Skip to main content

Riparian Ecosystems in the 21st Century: Hotspots for Climate Change Adaptation?

Abstract

Riparian ecosystems in the 21st century are likely to play a critical role in determining the vulnerability of natural and human systems to climate change, and in influencing the capacity of these systems to adapt. Some authors have suggested that riparian ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts due to their high levels of exposure and sensitivity to climatic stimuli, and their history of degradation. Others have highlighted the probable resilience of riparian ecosystems to climate change as a result of their evolution under high levels of climatic and environmental variability. We synthesize current knowledge of the vulnerability of riparian ecosystems to climate change by assessing the potential exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of their key components and processes, as well as ecosystem functions, goods and services, to projected global climatic changes. We review key pathways for ecological and human adaptation for the maintenance, restoration and enhancement of riparian ecosystem functions, goods and services and present emerging principles for planned adaptation. Our synthesis suggests that, in the absence of adaptation, riparian ecosystems are likely to be highly vulnerable to climate change impacts. However, given the critical role of riparian ecosystem functions in landscapes, as well as the strong links between riparian ecosystems and human well-being, considerable means, motives and opportunities for strategically planned adaptation to climate change also exist. The need for planned adaptation of and for riparian ecosystems is likely to be strengthened as the importance of many riparian ecosystem functions, goods and services will grow under a changing climate. Consequently, riparian ecosystems are likely to become adaptation ‘hotspots’ as the century unfolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1

References

  • Arnell NW. 1999. The effect of climate change on hydrological regimes in Europe: a continental prospective. Global Environ Change 9:5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore P, Church M. 2001. The impact of climate change on rivers and river processes in Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 555.

  • Ballinger A, Lake PS. 2006. Energy and nutrient fluxes from rivers and streams into terrestrial food webs. Mar Freshw Res 57:15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JA, O’Neill S. 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environ Change 20:211–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP, Eds. 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, 210 pp.

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SS, Lake PS. 2007. River restoration in Victoria, Australia: change is in the wind, and none too soon. Restor Ecol 15:584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosofske KD, Chen J, Naiman RJ, Franklin JF. 1997. Harvesting effects on microclimatic gradients from small streams to uplands in western Washington. Ecol Appl 7:118–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Davies PM, Mosisch TD. 1999. Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradation. Freshw Biol 41:333–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Cowan T. 2008. Evidence of impacts from rising temperature on inflows to the Murray-Darling Basin. Geophys Res Lett 35:LO7701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Stafford-Smith DM. 2000. A synthesis of recent global change research on pasture and rangeland production: reduced uncertainties and their management implications. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capon SJ. 2003. Plant community responses to wetting and drying in a large arid floodplain. River Res Appl 19:509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catford JA, Naiman RJ, Chambers LE, Roberts J, Douglas M, Davies P. 2012. Predicting novel riparian ecosystems in a changing climate. Ecosystems . doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9566-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers LE, Hughes L, Weston MA. 2005. Climate change and its impact on Australia’s avifauna. Emu 105:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AR, Mac Nally R, Bond N, Lake PS. 2008. Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshw Biol 53:1707–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessy MS. 2001. Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Lewis Publisher. 462 pp.

  • Danehy RJ, Kirpes BJ. 2000. Relative humidity gradients across riparian areas in eastern Oregon and Washington forests. Northwest Science 74:224–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies PM. 2010. Climate change implications for river restoration in global biodiversity hotspots. Restor Ecol 18:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni W, Sukhiga BS. 2008. Climate change and groundwater: a short review. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 288:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwire KA, Kauffman JB. 2003. Fire and riparian ecosystems in landscapes of the western USA. For Ecol Manage 178:61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favis-Mortlock DR, Guerra AJT. 1999. The implications of general circulation model estimates of rainfall for future erosion: a case study from Brazil. Catena 37:329–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, McDonal N, Mac Nally R, Murphy DD, Walters J, Floyd T. 2003. Effects of floristics, physiognomy, and non-native vegetation on riparian bird communities in a Mojave Desert watershed. J Anim Ecol 72:484–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Smit B, Wandel J. 2006. Vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: a case study from Arctic Bay, Canada. Global Environ Change 16:145–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Lock MA, Reynolds B. 1993. Climatic change and the release of immobilized nutrients from Welsh riparian wetland soils. Ecol Eng 2:367–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, McDonald-Madden E, Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Granthan HS, Watson JEM, Klein CJ, Green DC, Possingham HP. 2010. Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466:365–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H, Klein RJT. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75:301–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssell H. 2007. Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment, approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH. 2003. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st Century. Science 302:1524–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie AS. 2006. Global warming and fluvial geomorphology. Geomorphology 79:384–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady KC, Ferrier SM, Kolb TE, Hart SC, Allan GJ, Whitham TG. 2011. Genetic variation in productivity of foundation riparian species at the edge of their distribution: implications for restoration and assisted migration in a warming world. Glob Change Biol 17:3724–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory SV, Swanson W, McKee WA, Cummins KW. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41:540–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero AM, Knight AT, Grantham HS, Cowling RM, Wilson KA. 2010. Predicting willingness-to-sell and its utility for assessing conservation opportunity for expanding protected area networks. Conserv Lett 3:332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S. 2009. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environ Change 19:240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LJ, Hoffman JR. 2011. Climate savvy: adapting conservation and resource management to a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfield JM, Naiman RJ. 2001. Effects of salmon-derived nitrogen on riparian forest growth and implications for stream productivity. Ecology 82:2403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton JL, Clark JL. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. For Ecol Manage 140:239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes FMR, Adams WM, Stroh PA. 2012. When is open-endedness desirable in restoration projects? Restor Ecol 20:291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE. 2005. Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of a global threat? J Appl Ecol 42:784–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupp CR, Osterkamp WR. 1996. Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology 14:277–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins MG, Johnson AC, Deflandre-Vlandas A, Comber S, Posen P, Boorman D. 2010. Which offers more scope to suppress river phytoplankton blooms: reducing nutrient pollution or riparian shading? Sci Total Environ 408:5065–77.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2001. Third Assessment Report (TAR). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

  • IPCC. 2007a. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Working Group II: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AKL, Ebert SP, Murray AE. 1999. Distribution of coastal freshwater wetlands and riparian forests in the Herbert River catchment and implications for management of catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Environ Conserv 26:229–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Chiew FHS, Boughton WC, Zhang L. 2006. Estimating the sensitivity of mean annual runoff to climate change using selected hydrological models. Adv Water Resour 29:1419–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 106:110–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford RT, Norman FI. 2002. Australian waterbirds—products of the continent’s ecology. Emu 102:47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford R, Biggs H, Pollard S. 2011. Strategic adaptive management in freshwater protected areas and their rivers. Biol Conserv 144:1194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS, Thomson JR, Lada H, Mac Nally R, Reid D, Stanaway J, Taylor AC. 2010. Diversity and distribution of macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia. Divers Distrib 16:713–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapp S, Byrne J, Townshend I, Kienzle S. 2005. Climate warming impacts on snowpack accumulation in an alpine watershed. Int J Climatol 25:521–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard L, Pelling M. 2010. Civil society response to industrial contamination of groundwater in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 22:579–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R, Soderquist TR, Tzaros C. 2000. The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia. Biol Conserv 93:293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R, Cunningham SC, Baker PJ, Horner GJ, Thomson JR. 2011. Dynamics of Murray-Darling floodplain forests under multiple stressors: the past, present, and future of an Australian icon. Water Resour Res 47:W00G05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA. 2010. Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries. Global Environ Change: Human Policy Dimens 20:36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Fenton DM, Marshall PA, Sutton SG. 2007. How resource-dependency can influence social resilience within a primary resource industry. Rural Sociol 72:359–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press. pp. 1–64.

  • Moradkhani H, Baird RG, Wherry SA. 2010. Assessment of climate change impact on floodplain and hydrologic ecotones. J Hydrol 395:264–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H, McClain ME. 2005. Riparia: ecology, conservation and management of streamside communities. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjar RG. 1999. The water balance of the Susquehanna River Basin and its response to climate change. J Hydrol 219:7–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nanson GC, Tooth S. 1999. Arid-zone rivers as indicators of climate change. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction in arid lands. New Delhi and Calcutta: Oxford and IBH. pp 75–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA. 2001. Potential changes in rainfall erosivity in the U.S. with climate change during the 21st century. J Soil Water Conserv 56:229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O’Neal MR. 2004. Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review. J Soil Water Conserv 59:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DR. 2010. Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 2(1):113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DL, Brock MA. 2009. Modified water régime and salinity as a consequence of climate change: prospects for wetlands of Southern Australia. Clim Change 95:523–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Svedmark M. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environ Manage 30:468–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Gardfjell M, Grelsson G. 1991. Importance of hydrochory in structuring plant communities along rivers. Can J Bot 69:2631–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Jansson R, Kuglerová L, Lind L, Ström L. 2012. Boreal riparian vegetation under climate change. Ecosystems. doi:10/1007/s10021-012-9622-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C. 2007. Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21:49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Allan JD, Meyer J, Bernhardt ES. 2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: data and experimentally knowledge to inform future efforts. Restor Ecol 15:472–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Reidy Liermann CA, Nilsson C, Flörke M, Alcamo J, Lake PS, Bond N. 2008. Climate change and the world’s river basins: anticipating management options. Front Ecol Environ 6:81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Lettenmaier DP, Poff NL, Postel SL, Richter B, Warner R. 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environ Manage 44:1053–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ. 2008. Public benefits, private benefits, and policy intervention for land-use change for environmental benefits. Land Economics 84:225–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry LG, Andersen DC, Reynolds LV, Mark Nelson S, Shafroth PB. 2012. Vulnerability of riparian ecosystems to elevated CO2 and climate change in arid and semiarid western North America. Glob Change Biol 18:821–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J. 2009. Lessons for climate change adaptation from better management of rivers. Clim Dev 1:194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Finlayson CM. 2011. Australia’s Murray Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Mar Freshw Res 62:232–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Hartmann J. 2011. Taking a second look: climate change, periodic re-licensing and better management of old dams. Mar Freshw Res 62:312–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Lankford BA. 2010. Environmental water requirements: demand management in an era of water scarcity. J Integr Environ Sci 7:75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Finlayson CM, Howitt JA. 2012. Beguiling and risk: “environmental works and measures” for wetlands conservation under a changing climate. Hydrobiologia . doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1292-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55:194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power MD, Sun A, Parker M, Ietrich WE, Wootton JT. 1995. Hydraulic food-chain models: an approach to the study of food-web dynamics in large rivers. Bioscience 45:159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raulings E, Morris K, Thompson R, Mac Nally R. 2011. Do birds of a feather disperse plants together? Freshw Biol 56:1390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, Pysek P, Hobbs RJ. 2007. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib 13:126–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rood SB, Pan J, Gill KM, Franks CG, Samuelson GM, Shepherd A. 2008. Declining summer flows of Rocky Mountain rivers: changing seasonal hydrology and probable impacts on floodplain forests. J Hydrol 349:397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabo JL, Sponseller R, Dixon M, Gade K, Harms T, Heffernan J, Jani A, Katz G, Soykan C, Watts J, Welter J. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more species. Ecology 86:56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scibek J, Allen DM, Cannon AJ, Whitfield PH. 2007. Ground-water-surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. J Hydrol 333:165–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seavy NE, Gardali T, Golet GH, Griggs FT, Howell CA, Kelsey R, Small SL, Viers JH, Weigana JF. 2009. Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: recommendations for practice and research. Ecol Restor 27:330–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA. 2011. Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4:326–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiklomanov IA. 1999. Climate change, hydrology and water resources: the work of the IPCC, 1988–1994. In: van Dam JC, Ed. Impacts of climate change and climate variability on hydrological regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley E, Doyle MW. 2003. Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Front Ecol Environ 1:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitchin R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M, Werner PA. 2009. Australia’s biodiversity and climate change. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg J, Beuchamp VB, Dixon MD, Lite SJ, Paradzick C. 2007. Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid south-western United States. Freshw Biol 52:651–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, McNulty SG, Moore J, Bunch C, Ni J. 2002. Potential impacts of climate change on rainfall erosivity and water availability in China in the next 100 years. International Soil Conservation Conference, Beijing, China, May 2002.

  • Ten Brink P. 2009. TEEB—the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers—summary: responding to the value of nature. Wesseling: Welzel + Hardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JR, Bond NR, Cunningham SC, Metzeling L, Reich P, Thompson RM, MacNally R. 2012. The influence of climatic variation and vegetation on stream biota: lessons from the Big Dry in southeastern Australia. Glob Change Biol 18:1582–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Stanford JA. 2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton S. 2012. Securing landscape resilience to tropical cyclones in Australia’s Wet tropics under a changing climate: lessons from cyclones Larry (and Yasi). Geogr Res 50:15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicuna S, Dracup JA. 2007. The evolution of climate change impact studies on hydrology and water resources in California. Clim Change 82:327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser ME. 2008. Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 275:649–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy Liermann C, Davies PM. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JT, Geron CD, Vose JM, Swank WT. 2002. Nitrogen trace gas emissions from a riparian ecosystem in southern Appalachia. Chemosphere 49:1389–98.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Orr H, Watts G, Battarbee RW, Berry PM, Chadd R, Dugdale SJ, Dubar MJ, Elliott JA, Extence C, Hannah DM, Holmes N, Johnson AC, Knights B, Milner NJ, Ormerod SJ, Solomon D, Timlett R, Whitehead PJ, Wood PJ. 2010. Evidence needed to manage freshwater ecosystems in a changing climate: turning adaptation principles into practice. Sci Total Environ 408:4150–64.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T, Musiake K. 2003. Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrol Process 17:2913–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha J. Capon.

Additional information

Author Contributions

SC: lead author, conceived study, performed research, contributed new models, wrote paper. LC: conceived study, performed research, contributed new models, wrote paper. RM: contributed new models, wrote paper. RN: contributed new models, wrote paper. PD: contributed new models, wrote paper. NM: performed research, wrote paper. JP: performed research, contributed new models, wrote paper. MR: performed research, contributed new models, wrote paper. TC: contributed new models, wrote paper. MD: performed research, wrote paper. JC: performed research, wrote paper. DB: performed research, contributed new models, wrote paper. MS: performed research, wrote paper. JR: performed research, wrote paper. MP: performed research, wrote paper. SW: conceived study, performed research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capon, S.J., Chambers, L.E., Mac Nally, R. et al. Riparian Ecosystems in the 21st Century: Hotspots for Climate Change Adaptation?. Ecosystems 16, 359–381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9656-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9656-1

Keywords

  • adaptive capacity
  • ecosystem services
  • environmental management
  • floodplains
  • human adaptation
  • vulnerability
  • water resources