Skip to main content

Regional-Level Inputs of Emergent Aquatic Insects from Water to Land

Abstract

Emergent aquatic insects can provide inputs to terrestrial ecosystems near lentic and lotic waterbodies, producing ecosystem linkages at the aquatic–terrestrial interface. Although aquatic insect emergence has been examined for individual sites, the magnitude and spatial distribution of this phenomenon has not been examined at regional spatial scales. Here, we characterize this cross-habitat linkage for the state of Wisconsin, USA (169,639 km2). We combined GIS hydrological data with empirical data and predictive models of aquatic insect production to estimate annual aquatic emergence for the state of Wisconsin. Total emergence (lentic + lotic) was estimated to be about 6,800 metric tons of C y−1. Lentic systems comprised 79% of total estimated insect emergence, primarily due to the large amount of lake surface area relative to streams. This is due to both basic ecosystem geometry and the overall abundance of lakes in Wisconsin. Spatial variation was high: insect emergence in southwestern Wisconsin was dominated by streams, whereas for most of the rest of the state insect emergence was dominated by lakes. Lentic inputs to land were highly concentrated (relative to lotic inputs) because lakes have a high ratio of surface area to buffer area. Although less concentrated, the spatial extent of lotic influence was greater: statewide, four times more land area fell within the 100 m buffer zones of streams compared to lakes. Large waterbodies (almost all of which were lakes) were hotspots of insect emergence and input to land. Aquatic insect inputs exceed estimated terrestrial secondary production in 13% of buffer area, and by a factor of 100 or more adjacent to large lakes (>50,000 ha). The model sensitivity analysis showed that the simplifying assumptions and sources of potential error in the input variables had a minor impact on the overall results.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

References

  • Ballinger A, Lake PS. 2006. Energy and nutrient fluxes from rivers and streams into terrestrial food webs. Mar Freshwater Res 57:15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Saunders WC. 2005. Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshw Biol 50:201–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JR, Fausch KD, Baxter CV. 2011. Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders. Oecologia 167:503–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenden TO, Clark RD, Cooper AR, Seelbach PW, Wang L, Aichele SS, Bissell EG, Stewart JS. 2006. A GIS framework for collecting, managing, and analyzing multiscale landscape variables across large regions for river conservation and management. In: Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW (eds.) Influences of landscapes on stream habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 48, Bethesda, Maryland, p. 49–74.

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman JW, Lillesand TM, Schmaltz JE, Leale JE, Nordheim MJ. 2004. Mapping lake water clarity with Landsat images in Wisconsin, USA. Can J Remote Sens 30:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer J, Hoekman D, Gratton C. 2012. Lake-derived midges increase abundance of shoreline terrestrial arthropods. Oikos 121:252–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epanchin PN, Knapp RA, Lawler SP. 2010. Nonnative trout impact an alpine-nesting bird by altering aquatic-insect subsidies. Ecology 91:2406–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay JC, Vredenburg VT. 2007. Introduced trout sever trophic connections in watersheds: consequences for a declining amphibian. Ecology 88:2187–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladyshev MI, Arts MT, Sushchik NN. 2009. Preliminary estimates of the export of omega-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids (EPA + DHA) from aquatic to terrestrial ecosystems. In: Kainz M, Brett MT, Arts MT, Eds. Lipids in aquatic ecosystems. New York: Springer. p. 179–210.

  • Gratton C, Donaldson J, Vander Zanden MJ. 2008. Ecosystem linkages between lakes and the surrounding terrestrial landscape in northeast Iceland. Ecosystems 11:764–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton C, Vander Zanden MJ. 2009. Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems. Ecology 90:2689–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greig HS, Kratina P, Thompson PL, Palen WJ, Richardson JS, Shurin JB. 2012. Warming, eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 18:504–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman D, Bartrons M, Gratton C. 2012. Ecosystem linkages revealed by experimental lake-derived isotope signal in heathland food webs. Oecologia 170:735–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman D, Dreyer J, Jackson RD, Townsend PA, Gratton C. 2011. Lake to land subsidies: experimental addition of aquatic insects increases terrestrial arthropod densities. Ecology 92:2063–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN. 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen Int Verein Limnol 19:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Wardle DA. 2009. The influence of freshwater-lake subsidies on invertebrates occupying terrestrial vegetation. Acta Oecol 35:698–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroux S, Loreau M. 2012. Dynamics of reciprocal pulsed subsidies in local and meta-ecosystems. Ecosystems 15:48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J, Zorn T, Stewart J, Seelbach P, Wehrly K, Wang L. 2009. Defining and characterizing cool water streams and their fish assemblages in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA. N Am J Fish Manage 29:1130–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdade LS, Rodewald PG, Hatch KA. 2011. Contribution of emergent aquatic insects to refueling in spring migrant songbirds. Auk 128:127–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson JK, Kratz K, Benson BJ. 2006. Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape: long-term ecological research on North temperate lakes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Oesterheld M, Frank DA, Williams KJ. 1989. Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM, Fastie CL, Chapin FS, Engstrom DR, Sharman LC. 2007. Interactions and linkages among ecosystems during landscape evolution. Bioscience 57:237–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano S, Murakami M. 2001. Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:166–70.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MC. 1993. Regression analysis of log-transformed data: statistical bias and its correction. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik JM. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod SJ, Tyler SJ. 1991. Exploitation of prey by a river bird, the dipper Cinclus cinclus (L.), along acidic and circumneutral streams in upland Wales. Freshwater Biol 25:105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML. 2004. Whole-lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic food webs. Nature 427:240–3.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold A, Smith M, Warren PH, Maltby L. 2011. Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations. Ecology 92:1711–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen I, Masters Z, Hildrew AG, Ormerod SJ. 2004. Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use. J Appl Ecol 41:934–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR. 2004. Food webs at the landscape scale. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DM, Graczyk DJ, Garrison PJ, Wang L, LaLiberte G, Bannerman R. 2006. Nutrient concentrations and their relations to the biotic integrity of wadeable streams in Wisconsin. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1722, Middleton, Wisconsin, USA.

  • Rothery P. 1988. A cautionary note on data transformation: bias in back-transformed means. Bird Study 35:219–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, Zhao MS, Reeves M, Hashimoto H. 2004. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54:547–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto G, Iwata T, Murakami M. 2002. Seasonal subsidy stabilizes food web dynamics: balance in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecol Res 17:433–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden M, Gratton C. 2011. Blowin in the wind: reciprocal airborne carbon fluxes between lakes and land. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:170–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WDNR. 2011. Online document. http://dnr.wi.gov/maps/gis/datahydro.html. Madison, WI, USA.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Stephenson and S. Januchowski-Hartley for ArcGIS help, and J. Van derVolgen and E. Krznarich for library assistance. We also appreciate valuable discussions with E.H. Stanley, A.R. Ives, A. C. Benke, B. Leung, C. Chivers, D. Hoekman and A. L. Rypel. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (DEB-0717148), a Guyer Postdoctoral Fellowship to M. Bartrons, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Graduate School, and a postdoctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education to M. Bartrons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mireia Bartrons.

Additional information

Author Contributions

M.B., J.V.Z., and C.G.: conceived of or designed the study; M.B.: performed research; M.B.: analyzed data, M.P. and M.W.D.: contributed new methods or models; M.B.: led the writing with contribution from all co-authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 58 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 761 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartrons, M., Papeş, M., Diebel, M.W. et al. Regional-Level Inputs of Emergent Aquatic Insects from Water to Land. Ecosystems 16, 1353–1363 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9688-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9688-6

Keywords

  • aquatic insects
  • emergence
  • lentic
  • lotic
  • lakes
  • streams
  • landscape
  • terrestrial–aquatic linkages
  • food webs
  • Wisconsin