Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 477–491 | Cite as

A Framework for Evaluating Heterogeneity and Landscape-Level Impacts of Non-native Aquatic Species

  • M. Jake Vander ZandenEmail author
  • Gretchen J. A. Hansen
  • Alexander W. Latzka
20th Anniversary Paper

Abstract

Non-native species are a major component of global environmental change, and aquatic systems are especially vulnerable to non-native species impacts. Much of the research on aquatic non-native species impact has occurred at the local or site level. In reality, non-native species impacts play out across multiple spatial scales on heterogeneous landscapes. How can we ‘scale up’ our understanding of site-level impacts to the broader landscape scale? To address this disconnect, we synthesize our current understanding of key components of landscape-scale non-native species impacts: geographic range, abundance, and local impacts. Most aquatic non-native species have small ranges, while a few have large ranges. However, aquatic non-native species are often far from saturated on landscapes, and occurrence records are often woefully incomplete. Aquatic non-native species are often at low abundances where they are present, reaching high abundance in a small number of locations. Finally, local-scale impact can be estimated from abundance, but this requires knowledge of the abundance–impact relationship. Considering these multiple components enables understanding of non-native species impacts at broader spatial scales. Although the landscape-level impacts of aquatic non-native species may be high, the spatial distribution of site-level impacts is uneven, and highly impacted sites may be relatively uncommon. This heterogeneity in impacts provides an opportunity to optimize and prioritize non-native species management and prevention efforts.

Keywords

aquatic non-native range distribution occupancy abundance impact landscape macroecology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the colleagues who have contributed to the research and ideas presented herein: Matt Kornis, Alison Mikulyuk, Jake Walsh, Mona Papes, Sapna Sharma, Julian Olden, and Tony Ricciardi. Alison Mikulyuk provided maps. Special thanks to colleagues at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: Scott Van Egeren, Bob Wakeman, Maureen Ferry, and Tim Asplund. This work was supported by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the National Science Foundation (#CNH-0909281 and #DEB-1440297, NTL-LTER).

References

  1. Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Dollete ESJ, Tomasek BJ. 2013. What is the “real” impact of invasive plant species? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkwitt CE. 2015. Non-linear effects of invasive lionfish density on native coral-reef fish communities. Biological Invasions 17:1383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kuhn I, Kumschick S, Markova Z, Mrugala A, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pysek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vila M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S. 2014. A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS ONE 12(5):e1001850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobeldyk AM, Ruegg J, Lamberti GA. 2015. Freshwater hotspots of biological invasion are a function of species-pathway interactions. Hydrobiologia 746:363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossenbroek JM, Kraft CE, Nekola JC. 2001. Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: Zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecological Applications 11:1778–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boylen C, Eichler L, Madsen J. 1999. Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415:207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JH. 1995. Macroecology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown JH, Maurer BA. 1989. Macroecology—the Division of Food and Space among Species on Continents. Science 243:1145–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown JH, Mehlman DW, Stevens GC. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology 76:2028–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno JF, Kennedy CW, Rand TA, Grant MB. 2004. Landscape-scale patterns of biological invasions in shoreline plant communities. Oikos 107:531–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox JG, Lima SL. 2006. Naivete and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:674–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crall AW, Meyerson LA, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Newman GJ, Graham J. 2006. Show me the numbers: what data currently exist for non-native species in the USA? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:414–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Waller DM, Graham J. 2010. Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions 12:3419–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crooks JA. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crooks JA, Soule ME. 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A editors. Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Delaney DG, Leung B. 2010. An empirical probability model of detecting species at low densities. Ecological Applications 20:1162–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dick JTA, Gallagher K, Aviljas S, Clarke HC, Lewis SE, Leung S, Minchin D, Caffrey J, Alexander ME, Maguire C, Harrod C, Reid N, Haddaway NR, Farnsworth KD, Penk M, Ricciardi A. 2013. Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses. Biological Invasions 15:837–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dick JTA, Alexander ME, Jeschke JM, Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ, Robinson TB, Kumschick S, Weyl OLF, Dunn AM, Hatcher MJ, Paterson RA, Farnsworth KD, Richardson DM. 2014. Advancing impact prediction and hypotheses testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biological Invasions 16:735–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z, Knowler D, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81:163–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Elith J, Leathwick JR. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanations and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:677–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. Journal of Applied Ecology 14:263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2008. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters 4:423–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuller PF, Benson AJ. 2009. Nonindigenous aquatic species database. Gainesville, Florida http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.asp?speciesID=2265 Accessed 6/30/2010. United States Geological Survey.
  25. Gaeta JW, Beardmore B, Latzka AW, Provencher B, Carpenter SR. 2013. Catch-and-release rates of sport fishes in northern Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:606–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallo T, Waitt D. 2011. Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. Bioscience 61:459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaston KJ. 1996. Species-range-size distributions: Patterns, mechanisms, and implications. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaston KJ. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM. 2000. Pattern and process in macroecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gido KB, Brown JH. 1999. Invasion of North American drainages by alien fish species. Freshwater Biology 42:387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham J, Newman G, Jarnevich CS, Shory R, Stohlgren TJ. 2007. A global organism detection and monitoring system for non-native species. Ecological Informatics 2:177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guisan A, Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8:993–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guo QF, Olden JD. 2014. Spatial Scaling of Non-Native Fish Richness across the United States. PLoS ONE 9(5):e97727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansen GJA, Hein CL, Roth BM, Vander Zanden MJ, Gaeta JW, Latzka AW, Carpenter SR. 2013a. Food web consequences of long-term invasive crayfish control. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70:1109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen GJA, Ives AR, Vander Zanden MJ, Carpenter SR. 2013b. Are rapid transitions between invasive and native species caused by alternative stable states, and does it matter? Ecology 94:2207–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen GJA, Vander Zanden MJ, Blum MJ, Clayton MK, Hain EF, Hauxwell J, Izzo M, Kornis MS, McIntyre PB, Mikulyuk A, Nilsson E, Olden JD, Papes M, Sharma S. 2013c. Commonly Rare and Rarely Common: Comparing Population Abundance of Invasive and Native Aquatic Species. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Harvey CT, Qureshi SA, MacIsaac HJ. 2009. Detection of a colonizing, aquatic, non-indigenous species. Diversity and Distributions 15:429–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgins SN, Vander Zanden MJ. 2010. What a difference a species makes: a meta-analysis of dreissenid mussel impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 80:179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson MC, Ruiz-Navarro A, Britton JR. 2015. Population density modifies the ecological impacts of invasive species. Oikos 124:880–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jelks HL, Walsh SJ, Burkhead NM, Contreras-Balderas S, Diaz-Pardo E, Hendrickson DA, Lyons J, Mandrak NE, McCormick F, Nelson JS, Platania SP, Porter BA, Renaud CB, Schmitter-Soto JJ, Taylor EB, Warren ML. 2008. Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes. Fisheries 33:372–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM. 2011. “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters 4:150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeschke JM, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Essl F, Evans T, Gaertner M, Hulme PE, Kuhn I, Mrugala A, Pergl J, Pysek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vila M, Winter M, Kumschick S. 2015. Defining the impact of non-native species. Conservation Biology 28:1188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson LE, Ricciardi A, Carlton JT. 2001. Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: A risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecological Applications 11:1789–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kelly NE, Wantola K, Weisz E, Yan ND. 2013. Recreational boats as a vector of secondary spread for aquatic invasive species and native crustacean zooplankton. Biological Invasions 15:509–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kornis MS, Carlson J, Lehrer-Brey G, Vander Zanden MJ. 2014. Experimental evidence that impacts of an invasive fish are reduced at high densities. Oecologia 175:325–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Kulhanek SA, Leung B, Ricciardi A. 2011a. Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp. Ecological Applications 21:203–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kulhanek SA, Ricciardi A, Leung B. 2011b. Is invasion history a useful tool for predicting the impacts of the world’s worst aquatic invasive species? Ecological Applications 21:189–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kumschick S, Richardson DM. 2013. Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: Advances and challenges. Diversity and Distributions 19:1095–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vila M, Essl F, Jeschke JM, Pysek P, Ricciardi A, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Evans T, Hulme PE, Kuhn I, Mrugala A, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Winter M. 2015. Ecological Impacts of Alien Species: Quantification, Scope, Caveats, and Recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kunin WE. 1998. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281:1513–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Latzka AW. 2015. Landscape-scale patterns in aquatic invasions: Prevalence, colonization, establishment, and impacts. University of Wisconsin—Madison.Google Scholar
  53. Latzka AW, Hansen GJA, Kornis M, Vander Zanden MJ. 2016. Spatial heterogeneity in invasive species impact at the landscape scale. Ecosphere 7: e01311. 01310.01002/ecs01312.01311.Google Scholar
  54. Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S. 2008. Fish invasions in the world’s river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. Plos Biology 6:404–10.Google Scholar
  55. Leung B, Mandrak NE. 2007. The risk of establishment of aquatic invasive species: joining invasibility and propagule pressure. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 274:2603–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP. 2013. Invasion ecology. 2nd edn. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. p 444p.Google Scholar
  57. Lodge DM, Shrader-Frechette K. 2003. Nonindigenous species: Ecological explanation, environmental ethics, and public policy. Conservation Biology 17:31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lodge DM, Stein RA, Brown KM, Covich AP, Bronmark C, Garvey JE, Klosiewski SP. 1998. Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: Challenges in spatial scaling. Australian Journal of Ecology 23:53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacIsaac HJ, Ketelaars HAM, Grigorovich IA, Ramcharan CW, Yan ND. 2000. Modeling Bythotrephes longimanus invasion in the Great Lakes basin based on its European distribution. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 149:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Matsuzaki SS, Usio N, Takamura N, Washitani I. 2009. Contrasting impacts of invasive engineers on freshwater ecosystems: an experiment and meta-analysis. Oecologia 158:673–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Mercado-Silva N, Olden JD, Maxted JT, Hrabik TR, Vander Zanden MJ. 2006. Forecasting the spread of invasive rainbow smelt in the Laurentian Great Lakes region of North America. Conservation Biology 20:1740–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Moorhouse TP, Macdonald DW. 2015. Are invasives worse in freshwater than terrestrial ecosystems? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water 2:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Naddafi R, Blenckner T, Eklov P, Pettersson K. 2011. Physical and chemical properties determine zebra mussel invasion success in lakes. Hydrobiologia 699:227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olenin S, Narščius A, Minchin D, David M, Galil B, Gollasch S, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Ojaveer H, Zaiko A. 2014. Making non-indigenous species information systems practical for management and useful for research: An aquatic perspective. Biological Conservation 173:98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Papeş M, Gaubert P. 2007. Modelling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences: assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents. Diversity and Distributions 13:890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham W, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L. 1999. Impact: Towards a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1:3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pejchar L, Mooney HA. 2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J. 2015. Mechanistic and Correlative Models of Ecological Niches. European Journal of Ecology 1:28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications 19:181–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pysek P, Hulme PE. 2009. Invasion biology is a discipline that’s too young to die. Nature 460:324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Rahel FJ. 2000. Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288:854–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ramcharan CW, Padilla DK, Dodson SI. 1992. Models to predict potential occurrence and density of zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:2611–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ricciardi A. 2003. Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshwater Biology 48:972–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ricciardi A, Palmer ME, Yan ND. 2011. Should biological invasions be managed as natural disasters? Bioscience 61:312–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ricciardi A, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP, Lockwood JL. 2013. Progress towards understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecological Monographs 83:263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roth BM, Tetzlaff JC, Alexander ML, Kitchell JF. 2007. Reciprocal relationships between exotic rusty crayfish, macrophytes, and Lepomis species in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecosystems 10:74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:305–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH. 2000. Biodiversity: Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Schade CB, Bonar SA. 2005. Distribution and abundance of nonnative fishes in streams of the Western United States. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:1386–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scheffer M. 1998. Ecology of shallow lakes. London: Chapman and Hall. p 357p.Google Scholar
  84. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR. 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:648–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Simpson A, Jarnevich CS, Madsen J, Westbrooks R, Fournier C, Mehrhoff L, Browne M, Graham J, Sellers E. 2009. Invasive species information networks: collaboration at multiple scales for prevention, early detection, and rapid response to invasive alien species. Biodiversity 10:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Strayer DL. 2010. Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwater Biology 55:152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Strayer DL. 2012. Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 15:1199–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Strayer DL, Dudgeon D. 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:344–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thiele J, Kollmann J, Markussen B, Otte A. 2010. Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions 12:2025–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thomsen MS, Olden JD, Wernberg T, Griffin JN, Silliman BR. 2011. A broad framework to organize and compare ecological invasion impacts. Environmental Research 111:899–908.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Vander Zanden MJ, Olden JD. 2008. A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65:1512–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vander Zanden MJ, Olden JD, Thorne JH, Mandrak NE. 2004. Predicting occurrences and impacts of bass introductions in north temperate lakes. Ecological Applications 14:132–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vander Zanden MJ, Lapointe NWR, Marchetti MP. 2015. Non-indigenous fishes and their role in freshwater fish imperilment. Closs GP, Krkosek M, Olden JD editors. Conservation of Freshwater Fishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p238–269.Google Scholar
  95. Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ, Mills EL, Holeck KT, Liebig JR, Grigorovich IA, Ojaveer H. 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Walsh JR, Carpenter SR, Vander Zanden MJ. 2016. Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:4081–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems. Fort Worth: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  98. Wilson KA. 2002. Impacts of the invasive rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) in northern Wisconsin lakes. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  99. Wilson AE, Sarnelle O. 2002. Relationship between zebra mussel biomass and total phosphorus in European and North American lakes. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 153:339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wilson KA, Magnuson JJ, Lodge DM, Hill AM, Kratz TK, Perry WL, Willis TV. 2004. A long-term rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) invasion: dispersal patterns and community change in a north temperate lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:2255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yokomizo H, Possingham HP, Thomas MB, Buckley YM. 2009. Managing the impact of invasive species: the value of knowing the density-impact curve. Ecological Applications 19:376–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Jake Vander Zanden
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gretchen J. A. Hansen
    • 2
  • Alexander W. Latzka
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for LimnologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySte. Anne de BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations