Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 44–53 | Cite as

Trade: A Driver of Present and Future Ecosystems

  • Michael L. PaceEmail author
  • Jessica A. Gephart
20th Anniversary Paper

Abstract

Growing trade among nations is globalizing economies and driving environmental change. As a consequence, trade affects ecosystems, but trade is not currently a major topic in ecosystem research based on a survey of ecological journals. This survey reveals trade is rarely a title word or topic except for studies considering the movement of species or sustainability. However, when trade is considered at large scales, ecosystem mass balances are significantly influenced by traded products such as the nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilizers and livestock feeds. Trade also depletes resource species leading to ecosystem alterations such as the elimination of large predators and filter feeders in aquatic ecosystems and landscape conversion with attendant changes in biogeochemistry and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Trade is a source of alien species introductions. Trade also creates telecouplings among distant locations that cause changes in ecosystems including changes that may affect whether an ecosystem is a source or sink in relation to atmospheric carbon dioxide. There is a need for improved data tracing traded products, understanding the linkages of trade between ecosystem sources and sinks, and developing new methods and models to analyze trade impacts. Studies of trade impacts in relation to questions about changing ecological processes and the trajectory of ecosystems represent an important frontier.

Keywords

trade ecosystems mass balance alien species telecoupling resource depletion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSF Grant DEB1456151 and an NSF graduate research fellowship. We thank the “Footprint Group” at the University of Virginia for stimulating our interest in the topic of this paper.

References

  1. Atkinson G, Hamilton K, Ruta G, Van Der Mensbrugghe D. 2011. Trade in ‘virtual carbon’: empirical results and implications for policy. Global Environ Chang 21:563–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkes F, Folke C, Eds. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer EW, Goodale CL, Jaworski NA, Howarth RW. 2002. Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen exports in the northeastern U.S.A. Biogeochemistry 57(58):137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteny-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte AM. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Raymond PA, Strayer DL, Pace ML, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid, river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78:588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr JA, D’Odorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L. 2013. Recent history and geography of virtual water trade. Plos One 8:e55825.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cease AJ, Elser JJ, Fenichel EP, Hadrich JC, Harrison JF, Robinson BE. 2016. Living with locusts: connecting soil, nitrogen, locust outbreaks, livelihoods, and livestock markets. Bioscience 65:551–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan H-K, Zhang H, Yang F, Fischer G. 2015. Improve customs systems to monitor global wildlife trade. Science 348:291–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Comtrade. 2010. UN commodity trade statistics database (http://comtrade.un.or/db/dqBasicQuery.aspx) United Nations.
  10. Crona BI, Van Holt T, Petersson M, Daw TM, Buchary E. 2015. Using social-ecological syndromes to understand impacts of international seafood trade on small-scale fisheries. Global Environ Chang 35:162–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalin C, Konar M, Hanasaki N, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2012. Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:5989–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson EA, de Araujo AC, Artaxo P, Balch JK, Brown IF, Bustamante MMC, Coe MT, DeFries RS, Keller M, Longo M, Munger JW, Shroeder W, Soares BS, Souza CM, Wofsy SC. 2012. The Amazon basin in transition. Nature 481:321–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis KF, D’Odorico P, Rulli MC. 2014. Land grabbing: a preliminary quantification of economic impacts on rural livelihoods. Popul Environ 36:180–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. De Fries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3:178–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’Odorico P, Carr JA, Laio F, Ridolfi L. 2012. Spatial organization and drivers of the virtual water trade: a community-structure analysis. Environ Res Lett 9:034007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estes JA, Terbough J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, TE Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK, Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soule ME, Virtanen R, Wardle DA. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333:301–6Google Scholar
  17. Ericksson H, Osterblom H, Crona B, Troell M, Andrews N, Wilen J, Folke C. 2015. Contagious exploitation of marine resources. Front Ecol Environ 13:435–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farley J, Costanza R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol Econ 69:2060–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT database (FAOSTAT, 2014). [online] URL: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E
  20. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowsk JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 574:570–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gagern A, van den Bergh J. 2013. A critical review of fishing agreements with tropical developing countries. Marine Policy 38:375–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galaz V, Gars J, Moberg F, Nykvist B, Repinski C. 2015. Why ecologists should care about financial markets. Trends Ecol Evolut 30:571–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gephart JA, Pace ML. 2015. Structure and evolution of the global seafood trade network. Environ Res Lett 10:125014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gephart JA, Rovenskaya E, Dieckmann U, Pace ML, Brännström Å. 2016. Vulnerability to shocks in the global seafood trade network. Environ Res Lett 11:035008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gower ST. 2003. Patterns and mechanisms of the forest carbon cycle. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 28:169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hertel TW, Golub AA, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Plevin RJ, Kammen DM. 2010. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: Estimating market mediated responses. Bioscience 60:223–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilborn R, Hilborn U. 2012. Overfishing: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, Loucks C, Harriss R, Lawrence WT. 2004. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature 429:870–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson MC. 2015. Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kastner T, Erb K-H, Haberl H. 2015. Global human appropriation of net primary production for biomass consumption in the European Union, 1986-2007. J Ind Ecol 19:825–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kissinger G, Herold M, de Sy V. 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: a synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Vancouver: Lexeme Consulting.Google Scholar
  34. Kilpatrick AM. 2011. Globalization, land use, and the invasion of West Nile virus. Science 334:323–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Koellner T. 2011. Ecosystem services and global trade of natural resources. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kuebbing SE, Nunez MA. 2015. Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications. Global Chang Biol 21:926–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenzen M, Moran D, Bhaduri A, Kanemoto K, Bekchanov M, Geschke A, Foran B. 2013. International trade of scarce water. Ecol Econ 94:78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T, Feng F, Hertel TW, Cesar Izaurralde R, Lambin EF, Li S, Martinelli LA, McConnell WJ, Moran EF, Naylor R, Ouyang Z, Polenske KR, Reenberg A, de Miranda Rocha G, Simmons CS, Verburg PH, Vitousek PM, Zhang F, Zhu C. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc 18(2):26.Google Scholar
  39. Martinez-Melendez LA, Bennett EM. 2016. Trade in the US and Mexico helps reduce environmental costs of agriculture. Environ Res Lett 11:055004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF. 2010. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20917–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Naudt K, Chen Y, McGrath MJ, Ryder J, Valade A, Otto J, Luyssaert S. 2016. Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351:597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nepstad DC, Stickler CM, Almeida OT. 2006. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 20:1595–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pace ML, Strayer DL, Fischer D, Malcom HM. 2010. Increased mortality of an invasive mussel associated with recovery of native zooplankton. Ecosphere 1:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rametsteineer E, Simula M. 2003. Forest certification—an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Environ Manag 67:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ricciardi A. 2006. Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers Distrib 12:425–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson S, Mason-D’Croz D, Sulser T, Islam S, Robertson R, Zhu T, Gueneau A, Pitois G, Rosegrant MW. 2015. The international model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT): model description for version 3. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1483. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2741234.
  47. Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork SJ, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudel TK, De Fries R, Asner G, Laurence WF. 2009. Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 23:1396–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rulli MC, Saviori A, D’Odorico P. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:892–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Schipanski ME, Bennett EM. 2012. The influence of agricultural trade and livestock production on the global phosphorus cycle. Ecosystems 15:256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seebens H, Essl F, Dawson W, Fuentes N, Moser D, Pergl J, Pysek P, Van Kleunen M, Weber E, Winter M, Blasius B. 2015. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Global Chang Biol 21:4128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simberloff D, Von Holle B. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Mysterud A, Lima M, Chan KS, Yoccoz NG, Adlandsvik B. 2003. Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Nino Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:2087–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evolut 21:645–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strayer DL, Cole JJ, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT, Gephart JA, Malcom HM, Pace ML, Rosi-Marshall EJ. 2014. Decadal-scale change in a large-river ecosystem. Bioscience 64:496–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tatem AJ, Hay SI, Rogers DJ. 2006. Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6242–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Vernberg R, Stechfest E, Woltjer G, Eichhout B. 2009. The effect of agricultural trade liberalization on land-use related greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environ Chang 19:434–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wanger TC. 2011. The Lithium future—resources, recycling, and the environment. Conserv Lett 4:202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wanner H, Bronnimann S, Casty C, Gyalistras D, Luterbacher J, Schmutz C, Stephenson DB, Xoplaki E. 2001. North Atlantic Oscillation—concepts and studies. Surv Geophys 22(4):321–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wong CSC, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Aydin A, Wong MH. 2007. Evidence of excessive releases of metals from primitive e-water processing in Guiyu, China. Environ Pollut 148:62–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. World Trade Organization. 2013. The future of trade: the challenges of convergence report of the panel on defining the future of trade convened by WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  62. Yang H, Wang I, Abbaspour KC, Zehnder AJB. 2006. Virtual water trade: an assessment of water use efficiency in the international food trade. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations