Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 527–542 | Cite as

The Contribution of Photodegradation to Litter Decomposition in Semiarid Mediterranean Grasslands Depends on its Interaction with Local Humidity Conditions, Litter Quality and Position

  • María Almagro
  • Javier Martínez-López
  • Fernando T. Maestre
  • Ana Rey
Article

Abstract

Understanding how UV radiation interacts with prevailing climatic conditions and litter quality to determine leaf litter decomposition is fundamental for understanding soil carbon cycling pathways and ecosystem functioning in drylands. We carried out a field manipulative experiment to investigate how litter quality (labile and nitrogen-rich Retama sphaerocarpa vs. recalcitrant and nitrogen-poor Stipa tenacissima), position (on the ground vs. standing) and different UV radiation levels (UV pass vs. UV block) affect litter decomposition rates at two semiarid Mediterranean steppes with contrasting climates (continental vs. maritime) in a fully factorial experimental design. As expected, Retama litter decomposed faster than that of Stipa, and litter placed on the ground decayed faster than standing litter. However, and surprisingly, contrasting effects of UV radiation on litter decomposition were observed between the two sites. At the continental site, UV radiation increased litter decay constants by 21% on average, although the contribution of photodegradation was larger when litter was placed on the ground rather than in standing litter. At the maritime site, decay constants were 15% larger in the absence of UV radiation regardless of litter position. Significant litter type × UV exposure radiation and litter type × position interactions indicate that photodegradation contributes more to litter decomposition under less favorable moisture and substrate availability conditions for microbial decomposers. Our results emphasize the need to consider interactions between moisture availability, litter quality and UV radiation in litter decomposition models to fully understand litter decomposition impacts on soil carbon cycling and storage in drylands under climate change.

Keywords

leaf litter decomposition Stipa tenacissima Retama sphaerocarpa photodegradation moisture availability litter chemistry drylands 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Amy Austin for supporting this research at its early stage, and José M. Grünzweig for his help with the experimental design. The authors also thank María Martínez-Mena and Miguel Ángel Sánchez Monedero for providing laboratory facilities at CEBAS, and Eloisa García for her help with litterbags construction. This research was supported by funds from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project CGL2011-24748/PHOTODEG) and by the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant agreement 242658 (BIOCOM). The State Agency of Meteorology (AEMET) is also acknowledged for providing solar UV radiation data.

Supplementary material

10021_2016_36_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (14.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 14480 kb)

References

  1. Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC. 2008. Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Global Change Biology 14:2636–60.Google Scholar
  2. Almagro M, Maestre FT, Martínez-López J, Valencia E, Rey A. 2015. Climate change may reduce litter decomposition while enhancing the contribution of photodegradation in dry perennial Mediterranean grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 90:214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almagro M, Martínez-Mena M. 2012. Exploring short-term leaf litter decomposition dynamics in a Mediterranean ecosystem: Dependence on litter type and site conditions. Plant and Soil 358:323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anesio AM, Denward CMT, Tranvik LJ, Granéli W. 1999. Decreased bacterial growth on vascular plant detritus due to photochemical modification. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 17:159–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin AT, Ballaré CL. 2010. Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:4618–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin AT, Vivanco L. 2006. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker NR, Allison SD. 2015. Ultraviolet photodegradation facilitates microbial litter decomposition in a Mediterranean climate. Ecology 96:1994–2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes PW, Throop HL, Archer SR, Breshears DD, McCulley RL, Tobler MA. 2015. Sunlight and soil-litter mixing: drivers of litter decomposition in drylands. Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, editors. Progress in Botany. Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp 273-302.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes PW, Throop HL, Hewins DB, Abbene ML, Archer SR. 2012. Soil coverage reduces photodegradation and promotes the development of soil-microbial films on dryland leaf litter. Ecosystems 15:311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornman JF, Barnes PW, Robinson SA, Ballaré CL, Flint SD, Caldwell MM. 2015. Solar ultraviolet radiation and ozonedepletion-driven climate change: effects on terrestrial ecosystems. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 14:88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt LA, Bonnet C, King JY. 2009. Photochemically induced carbon dioxide production as a mechanism for carbon loss from plant litter in arid ecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 114:1–13.Google Scholar
  12. Brandt LA, King JY, Hobbie SE, Milchunas DG, Sinsabaugh RL. 2010. The role of photodegradation in surface litter decomposition across a grassland ecosystem precipitation gradient. Ecosystems 13:765–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandt LA, King JY, Milchunas DG. 2007. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Global Change Biology 13:2193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day TA, Guénon R, Ruhland CT. 2015. Photodegradation of plant litter in the Sonoran Desert varies by litter type and age. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 89:109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Day TA, Zhang ET, Ruhland CT. 2007. Exposure to solar UV-B radiation accelerates mass and lignin loss of Larrea tridentata litter in the Sonoran Desert. Plant Ecology 193:185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dirks I, Navon Y, Kanas D, Dumbur R, Grünzweig JM. 2010. Atmospheric water vapor as driver of litter decomposition in Mediterranean shrubland and grassland during rainless seasons. Global Change Biology 16:2799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duguay KJ, Klironomos JN. 2000. Direct and indirect effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on the decomposing and competitive abilities of saprobic fungi. Applied Soil Ecology 14:157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO. 1989. Arid Zone Forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome: A Guide for Field Technicians.Google Scholar
  20. Feng X, Hills KM, Simpson AJ, Whalen JK, Simpson MJ. 2011. The role of biodegradation and photo-oxidation in the transformation of terrigenous organic matter. Organic Geochemistry 42:262–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foereid B, Bellarby J, Meier-Augenstein W, Kemp H. 2010. Does light exposure make plant litter more degradable? Plant and Soil 333:275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallo ME, Porras-Alfaro A, Odenbach KJ, Sinsabaugh RL. 2009. Photoacceleration of plant litter decomposition in an arid environment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41:1433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallo ME, Sinsabaugh RL, Cabaniss SE. 2006. The role of ultraviolet radiation in litter decomposition in arid ecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology 34:82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giorgi F, Lionello P. 2008. Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global and Planetary Change 63:90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry HAL, Brizgys K, Field CB. 2008. Litter decomposition in a California annual grassland: Interactions between photodegradation and litter layer thickness. Ecosystems 11:545–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewins DB, Archer SR, Okin GS, McCulley RL, Throop HL. 2012. Soil-litter mixing accelerates decomposition in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Ecosystems 16:183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houérou HNL. 2001. Biogeography of the arid steppeland north of the Sahara. Journal of Arid Environments 48:103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang J, Yu H, Guan X, Wang G, Guo R. 2016. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nature Climate Change 6:166–71.Google Scholar
  29. IPCC. 2013. Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  30. Jacobson K, van Diepeningen A, Evans S, Fritts R, Gemmel P, Marsho C, Seely M, Wenndt A, Yang X, Jacobson P. 2015. Non-rainfall moisture activates fungal decomposition of surface litter in the Namib Sand Sea. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson D. 2003. Response of terrestrial microorganisms to ultraviolet-B radiation in ecosystems. Research in Microbiology 154:315–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. King JY, Brandt LA, Adair EC. 2012. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: Advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111:57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee H, Fitzgerald J, Hewins DB, McCulley RL, Archer SR, Rahn T, Throop HL. 2014. Soil moisture and soil-litter mixing effects on surface litter decomposition: A controlled environment assessment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 72:123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee H, Rahn T, Throop H. 2012. An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Global Change Biology 18:1185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin Y, King J, Karlen S, Ralph J. 2015a. Using 2D NMR spectroscopy to assess effects of UV radiation on cell wall chemistry during litter decomposition. Biogeochemistry 125:427–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin Y, King JY. 2014. Effects of UV exposure and litter position on decomposition in a California grassland. Ecosystems 17:158–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin Y, Scarlett R, King J. 2015b. Effects of UV photodegradation on subsequent microbial decomposition of Bromus diandrus litter. Plant and Soil 395:263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer LM, Thornton KR, Schick LL, Jastrow JD, Harden JW. 2012. Photodissolution of soil organic matter. Geoderma 170:314–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: Plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant and Soil 115:189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moody SA, Paul ND, Björn L, Callaghan TV, Lee JA, Manetas Y, Rozema J, Gwynn-Jones D, Johanson U, Kyparissis A, Oudejans AC. 2001. The direct effects of UV-B radiation on Betula pubescens litter decomposing at four European field sites. Plant Ecology 154:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moorhead DL, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh RL. 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 53:133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL. 2006. A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecological Monographs 76(2):151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newsham KK, McLeod AR, Roberts JD, Greenslade PD, Emmett BA. 1997. Direct Effects of Elevated UV-B radiation on the decomposition of Quercus robur leaf litter. Oikos 79:592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pancotto V, Sala OE, Cabello M, López NI, Robsons TM, Ballaré CL, Caldwell MM. 2003. Solar UV-B decreases decomposition in herbaceous plant litter in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina: Potential role of an altered decomposer community. Global Change Biology 9:1465–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pan X, Song YB, Liu GF, Hu YK, Ye XH, Cornwell WK, Prinzing A, Dong M, Cornelissen JHC. 2015. Functional traits drive the contribution of solar radiation to leaf litter decomposition among multiple arid-zone species. Scientific Reports 5:13217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rozema J, Tosserams M, Nelissen HJM, van Heerwaarden L, Broekman RA, Flierman N. 1997. Stratospheric ozone reduction and ecosystem processes: Enhanced UV-B radiation affects chemical quality and decomposition of leaves of the dune grassland species Calamagrostis epigeios. Plant Ecology 128:285–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saura-Mas S, Estiarte M, Peñuelas J, Lloret F. 2012. Effects of climate change on leaf litter decomposition across post-fire plant regenerative groups. Environmental and Experimental Botany 77:274–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schade GW, Hofmann RM, Crutzen PJ. 1999. CO emissions from degrading plant matter. Tellus B 51:889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith WK, Gao W, Steltzer H, Wallenstein MD, Tree R. 2010. Moisture availability influences the effect of ultraviolet-B radiation on leaf litter decomposition. Global Change Biology 16:484–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Song X, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Zhou G, Zhang S, Peng C. 2014. Interactive effects of elevated UV-B radiation and N deposition on decomposition of Moso bamboo litter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 69:11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Throop HL, Archer SR. 2009. Resolving the dryland decomposition conundrum: Some new perspectives on potential drivers. Progress in Botany 70:171–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Uclés O, Villagarcía L, Moro MJ, Cantón Y, Domingo F. 2014. Role of dewfall in the water balance of a semiarid coastal steppe ecosystem. Hydrological Processes 28:2271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. UNEP. 2016. Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: progress report, 2015. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences 15:141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valladares F, Pugnaire FI. 1999. Tradeoffs between irradiance capture and avoidance in semiarid environments assessed with a crown architecture model. Annals of Botany 83:459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Soest P, Robertson J, Lewis B. 1991. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Verhoef HA, Verspagen JMH, Zoomer HR. 2000. Direct and indirect effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on soil biota, decomposition and nutrient fluxes in dune grassland soil systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31:366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang J, Liu L, Wang X, Chen Y. 2015. The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Global Change Biology 21:2095–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Williamson CE, Zepp RG, Lucas RM, Madronich S, Austin AT, Ballare CL, Norval M, Sulzberger B, Bais AF, McKenzie RL, Robinson SA, Hader DP, Paul ND, Bornman JF. 2014. Solar ultraviolet radiation in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change 4:434–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zepp RG, Erickson DJ, Paul ND, Sulzberger B. 2011. Effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling: interactions and feedbacks. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 10:261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Almagro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Javier Martínez-López
    • 3
  • Fernando T. Maestre
    • 4
  • Ana Rey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biogeography and Global ChangeMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, MNCN-CSICMadridSpain
  2. 2.Soil and Water Conservation Research GroupCentro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CEBAS-CSICMurciaSpain
  3. 3.Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Edificio Sede No. 1, Planta 1ª, Parque Científico de UPV/EHULeioaSpain
  4. 4.Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y TecnologíaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstolesSpain

Personalised recommendations