, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1455–1471 | Cite as

Effect of Chronic Versus Pulse Perturbations on a Marine Ecosystem: Integration of Functional Responses Across Organization Levels

  • Fernando Tuya
  • Séfora Betancor
  • María A. Viera-Rodríguez
  • Rayco Guedes
  • Rodrigo Riera
  • Ricardo Haroun
  • Fernando Espino


Human impacts accelerate the intensity and frequency of perturbations on ecosystems; approaches that integrate responses across organization levels are, however, lacking, particularly in the ocean. We experimentally simulated the frequency of fertilization (‘chronic’ versus ‘pulse’ events) in orthogonal combinations of two intensities (‘large’ versus ‘moderate’ fertilization) to determine physiological and biological responses by the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and associated flora (epiphytes and green seaweeds, specifically Caulerpa prolifera), as well as functional changes (community primary and secondary productivity) at the ecosystem level. We predicted that the absence of recovery time from chronic perturbation would more severely affect responses at population and ecosystem levels relative to discrete events (pulses). Nutrient enrichment increased the biomass of C. prolifera irrespective of its frequency, whereas seagrass biomass and shoot density particularly decreased under a chronic scenario. These demographic responses were connected with varying photo-physiological performance of both C. nodosa and C. prolifera. Fertilization, regardless of its intensity and frequency, decreased the maximum photosynthetic rate of C. nodosa, concomitant with increased pigments, particularly under chronic fertilization, and decreased photoprotective (phenols) compounds. In contrast, fertilization boosted the maximum photochemical yield of C. prolifera, in addition to an increase in pigments and photoprotective compounds. Community primary and secondary productivity, however, did not vary under fertilization of varying intensity and frequency. In summary, fertilization precipitated population-level changes in physiological and biological attributes of vegetation. However, fertilization effects did not entirely cascade into ecosystem-level processes, that is, ecosystem productivity, which suggests a functional compensation (that is, increased algal performance to offset losses of seagrass production) during the initial stages of fertilization.


nutrients ecosystem perturbation frequency of perturbation marine vegetation temporal variability marine angiosperms green macroalgae Atlantic Ocean 



Fernando Tuya was supported by the MINECO ‘Ramón y Cajal’ program. Part of this study was performed through the project ECOSERVEG (BEST initiative, Voluntary Scheme for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Territories of the EU Outermost Regions and Oversees Countries and Territories, Grant No. 07.032700/2012/635752/SUB/B2) and the Spanish MINECO ‘Plan Nacional’ (CGL 2011-23833, ANTROTIDAL). The research staff was partially supported by the Campus Atlántico Tricontinental. We acknowledge Tony Sánchez for his help during fieldwork. Iacopo Bertocci and several anonymous reviewers provided positive criticism on previous drafts.

Supplementary material

10021_2015_9911_MOESM1_ESM.docx (278 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 277 kb)


  1. Antón A, Cebrián J, Heck K, Duarte CM, Sheehan KL, Miller MEC, Foster CD. 2011. Decoupled effects (positive to negative) of nutrient enrichment on ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 21:991–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barberá C, Tuya F, Boyra A, Sánchez-Jerez P, Blanch I, Haroun RJ. 2005. Spatial variation in the structural parameters of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows in the Canary Islands: a multiscaled approach. Bot Mar 48:122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer S, Björk M, Gademann R, Ralph PJ. 2001. Measurements of photosynthetic rates in seagrasses. In: Short FT, Coles R, Eds. Global seagrass research methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedetti-Cecchi L. 2003. The importance of the variance around the mean effect size of ecological processes. Ecology 84:2335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryars S, Collings G, Miller D. 2011. Nutrient exposure cause epiphytic changes and coincident declines in two temperate seagrasses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 441:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkholder JM, Tomasko D, Touchette BW. 2007. Seagrasses and eutrophication. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 350:46–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabaço S, Apostolaki ET, García-Marín P, Gruber R, Hernández I, Martínez-Crego B, Mascaró O, Pérez M, Prathep A, Robinson C, Romero J, Schmidt AL, Short FT, van Tussenbroek BI, Santos R. 2013. Effects of nutrient enrichment on seagrass population dynamics: evidence and synthesis from the biomass–density relationships. J Ecol 101:1552–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cherwin K, Knapp A. 2012. Unexpected patterns of sensitivity to drought in semi-arid grasslands. Oecologia 169:845–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collado-Vides L. 2002. Morphological plasticity of Caulerpa prolifera (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) in relation to growth form in a coral reef lagoon. Bot Mar 45:123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collier CJ, Waycott M, Ospina AG. 2012. Responses of four Indo-West Pacific seagrass species to shading. Mar Pollut Bull 65:342–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Deegan LA, Johnson DS, Warren RS, Peterson BJ, Fleeger JW, Fagherazzi S, Wollheim WM. 2012. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490:388–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Duarte CM, Dennison WC, Orth RJ, Carruthers TJB. 2008. The charisma of coastal ecosystems. Est Coast 31:233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durako MJ, Kunzelman JI, Kenworthy WJ, Hammerstrom KK. 2003. Depth related variability in the photobiology of two populations of Halophila johnsonii and Halophila decipiens. Mar Biol 142:1219–28.Google Scholar
  14. Edgar GJ. 1990. The use of the size structure of benthic macrofaunal communities to estimate faunal biomass and secondary production. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 137:195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Espino F, Tuya F, Brito A, Haroun RJ. 2011. Ichthyofauna associated with Cymodocea nodosa meadows in the Canarian Archipelago (central eastern Atlantic): community structure and nursery role. Cienc Mar 37:157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Figueroa FL, Israel A, Neori A, Martínez B, Malta E, Ang P, Inken S, Marquardt R, Korbee N. 2009. Effects of nutrient supply on photosynthesis and pigmentation in Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta): responses to short-term stress. Aquat Biol 7:173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folin O, Ciocalteu V. 1927. On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. J Biol Chem 12:239–43.Google Scholar
  18. Fourqueran JW, Zieman JC, Powell GVN. 1992. Phosphorus limitation of primary production in Florida Bay: evidence from C:N: P ratios of the dominant seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Limnol Oceanogr 37:162–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Sánchez M, Korbee N, Pérez-Ruzafa M, Marcos C, Domínguez B, Figueroa FL, Pérez-Ruzafa A. 2012. Physiological response and photoacclimation capacity of Caulerpa prolifera (Forsskål) J.V. Lamouroux and Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson meadows in the Mar Menor lagoon (SE Spain). Mar Environ Res 79:37–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gartner A, Tuya F, Lavery PS, McMahon K. 2013. Habitat preferences of macroinvertebrate fauna among seagrasses with varying structural forms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 439:143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gil M, Armitage AR, Fourqurean JW. 2006. Nutrient impacts on epifaunal density and species composition in a subtropical seagrass bed. Hydrobiologia 569:437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goecker ME, Heck KL, Valentine JF. 2005. Effects of nitrogen concentrations in turtlegrass Thalassia testudinum on consumption by the bucktooth parrotfish Sparisoma radians. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 286:239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gómez-Pinchetti JL, del Campo Fernández E, Moreno P, García Reina G. 1998. Nitrogen availability influences the biochemical composition and photosynthesis of tank-cultivated Ulva rigida (Chlorophyta). J Appl Phycol 10:383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grzymski J, Johnsen G, Sakshaug E. 1997. The significance of intracellular self-shading on the bio-optical properties of brown, red and green macroalgae. J Phycol 33:408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heck KL, Valentine JF, Pennock JR, Chaplin G, Spitzer PM. 2006. Effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on shoalgrass Halodule wrightii and its epiphytes: results of a field experiment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 326:145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heck KL, Carruthers TJB, Duarte CM, Hughes AR, Kendrick G, Orth RJ, Williams SW. 2008. Trophic transfers from seagrass meadows subsidize diverse marine and terrestrial consumers. Ecosystems 11:1198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmer M, Marbà N, Lamote M, Duarte CM. 2009. Deterioration of sediment quality in seagrass meadows (Posidonia oceanica) invaded by macroalgae (Caulerpa sp.). Est Coast 32:456–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes AR, Bando KJ, Rodriguez LF, Williams SL. 2004. Relative effects of grazers and nutrients on seagrasses: a meta-analysis approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 282:87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jassby A, Platt T. 1976. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:540–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kinney EL, Valiela I. 2013. Changes in δ15N in salt marsh sediments in a long-term fertilization study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 477:41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapointe BE, Barile PJ, Littler MM, Littler DS. 2005. Macroalgal blooms on southeast Florida coral reefs: II. Cross-shelf discrimination of nitrogen sources indicates widespread assimilation of sewage nitrogen. Harmful Algae 4:1106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leoni V, Vela A, Pasqualini V, Pergent-Martini C, Pergent G. 2008. Effects of experimental reduction of light and nutrient enrichments (N and P) on seagrasses: a review. Aquat Conserv 18:202–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malta EJ, Ferreira DG, Vergara JJ, Pérez-Lloréns JL. 2005. Nitrogen load and irradiance affect morphology, photosynthesis and growth of Caulerpa prolifera (Bryopsidales: Chlorophyta). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maxwell K, Johnson G. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Morris EP, Peralta G, Benavente J, Freitas R, Rodrigues AM, Quintino V, Álvarez O, Valcárcel-Pérez N, Vergara JJ, Hernández I, Pérez-Lloréns JL. 2009. Caulerpa prolifera stable isotope ratios reveal anthropogenic nutrients within a tidal lagoon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 390:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murphy SM, Wimp GM, Lewis D, Denno RF. 2012. Nutrient presses and pulses differentially impact plants, herbivores, detritivores and their natural enemies. PLoS One 7(8):e43929.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Oliva S, Mascaró O, Llagostera I, Pérez M, Romero J. 2012. Selection of metrics based on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and development of a biotic index (CYMOX) for assessing ecological status of coastal and transitional waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 114:7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pérez-Ruzafa A, Marcos C, Bernal CM, Quintino V, Freitas R, Rodrigues AM, Garcia-Sánchez M, Pérez-Ruzafa I. 2012. Cymodocea nodosa vs. Caulerpa prolifera: causes and consequences of a long-term history of interaction in macrophyte meadows in the Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spain, southwestern Mediterranean). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 110:101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raniello R, Mollo E, Lorenti M, Gavagnin M, Buia MC. 2009. Phytotoxic activity of caulerpenyne from the Mediterranean invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa: a potential allelochemicals. Biol Invasions 9:361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritchie R. 2008. Universal chlorophyll equations for estimating chlorophylls a, b, c and d and total chlorophylls in natural assemblages of photosynthetic organisms using acetone, methanol, or ethanol solvents. Photosynthetica 46:115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russell BD, Harley CDG, Wernberg T, Mieszkowska N, Widdicombe S, Hall-Spencer JM, Connell SD. 2012. Predicting ecosystem shifts requires new approaches that integrate the effects of climate change across entire systems. Biol Lett 8:164–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Snyder KA, Tartowski SL. 2006. Multi-scale temporal variation in water availability: implications for vegetation dynamics in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. J Arid Environ 65:219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solomon D, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Amelung W, Lobe I, Pell A, Riha S, Ngoze S, Verchot L, Mbugua D, Skjemstad J, Schafer T. 2007. Long-term impacts of anthropogenic perturbations on dynamics and speciation of organic carbon in tropical forest and subtropical grassland ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 13:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Terrados J, Duarte CM, Kenworthy WJ. 1997. Experimental evidence for apical dominance in the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 148:263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tuya F, Hernández-Zerpa H, Espino F, Haroun RJ. 2013a. Drastic decadal decline of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa at Gran Canaria (Eastern Atlantic): interactions with the green algae Caulerpa prolifera. Aquat Bot 105:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuya F, Viera-Rodríguez MA, Guedes R, Espino F, Haroun R, Terrados J. 2013b. Seagrass responses to nutrient enrichment depend on clonal integration, but not flow-on effects on associated biota. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 490:23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tuya F, Ribeiro-Leite L, Arto-Cuesta N, Coca J, Haroun R, Espino F. 2014a. Decadal changes in the structure of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows: natural vs. human influences. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 137:41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tuya F, Png-Gonzalez L, Riera R, Haroun R, Espino F. 2014b. Ecological structure and function differ between habitats dominated by seagrasses and green seaweeds. Mar Environ Res 98:1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Valentine JF, Heck KL. 2001. The role of leaf nitrogen content in determining turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) grazing by a generalized herbivore in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 258:65–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Waycott M, Duarte C, Carruthers TJB, Orth RJ, Dennison WC, Olyarnik S, Calladine A, Fourqurean JW, Heck K, Hughes AR, Kendrick GA, Kenworthy WJ, Short FT, Williams SL. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12377–12380.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. White KS, Westera MB, Kendrick GA. 2011. Spatial patterns in fish herbivory in a temperate Australian seagrass meadow. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 93:366–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Tuya
    • 1
  • Séfora Betancor
    • 1
  • María A. Viera-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Rayco Guedes
    • 2
  • Rodrigo Riera
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ricardo Haroun
    • 1
  • Fernando Espino
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo en Biodiversidad y Conservación, ECOAQUAUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de QuímicaUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain
  3. 3.Centro de Investigaciones Medioambientales del Atlántico (CIMA SL)S/C de TenerifeSpain
  4. 4.Instituto de PesquisasJardim Botanico do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations