Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon Tradeoffs of Restoration and Provision of Endangered Species Habitat in a Fire-Maintained Forest

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forests are a significant part of the global carbon cycle and are increasingly viewed as tools for mitigating climate change. Natural disturbances, such as fire, can reduce carbon storage. However, many forests and dependent species evolved with frequent fire as an integral ecosystem process. We used a landscape forest simulation model to evaluate the effects of endangered species habitat management on carbon sequestration. We compared unmanaged forests (control) to forests managed with prescribed burning and prescribed burning combined with thinning. Management treatments followed guidelines of the recovery plan for the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW), which requires low-density longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forest. The unmanaged treatment provided the greatest carbon storage, but at the cost of lost RCW habitat. Thinning and burning treatments expanded RCW habitat by increasing the dominance of longleaf pine and reducing forest density, but stored 22% less total ecosystem carbon compared to the control. Our results demonstrate that continued carbon sequestration and the provision of RCW habitat are not incompatible goals, although there is a tradeoff between habitat extent and total ecosystem carbon across the landscape. Management for RCW habitat might also increase ecosystem resilience, as longleaf pine is tolerant of fire and drought, and resistant to pests. Restoring fire-adapted forests requires a reduction in carbon. However, the size of the reduction, the effects on sequestration rates, and the co-benefits from other ecosystem services should be evaluated in the context of the specific forest community targeted for restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birdsey RA. 1992. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. General Technical Report INT-16. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

  • Canadell JG, Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Field CB, Buitenhuis ET, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Gillett NP, Houghton RA, Marland G. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18866–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR. 2008. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen JP, Pacala SW, Jenkins JC, Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR, Birdsey RA. 2000. Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. Forests. Science 290:1148–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Matson PPA. 2011. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangal SRS, Felzer BS, Hurteau MD. 2014. Effects of agriculture and timber harvest on carbon sequestration in the eastern US forests. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1002/2013JG002409.

  • Dilustro JJ, Collins BS, Duncan LK, Sharitz RR. 2002. Soil texture, land-use intensity, and vegetation of Fort Benning upland forest sites. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earles M, North M, Hurteau M. 2014. Wildfire and drought dynamics destabilize carbon stores of fire-suppressed forests. Ecol Appl 24:732–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom RT, Sanders FJ. 1997. Red-cockaded Woodpecker foraging ecology in an old-growth longleaf pine forest. Wilson Bull 109:203–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford CR, McGee J, Scandellari F, Hobbie EA, Mitchell RJ. 2012. Long- and short-term precipitation effects on soil CO2 efflux and total belowground carbon allocation. Agric For Meteorol 156:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam FS, Platt WJ. 1999. Effects of long-term fire exclusion on tree species composition and stand structure in an old-growth Pinus palustris (Longleaf pine) forest. Plant Ecol 140:15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glitzenstein JS, Platt WJ, Streng DR. 1995. Effects of fire regime and habitat on tree dynamics in north Florida longleaf pine savannas. Ecol Monogr 65:441–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Shifley SR, Mladenoff DJ, Nimerfro KK, He HS. 2000. Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Can J For Res 30:32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker TD, Compton JE. 2003. Forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen accumulation during the first century after agricultural abandonment. Ecol Appl 13:299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA. 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B 55:378–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau M, North M. 2009. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Front Ecol Environ 7:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau MD, Brooks ML. 2011. Short- and long-term effects of fire on carbon in us dry temperate forest systems. Bioscience 61:139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau MD, Hungate BA, Koch GW, North MP, Smith GR. 2013. Aligning ecology and markets in the forest carbon cycle. Front Ecol Environ 11:37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau MD, Stoddard MT, Fule PZ. 2011. The carbon costs of mitigating high-severity wildfire in southwestern ponderosa pine. Glob Change Biol 17:1516–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen KH, Butnor JR, Kush JS, Schmidtling RC, Nelson CD. 2009. Hurricane Katrina winds damaged longleaf pine less than loblolly pine. South J Appl For 33:178–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman LK, Coffey KL, Mitchell RJ, Moser EB. 2004. Ground cover recovery patterns and life-history traits: implications for restoration obstacles and opportunities in a species-rich savanna. J Ecol 92:409–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman LK, Mitchell RJ, Helton RC, Drew MB. 2001. Productivity and species richness across an environmental gradient in a fire-dependent ecosystem. Am J Bot 88:2119–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kush JS, Meldahl RS, McMahon CK, Boyer WD. 2004. Longleaf pine: a sustainable approach for increasing terrestrial carbon in the southern United States. Environ Manage 33:S139–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers JL, Vanlear DH, Boyer WD. 1995. The longleaf pine forests of the Southeast—requiem or renaissance. J For 93:39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon PC. 1949. Successional responses of herbs in the longleaf-slash pine forest after fire. Ecology 30:135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DJ, Niu SL, Luo YQ. 2012. Global patterns of the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 195:172–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markewitz D, Sartori F, Craft C. 2002. Soil change and carbon storage in longleaf pine stands planted on marginal agricultural lands. Ecol Appl 12:1276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metherell AK, Harding LA, Cole CV, Parton WJ. 1993. CENTURY soil organic matter model environment technical documentation. Agroecosystem Version 4.0. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-ARS.

  • Mitchell R, Engstrom T, Sharitz RR, De Steven D, Hiers K, Cooper R, Kirkman LK. 2009. Old forests and endangered woodpeckers: old-growth in the southern coastal plain. Nat Areas J 29:301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Kirkman LK, Pecot SD, Wilson CA, Palik BJ, Boring LR. 1999. Patterns and controls of ecosystem function in longleaf pine-wiregrass savannas. I. Aboveground net primary productivity. Can J For Res 29:743–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD. 2008. The demise of fire and “Mesophication” of forests in the eastern United States. Bioscience 58:123–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS. 2013. Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 1 July 2013.

  • Onaindia M, Fernández de Manuel B, Madariaga I, Rodríguez-Loinaz G. 2013. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. For Ecol Manage 289:1–9.

  • Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Chen JM, Birdsey R, McCullough K, He L, Deng F. 2011. Age structure and disturbance legacy of North American forests. Biogeosciences 8:715–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ. 1996. The CENTURY model. In: Powlson D, Smith P, Smith J, Eds. Evaluation of soil organic matter models. Berlin: Springer. p 283–91.

  • Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, Kirchner T, Menaut JC, Seastedt T, Moya EG, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI. 1993. Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:785–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J, Post WM. 1986. Influence of climate, soil-moisture, and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochemistry 2:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298:156–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES. 2004. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob Change Biol 10:2052–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remucal JM, McGee JD, Fehrenbacher MM, Best C, Mitchell RJ. 2013. Application of the climate action reserve’s forest project protocol to a longleaf pine forest under restoration management. J For 111:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restaino JC, Peterson DL. 2013. Wildfire and fuel treatment effects on forest carbon dynamics in the western United States. For Ecol Manage 303:46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400:56–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson LJ, Stokes TA, Butnor JR, Johnsen KH, Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Anderson P, Jackson J, Ferrari L, Martin TA, Cropper Jr WP. 2014. Ecosystem carbon stocks in Pinus palustris forests. Can J For Res (in press).

  • Samuelson LJ, Stokes TA, Johnsen KH. 2012. Ecophysiological comparison of 50-year-old longleaf pine, slash pine and loblolly pine. For Ecol Manage 274:108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson LJ, Whitaker WB. 2012. Relationships between soil CO2 efflux and forest structure in 50-year-old longleaf pine. For Sci 58:472–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ. 2007. Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol Model 201:409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Hua D, Bolstad PV, Birdsey RA, Mladenoff DJ. 2011a. The effects of forest harvest intensity in combination with wind disturbance on carbon dynamics in Lake States Mesic Forests. Ecol Model 222:144–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Van Tuyl S, Clark KL, Hom J, La Puma I. 2011b. Carbon sequestration in the new jersey pine barrens under different scenarios of fire management. Ecosystems 14:987–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman PM, Johnson WC. 1989. Phytomass and detrital carbon storage during forest regrowth in the southeastern United States Piedmont. Can J For Res 19:69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel DS, Braswell BH, Holland EA, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Painter TH, Parton WJ, Townsend AR. 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 8:279–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JH, Burgan RE. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography: 66.

  • Smith P, Smith JU, Powlson DS, McGill WB, Arah JRM, Chertov OG, Coleman K, Franko U, Frolking S, Jenkinson DS, Jensen LS, Kelly RH, Klein-Gunnewiek H, Komarov AS, Li C, Molina JAE, Mueller T, Parton WJ, Thornley JHM, Whitmore AP. 1997. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81:153–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Scheller RM, Miranda BR, Shinneman D, Syphard A. 2009. Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: a process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II. Ecol Model 220:3380–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USFWS. 2003. Recovery plan for the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis): second revision. Atlanta, GA: United States Fish and Wildlife Service. p 296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagner CE, Stocks BJ, Lawson BD, Alexander ME, Lynham TJ, McAlpine RS. 1992. Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behavior prediction system. Ottawa, ON: Fire Danger Group, Forestry Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varner JM, Gordon DR, Putz E, Hiers JK. 2005. Restoring fire to long-unburned Pinus palustris ecosystems: novel fire effects and consequences for long-unburned ecosystems. Restor Ecol 13:536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker J, Peet RK. 1984. Composition and species-diversity of pine-wiregrass savannas of the Green Swamp, North Carolina. Vegetatio 55:163–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West DC, Doyle TW, Tharp ML, Beauchamp JJ, Platt WJ, Downing DJ. 1993. Recent growth increases in old-growth longleaf pine. Can J For Res 23:846–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan A, Mitchell R, Staudhammer C, Starr G. 2013. Cyclic occurrence of fire and its role in carbon dynamics along an edaphic moisture gradient in longleaf pine ecosystems. PLoS One 8(1):e54045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ, Boring LR. 1999. Patterns and controls of ecosystem function in longleaf pine-wiregrass savannas. II. Nitrogen dynamics. Can J For Res 29:752–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SQ, Liu SG, Li ZP, Sohl TL. 2010. Federal land management, carbon sequestration, and climate change in the southeastern us: A case study with Fort Benning. Environ Sci Technol 44:992–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the US Department of Defense’s Strategic Environmental Research Development Program (SERDP). We thank the Ft. Benning field crew for assistance with data collection and James Parker and Rob Addington for providing data and facilitating access to field locations. We are grateful for the constructive feedback from anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine L. Martin.

Additional information

Author Contributions

KLM performed research and analyzed the data; MDH, BAH, GWK, and MPN conceived of and designed the study; KLM, MDH, BAH, GWK, and MPN wrote the paper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, K.L., Hurteau, M.D., Hungate, B.A. et al. Carbon Tradeoffs of Restoration and Provision of Endangered Species Habitat in a Fire-Maintained Forest. Ecosystems 18, 76–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9813-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9813-1

Keywords

Navigation