Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multifaceted Analysis of Patch-Level Plant Diversity in Response to Landscape Spatial Pattern and History on Mediterranean Dunes

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape structure is known to critically affect biodiversity. However, although the multi-facetted character of biodiversity is widely recognized, few studies have linked landscape spatial pattern and history simultaneously to multiple facets (taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic) and spatial components (α, β, and γ) of plant diversity. We set out to reveal whether landscape parameters have specific effects on the separate diversity facets and components of plant diversity at a patch scale on coastal dune landscapes of Central Italy. For each landscape patch, we computed a set of patch-based metrics relying on multi-temporal land-cover maps. Based on a database of plant community plots, on functional traits from field measurements and on a dated phylogenetic tree, we calculated taxonomic (TD), functional (FD), and phylogenetic diversity (PD) within each patch at α, β, and γ level. Diversity measures were then related to the landscape metrics via linear mixed-effect models. Landscape pattern and transformations affected TD only moderately in coastal dune ecosystems. We found much stronger and contrasted effects on FD and PD. FD increased in patches surrounded by human-dominated habitats; PD was higher in fragmented patches, particularly in the Mediterranean macchia. Moreover, landscape pattern affected differently the single communities, the turnover among communities and the pool of species within the patch (α, β, and γ components). Our results call for the combined inclusion of FD and PD and their partitions into ecological analyses, being TD too crude to capture the comprehensive and contrasted response of plant diversity to landscape spatial pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie JC, Machon N, Muratet A, Porcher E. 2010. Landscape disturbance causes small-scale functional homogenization, but limited taxonomic homogenization, in plant communities. J Ecol 99:1134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta ATR, Blasi V, Stanisci A. 2000. Spatial connectivity and boundary patterns in coastal dune vegetation in the Circeo National Park, Central Italy. J Veg Sci 11:149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta ATR, Carranza ML, Izzi CF. 2005. Combining land cover mapping of coastal dunes with vegetation analysis. Appl Veg Sci 8:133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta ATR, Carranza ML, Izzi CF. 2009. Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes? Biodivers Conserv 18:1087–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alodos CL, Pueyo Y, Barrantes O, Escós J, Giner L, Robles AB. 2004. Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 19:543–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amici V, Rocchini D, Filibeck G, Bacaro G, Santi E, Geri F, Landi S, Scoppola A, Chiarucci A. 2015. Landscape structure effects on forest plant diversity at local scale: exploring the role of spatial extent. Ecol Complex 21:44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnou C, Iguzquiza J, Pino J. 2015. Examining the role of landscape structure and dynamics in alien plant invasion from urban Mediterranean coastal habitats. Landsc Urban Plan 136:156–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti C, Luiselli L, Frank B, Lorenzetti E. 2009. Should fragment area reduction be considered a stress for forest bird assemblages? Evidence from diversity/dominance diagrams. Community Ecol 10:189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard-Verdier M, Flores O, Navas ML, Garnier E. 2013. Partitioning phylogenetic and functional diversity into α and β components along an environmental gradient in a Mediterranean rangeland. J Veg Sci 24:877–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, Oakley TH. 2009. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One 4:e5695.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Calvão T, Pessoa MF, Lidon FC. 2013. Impact of human activities on coastal vegetation: a review. Emir J Food Agric 25:926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carboni M, Acosta ATR, Ricotta C. 2013. Are differences in functional diversity among plant communities on Mediterranean coastal dunes driven by their phylogenetic history? J Veg Sci 24:932–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carboni M, Santoro R, Acosta ATR. 2011. Dealing with scarce data to understand how environmental gradients and propagule pressure shape fine-scale alien distribution patterns on coastal dunes. J Veg Sci 22:751–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carboni M, Carranza ML, Acosta ATR. 2009. Assessing conservation status on coastal dunes: a multiscale approach. Landsc Urban Plan 91:17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC, Fortelius M, Borges PAV, Podani J, Schmera D. 2014. Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components. J Biogeogr 41:749–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza ML, Acosta ATR, Stanisci A, Pirone G, Ciaschetti G. 2008. Ecosystem classification for EU habitat distribution assessment in sandy coastal environments: an application in central Italy. Environ Monit Assess 140:99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza ML, Carboni M, Feola S, Acosta ATR. 2010. Landscape-scale patterns of alien plant species on coastal dunes: the case of iceplant in Central Italy. Appl Veg Sci 13:135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza ML, Frate L, Paura B. 2012. Structure, ecology and plant richness patterns in fragmented beech forests. Plant Ecol Divers 5:541–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PV, Kembel SW. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros LM, Fagan ME, Willig MR. 2014. Effects of human-modified landscapes on taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dimensions of bat biodiversity. Divers Distrib 21:523–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, Veech JA. 2006. Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species–area relationships: unifying alpha-, beta- and gamma-diversity with sample size and habitat area. Ecol Lett 9:923–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bello F, Lavergne S, Meynard CN, Lepš J, Thuiller W. 2010. The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. J Veg Sci 21:992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Holt RD. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Clavel J, Jiguet F, Lee A, Couvet D. 2008. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Mouquet N. 2010. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol Lett 13:1030–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, De Bello F, Quétier F, Grigulis K, Robson TM. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:20684–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnage R. 2009. Disturbance alters the phylogenetic composition and structure of plant communities in an old field system. PLoS One 4:e7071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drius M, Malavasi M, Acosta ATR, Ricotta C, Carranza ML. 2013. Boundary-based analysis for the assessment of coastal dune landscape integrity over time. Appl Geogr 45:41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA. 2008. Article 17 Technical Report 2001–2006. Brussels: European Environment Agency. http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu/article17.

  • Egorov E, Prati D, Durka W, Michalski S, Fischer M, Schmitt B, Blaser S, Brändle M. 2014. Does land-use intensification decrease plant phylogenetic diversity in local grasslands? PLoS One 9:e103252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F. 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies TJ, Cowling RM, Faith DP, Balmford A, Manning JC, Procheş Ş, van der Bank M, Reeves G, Hedderson TAJ, Savolainen V. 2007. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445:757–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:202–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D, Thies C, Tscharntke T. 2005. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Mora MR, Gallego-Fernández JB, García-Novo F. 1999. Plant functional types in coastal foredunes in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. J Veg Sci 10:27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Davies RG, Orme CDL, Olson VA, Thomas GH, Ding T-S, Rasmussen PC, Lennon JJ, Bennett PM, Owens IPF, Blackburn TM. 2007. Spatial turnover in the global avifauna. Proc R Soc 274:1567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH, Fine PV. 2008. Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol Lett 11:1265–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hersperger AM, Forman RTT. 2003. Adjacency arrangement effects on plant diversity and composition in woodland patches. Oikos 101:279–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesp PA, Martinez ML. 2007. Disturbance processes and dynamics in coastal dunes. In: Johnson EA, Miyanishi K, Eds. Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the response. Amsterdam: Academic Press. p 215–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jucker T, Carboni M, Acosta ATR. 2013. Going beyond taxonomic diversity: deconstructing biodiversity patterns reveals the true cost of iceplant invasion. Divers Distrib 19:1566–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Kühn I, Schweiger O, Klotz S. 2008a. Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecol Lett 11:1054–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Kühn I, Wittig R, Ozinga WA, Poschlod P, Klotz S. 2008b. Urbanization causes shifts in species’ trait state frequencies. Preslia 80:375–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology 87:3186–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Fischer J. 2007. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol Evol 22:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M. 2000. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi M, Carboni M, Cutini M, Carranza ML, Acosta ATR. 2014a. Landscape fragmentation, land-use legacy and propagule pressure promote plant invasion on coastal dunes: a patch-based approach. Landsc Ecol 29:1541–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi M, Santoro R, Cutini M, Acosta ATR, Carranza ML. 2013. What has happened to coastal dunes in the last half century? A multitemporal coastal landscape analysis in Central Italy. Landsc Urban Plan 119:54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi M, Santoro R, Cutini M, Acosta ATR, Carranza ML. 2014b. The impact of human pressure on landscape patterns and plant species richness in Mediterranean coastal dunes. Plant Biosyst 29:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard CN, Devictor V, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Jiguet F, Mouquet N. 2011. Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Zechmeister HG, Plutzar C, Sauberer N, Wrbka T, Grabherr G. 2002. Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 17:657–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi GJ, McDonald M. 2004. Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Gaona S, González-Espinosa M, Meave JA, Sorani V. 2004. Effect of forest fragmentation on the woody flora of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 13:867–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavoine S, Gasc A, Bonsall MB, Mason NWH. 2013. Correlations between phylogenetic and functional diversity: mathematical artefacts or true ecological and evolutionary processes? J Veg Sci 24:781–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, Maintainer R, Hmisc S. 2013. Package ‘nlme’: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-107. 4.2.

  • Redon M, Bergès L, Cordonnier T, Luque S. 2014. Effects of increasing landscape heterogeneity on local plant species richness. Landsc Ecol 29:773–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss J, Bridle JR, Montoya JM, Woodward G. 2009. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol Evol 24:505–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescia AJ, Schmitz MF, de Agar PM, De Pablo CL, Atauri JA, Pineda FD. 1994. Influence of landscape complexity and land management on woody plant diversity in northern Spain. J Veg Sci 5:505–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Pavoine S, Bacaro G, Acosta ATR. 2012. Functional rarefaction for species abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:519–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Szeidl L. 2009. Diversity partitioning of Rao’s quadratic entropy. Theor Popul Biol 76:299–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro R, Jucker T, Carboni M, Acosta ATR. 2012. Patterns of plant community assembly in invaded and non-invaded communities along a natural environmental gradient. J Veg Sci 23:483–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Mantovani W, Peres CA. 1999. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant guild structure in the montane Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv 91:119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C. 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K. 2006. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87:2697–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG. 1987. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Villeger S, Mouillot D. 2008. Additive partitioning of diversity including species differences: a comment on Hardy & Senterre (2007). J Ecol 96:845–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Grenouillet G, Brosse S. 2013. Decomposing functional β-diversity reveals that low functional β-diversity is driven by low functional turnover in European fish assemblages. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:671–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt Andersen U. 1995. Resistance of Danish coastal vegetation types to human trampling. Biol Conserv 71:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U. 2008. Monitoring of landscape change and functions in Saxony (Eastern Germany): methods and indicators. Ecol Indic 8:807–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U. 2011. Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Rev Landsc Res 5:1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24:2098–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA. 2005. Landscape conservation: a new paradigm for the conservation of biodiversity. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR, Eds. Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 238–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Malavasi.

Additional information

Author Contributions

Authorship: All authors contributed substantially to the work: M. Malavasi and M. Carboni conceived and designed the study; M. Malavasi and L. Conti analyzed the data; A. Acosta and M. Cutini coordinated the research. All authors contributed to the writing, which was led by M. Malavasi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (RTF 19481 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malavasi, M., Conti, L., Carboni, M. et al. Multifaceted Analysis of Patch-Level Plant Diversity in Response to Landscape Spatial Pattern and History on Mediterranean Dunes. Ecosystems 19, 850–864 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9971-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9971-4

Keywords

Navigation