI of the University of Córdoba. Dr. David Walker revised the English.

Supplementary material

10021_2017_147_MOESM1_ESM.docx (362 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 361 kb)


  1. Ackerly DD, Cornwell WK. 2007. A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within-and among-community components. Ecol Lett 10:135–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnell NW. 1999. Climate change and global water resources. Glob Environ Change 9:S31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard-Verdier M, Navas ML, Vellend M, Violle C, Fayolle A, Garnier E. 2012. Community assembly along a soil depth gradient: contrasting patterns of plant trait convergence and divergence in a Mediterranean rangeland. J Ecol 100:1422–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas SR, Mallik AU. 2010. Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology 91:28–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blonder B, Lamanna C, Violle C, Enquist BJ. 2014. The n-dimensional hypervolume. Global Ecol Biogeogr 23:595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E. 2006. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long–term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canfield RH. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J For 39:388–94.Google Scholar
  8. Carmona CP, de Bello F, Mason NW, Lepš J. 2016. Traits without borders: integrating functional diversity across scales. Trends Ecol Evol 31:382–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cingolani AM, Cabido M, Gurvich DE, Renison D, Díaz S. 2007. Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: Are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? J Veg Sci 18:911–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD. 2009. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr 79:109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD. 2006. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87:1465–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Craine JM, Wedin DA, Chapin FS, Reich PB. 2003. Relationship between the structure of root systems and resource use for 11 North American grassland plants. Plant Ecol 165:85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Bello F, Lepš J, Lavorel S, Moretti M. 2007. Importance of species abundance for assessment of trait composition: an example based on pollinator communities. Community Ecol 8:163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Lavergne S, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, Mazel F, Thuiller W. 2013. Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps. Ecography 36:393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de la Riva EG, Pérez-Ramos IM, Tosto A, Navarro-Fernández CM, Olmo M, Marañón T, Villar R. 2016a. Disentangling the relative importance of species occurrence, abundance and intraspecific variability in community assembly: a trait-based approach at the whole-plant level in Mediterranean forests. Oikos 125:354–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de la Riva EG, Tosto A, Pérez-Ramos IM, Navarro-Fernández CM, Olmo M, Anten NP, Marañón T, Villar R. 2016b. A plant economics spectrum in Mediterranean forests along environmental gradients: Is there coordination among leaf, stem and root traits? J Veg Sci 27:187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JH, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, Dray S et al. 2016. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529:167–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, Hubbell SP. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447:80–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Freschet GT, Cornelissen JH, Van Logtestijn RS, Aerts R. 2010. Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora. J Ecol 98:362–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Funk JL, Cornwell WK. 2013. Leaf traits within communities: context may affect the mapping of traits to function. Ecology 94:1893–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gálmes J, Cifre J, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2005. Modulation of relative growth rate and its components by water stress in Mediterranean species with different growth forms. Oecologia 145:21–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Garnier E, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, Castro H, Cruz P, Dolezal J, Eriksson O, Fortunel C et al. 2007. A standardized methodology to assess the effects of land use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands. Ann Bot 99:967–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Garnier E, Navas ML. 2012. A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grime JP. 2006. Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: mechanisms and consequences. J Veg Sci 17:255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gross N, Börger L, Soriano-Morales SI et al. 2013. Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands. J Ecol 101:637–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grubb PJ, Marañón T, Pugnaire FI, Sack L. 2015. Relationships between specific leaf area and leaf composition in succulent and non-succulent species of contrasting semi-desert communities in south-eastern Spain. J Arid Environ 118:69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heberling JM, Fridley JD. 2012. Biogeographic constraints on the world-wide leaf economics spectrum. Global Ecol Biogeogr 21:1137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heywood VH, Ed. 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hutchinson GE. 1957. Cold spring harbour symposium on quantitative biology. Concluding Remarks 22:415–27.Google Scholar
  30. IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical scientific basis.WMO, UNEP.Google Scholar
  31. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: nonconvergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities. New Phytol 180:100–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleidon A, Mooney HA. 2000. A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modelling study. Global Change Biol 6:507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein CH. 2007. Lecture notes for the teaching module forest inventory. Institute of Forest Management, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology. Georg August Universitat, DE.Google Scholar
  34. Kramer-Walter KR, Bellingham PJ, Millar TR, Smissen RD, Richardson SJ, Laughlin DC. 2016. Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum. J Ecol 104:1299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laliberté E. 2017. Below-ground frontiers in trait-based plant ecology. New Phytol 213:1597–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Laliberté E, Shipley B. 2011. Measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. 1.0–11.Google Scholar
  37. Lamanna C, Blonder B, Violle C et al. 2014. Functional trait space and the latitudinal diversity gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13745–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Laughlin DC. 2014. The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly. J Ecol 102:186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laughlin DC, Leppert JJ, Moore MM, Sieg CH. 2010. A multi-trait test of the leaf–height–seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora. Funct Ecol 24:493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loranger J, Blonder B, Garnier E, Shipley B, Vile D, Violle C. 2016a. Occupancy and overlap in trait space along a successional gradient in Mediterranean old fields. Am J Bot 103:1050–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Loranger J, Violle C, Shipley B, Lavorel S, Bonis A, Cruz P, Louault F, Loucougaray G, Mesléard F, Yavercovski N, Garnier E. 2016b. Recasting the dynamic equilibrium model through a functional lens: the interplay of trait-based community assembly and climate. J Ecol 104:781–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacArthur R, Levins R. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maire V, Gross N, Börger L et al. 2012. Habitat filtering and niche differentiation jointly explain species relative abundance within grassland communities along fertility and disturbance gradients. New Phytol 196:497–509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mason NW, de Bello F, Doležal J, Lepš J. 2011. Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol 99:788–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mason NW, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB. 2005. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayfield MM, Levine JM. 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol Lett 13:1085–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mokany K, Roxburgh SH. 2010. The importance of spatial scale for trait–abundance relations. Oikos 119:1504–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mouillot D, Villéger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Mason NW. 2011. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PloS ONE 6:e17476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Navarro-Fernández CM, Pérez-Ramos IM, de la Riva EG, Vera JR, Roumet C, Villar R, Marañón T. 2016. Functional responses of Mediterranean plant communities to soil resource heterogeneity: a mycorrhizal trait-based approach. J Veg Sci 27:1243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Oksanen MJ. 2013. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version, 2(9).Google Scholar
  51. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI. 2007. Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Funct Ecol 21:489–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pakeman RJ. 2011. Functional diversity indices reveal the impacts of land use intensification on plant community assembly. J Ecol 99:1143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E et al. 2013. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pérez-Ramos IM, Roumet C, Cruz P et al. 2012. Evidence for a “plant community economics spectrum” driven by nutrient and water limitations in a Mediterranean rangeland of southern France. J Ecol 100:1315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. 2015. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-121,
  56. Poorter L, Markesteijn L. 2008. Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica 40:321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. 1992. Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB. 2003. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164:S143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reu B, Proulx R, Bohn K, Dyke JG, Kleidon A, Pavlick R, Schmidtlein S. 2011. The role of climate and plant functional trade-offs in shaping global biome and biodiversity patterns. Global Ecol Biogeogr 20:570–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schimel DS, Braswell R, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Parton WJ, Pulliam W. 1996. Climate and nitrogen controls on the geography and timescales of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:677–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stubbs WJ, Bastow Wilson J. 2004. Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. J Ecol 92:557–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Sykes MT, Araújo MB. 2006. Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers Distrib 12:49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trabucco A, Zomer RJ. 2009. Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. Published online, available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal at
  64. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. 2008. New multi-dimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Villéger S, Ramos Miranda J, Flores Hernández D, Mouillot D. 2010. Contrasting changes in taxonomic vs. functional diversity of tropical fish communities after habitat degradation. Ecol Appl 20:1512–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Violle C, Jiang L. 2009. Towards a trait-based quantification of species niche. J Plant Ecol 2:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Violle C, Reich PB, Pacala SW, Enquist BJ, Kattge J. 2014. The emergence and promise of functional biogeography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13690–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wright JP, Sutton-Grier A. 2012. Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within local species pools across varying environmental conditions? Funct Ecol 26:1390–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique G. de la Riva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cyrille Violle
    • 2
  • Ignacio M. Pérez-Ramos
    • 3
  • Teodoro Marañón
    • 3
  • Carmen M. Navarro-Fernández
    • 3
  • Manuel Olmo
    • 1
  • Rafael Villar
    • 1
  1. 1.Área de Ecología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.CEFE UMR 5175CNRS – Université de Montpellier – Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier – EPHEMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, IRNAS, CSICSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations