Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trade: A Driver of Present and Future Ecosystems

  • 20th Anniversary Paper
  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growing trade among nations is globalizing economies and driving environmental change. As a consequence, trade affects ecosystems, but trade is not currently a major topic in ecosystem research based on a survey of ecological journals. This survey reveals trade is rarely a title word or topic except for studies considering the movement of species or sustainability. However, when trade is considered at large scales, ecosystem mass balances are significantly influenced by traded products such as the nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilizers and livestock feeds. Trade also depletes resource species leading to ecosystem alterations such as the elimination of large predators and filter feeders in aquatic ecosystems and landscape conversion with attendant changes in biogeochemistry and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Trade is a source of alien species introductions. Trade also creates telecouplings among distant locations that cause changes in ecosystems including changes that may affect whether an ecosystem is a source or sink in relation to atmospheric carbon dioxide. There is a need for improved data tracing traded products, understanding the linkages of trade between ecosystem sources and sinks, and developing new methods and models to analyze trade impacts. Studies of trade impacts in relation to questions about changing ecological processes and the trajectory of ecosystems represent an important frontier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson G, Hamilton K, Ruta G, Van Der Mensbrugghe D. 2011. Trade in ‘virtual carbon’: empirical results and implications for policy. Global Environ Chang 21:563–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkes F, Folke C, Eds. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer EW, Goodale CL, Jaworski NA, Howarth RW. 2002. Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen exports in the northeastern U.S.A. Biogeochemistry 57(58):137–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteny-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte AM. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Raymond PA, Strayer DL, Pace ML, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid, river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78:588–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JA, D’Odorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L. 2013. Recent history and geography of virtual water trade. Plos One 8:e55825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cease AJ, Elser JJ, Fenichel EP, Hadrich JC, Harrison JF, Robinson BE. 2016. Living with locusts: connecting soil, nitrogen, locust outbreaks, livelihoods, and livestock markets. Bioscience 65:551–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan H-K, Zhang H, Yang F, Fischer G. 2015. Improve customs systems to monitor global wildlife trade. Science 348:291–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comtrade. 2010. UN commodity trade statistics database (http://comtrade.un.or/db/dqBasicQuery.aspx) United Nations.

  • Crona BI, Van Holt T, Petersson M, Daw TM, Buchary E. 2015. Using social-ecological syndromes to understand impacts of international seafood trade on small-scale fisheries. Global Environ Chang 35:162–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalin C, Konar M, Hanasaki N, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2012. Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:5989–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, de Araujo AC, Artaxo P, Balch JK, Brown IF, Bustamante MMC, Coe MT, DeFries RS, Keller M, Longo M, Munger JW, Shroeder W, Soares BS, Souza CM, Wofsy SC. 2012. The Amazon basin in transition. Nature 481:321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis KF, D’Odorico P, Rulli MC. 2014. Land grabbing: a preliminary quantification of economic impacts on rural livelihoods. Popul Environ 36:180–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Fries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3:178–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Odorico P, Carr JA, Laio F, Ridolfi L. 2012. Spatial organization and drivers of the virtual water trade: a community-structure analysis. Environ Res Lett 9:034007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Terbough J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, TE Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK, Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soule ME, Virtanen R, Wardle DA. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333:301–6

  • Ericksson H, Osterblom H, Crona B, Troell M, Andrews N, Wilen J, Folke C. 2015. Contagious exploitation of marine resources. Front Ecol Environ 13:435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley J, Costanza R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol Econ 69:2060–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT database (FAOSTAT, 2014). [online] URL: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowsk JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 574:570–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagern A, van den Bergh J. 2013. A critical review of fishing agreements with tropical developing countries. Marine Policy 38:375–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Gars J, Moberg F, Nykvist B, Repinski C. 2015. Why ecologists should care about financial markets. Trends Ecol Evolut 30:571–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart JA, Pace ML. 2015. Structure and evolution of the global seafood trade network. Environ Res Lett 10:125014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart JA, Rovenskaya E, Dieckmann U, Pace ML, Brännström Å. 2016. Vulnerability to shocks in the global seafood trade network. Environ Res Lett 11:035008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST. 2003. Patterns and mechanisms of the forest carbon cycle. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 28:169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel TW, Golub AA, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Plevin RJ, Kammen DM. 2010. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: Estimating market mediated responses. Bioscience 60:223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Hilborn U. 2012. Overfishing: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, Loucks C, Harriss R, Lawrence WT. 2004. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature 429:870–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC. 2015. Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastner T, Erb K-H, Haberl H. 2015. Global human appropriation of net primary production for biomass consumption in the European Union, 1986-2007. J Ind Ecol 19:825–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger G, Herold M, de Sy V. 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: a synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Vancouver: Lexeme Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick AM. 2011. Globalization, land use, and the invasion of West Nile virus. Science 334:323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T. 2011. Ecosystem services and global trade of natural resources. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuebbing SE, Nunez MA. 2015. Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications. Global Chang Biol 21:926–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Moran D, Bhaduri A, Kanemoto K, Bekchanov M, Geschke A, Foran B. 2013. International trade of scarce water. Ecol Econ 94:78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T, Feng F, Hertel TW, Cesar Izaurralde R, Lambin EF, Li S, Martinelli LA, McConnell WJ, Moran EF, Naylor R, Ouyang Z, Polenske KR, Reenberg A, de Miranda Rocha G, Simmons CS, Verburg PH, Vitousek PM, Zhang F, Zhu C. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc 18(2):26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Melendez LA, Bennett EM. 2016. Trade in the US and Mexico helps reduce environmental costs of agriculture. Environ Res Lett 11:055004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF. 2010. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20917–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naudt K, Chen Y, McGrath MJ, Ryder J, Valade A, Otto J, Luyssaert S. 2016. Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351:597–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad DC, Stickler CM, Almeida OT. 2006. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 20:1595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Strayer DL, Fischer D, Malcom HM. 2010. Increased mortality of an invasive mussel associated with recovery of native zooplankton. Ecosphere 1:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rametsteineer E, Simula M. 2003. Forest certification—an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Environ Manag 67:87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A. 2006. Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers Distrib 12:425–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S, Mason-D’Croz D, Sulser T, Islam S, Robertson R, Zhu T, Gueneau A, Pitois G, Rosegrant MW. 2015. The international model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT): model description for version 3. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1483. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2741234.

  • Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork SJ, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK, De Fries R, Asner G, Laurence WF. 2009. Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 23:1396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rulli MC, Saviori A, D’Odorico P. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:892–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schipanski ME, Bennett EM. 2012. The influence of agricultural trade and livestock production on the global phosphorus cycle. Ecosystems 15:256–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seebens H, Essl F, Dawson W, Fuentes N, Moser D, Pergl J, Pysek P, Van Kleunen M, Weber E, Winter M, Blasius B. 2015. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Global Chang Biol 21:4128–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Mysterud A, Lima M, Chan KS, Yoccoz NG, Adlandsvik B. 2003. Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Nino Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:2087–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evolut 21:645–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Cole JJ, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT, Gephart JA, Malcom HM, Pace ML, Rosi-Marshall EJ. 2014. Decadal-scale change in a large-river ecosystem. Bioscience 64:496–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatem AJ, Hay SI, Rogers DJ. 2006. Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6242–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vernberg R, Stechfest E, Woltjer G, Eichhout B. 2009. The effect of agricultural trade liberalization on land-use related greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environ Chang 19:434–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanger TC. 2011. The Lithium future—resources, recycling, and the environment. Conserv Lett 4:202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner H, Bronnimann S, Casty C, Gyalistras D, Luterbacher J, Schmutz C, Stephenson DB, Xoplaki E. 2001. North Atlantic Oscillation—concepts and studies. Surv Geophys 22(4):321–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CSC, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Aydin A, Wong MH. 2007. Evidence of excessive releases of metals from primitive e-water processing in Guiyu, China. Environ Pollut 148:62–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. 2013. The future of trade: the challenges of convergence report of the panel on defining the future of trade convened by WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wang I, Abbaspour KC, Zehnder AJB. 2006. Virtual water trade: an assessment of water use efficiency in the international food trade. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:443–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSF Grant DEB1456151 and an NSF graduate research fellowship. We thank the “Footprint Group” at the University of Virginia for stimulating our interest in the topic of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael L. Pace.

Additional information

Author contributions

MLP conceived the paper and consulted with JAG to develop an initial outline. Both authors contributed to the analysis, figure construction, and writing that led to the final version of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pace, M.L., Gephart, J.A. Trade: A Driver of Present and Future Ecosystems. Ecosystems 20, 44–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0021-z

Keywords

Navigation