Soil–Litter Mixing Accelerates Decomposition in a Chihuahuan Desert Grassland
- 912 Downloads
Decomposition models typically under-predict decomposition relative to observed rates in drylands. This discrepancy indicates a significant gap in our mechanistic understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in these systems. Recent research suggests that certain drivers of decomposition that are often not explicitly incorporated into models (for example, photodegradation and soil–litter mixing; SLM) may be important in drylands, and their exclusion may, in part, be responsible for model under-predictions. To assess the role of SLM, litterbags were deployed in the Chihuahuan Desert and interrelationships between vegetation structure, SLM, and rates of decomposition were quantified. Vegetation structure was manipulated to simulate losses of grass cover from livestock grazing and shrub encroachment. We hypothesized that reductions in grass cover would promote SLM and accelerate mass loss by improving conditions for microbial decomposition. Litter mass decreased exponentially, with the greatest losses occurring in concert with summer monsoons. There were no differences in decay constants among grass cover treatments. A significant, positive relationship between mass loss and SLM was observed, but contrary to expectations SLM was independent of grass cover. This suggests that processes operating at finer spatial scales than those in our grass removal treatments were influencing SLM. Shifts in litter lipid composition suggest increased bacterial contribution to decomposition through time. SLM, which is seldom included as a variable controlling decomposition in statistical or mechanistic models, was a strong driver of decomposition. Results are discussed in the context of other known drivers of decomposition in drylands (for example, UV radiation and climate) and more mesic systems.
Keywordsarid carbon cycle dryland dust erosion livestock grazing shrub encroachment phospholipid fatty acids Prosopis
- Asner G, Archer S. 2010. Livestock and the global carbon cycle. In: Steinfeld HMH, Schneider F, Neville LE, Eds. Livestock in a changing landscape: volume 1. Drivers, consequences and responses. Washington, DC: Island Press. p 69–82.Google Scholar
- Bahre CJ, Shelton ML. 1996. Rangeland destruction: cattle and drought in southeastern Arizona at the turn of the century. Journal of the Southwest 38:1–22.Google Scholar
- Berg B, Laskowski R, Bjorn B, Ryszard L. 2005. Changes in substrate composition and rate-regulating factors during decomposition. Advances in Ecological Research. Waltham, MA: Academic Press. pp 101–55.Google Scholar
- Bergametti G, Gillette DA. 2010. Aeolian sediment fluxes measured over various plant/soil complexes in the Chihuahuan Desert. J Geophys Res 115. doi:10.1029/2009jf001543.
- Dobbs FC, Findlay RH. 1993. Analysis of microbial lipids to determine biomass and detect the response of sedimentary microorganisms to disturbance. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ, Eds. Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers. p 347–58.Google Scholar
- Findlay RH, Dobbs FC. 1993. Quantitative description of microbial communities using lipid analysis. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ, Eds. Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers. p 271–84.Google Scholar
- Gillette DA, Pitchford AM. 2004. Sand flux in the northern Chihuahuan desert, New Mexico, USA, and the influence of mesquite-dominated landscapes. J Geophys Res 109. doi:10.1029/2003jf000031.
- Harmon ME, Nadelhoffer KJ, Blair JM. 1999. Measuring decomposition, nutrient turnover, and stores in plant litter. In: Robrtson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P, Eds. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press. p 202–40.Google Scholar
- Helm PJ, Breed CS. 1999. Instrumented field studies of sediment transport by wind. In: Breed CS, Reheis MC, Eds. Desert winds: monitoring wind-related surface processes in Arizona, New Mexico and California. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1598. Washington (DC): US Geological Survey. pp. 31–51.Google Scholar
- King J, Brandt L, Adair E. 2012. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 1–25.Google Scholar
- MEA. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: desertification synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
- Monger HC. 2006. Soil development in the Jornada Basin. In: Havstad KM, Huenneke LF, Schlesinger WH, Eds. Structure and function of a Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem: the Jornada Basin long-term ecological research site. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p 81–106.Google Scholar
- Okin GS. 2005. Dependence of wind erosion and dust emission on surface heterogeneity: stochastic modeling. J Geophys Res 110. doi:10.1029/2004jd005288.
- Okin GS. 2008. A new model of wind erosion in the presence of vegetation. J Geophys Res 113. doi:10.1029/2007jf000758.
- Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF, Turner BLII, Mortimore M, Batterbury SPJ, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernandez RJ, Herrick JE, Huber-Sannwald E, Jiang H, Leemans R, Lynam T, Maestre FT, Ayarza M, Walker B. 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sasser M. 1990. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc.Google Scholar
- Turner BLI, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyers WB. 1990. The earth as transformed by human action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wainwright J. 2006. Climate and climatological variations in the Jornada Basin. In: Havstad K, Huenneke LF, Schlesinger W, Eds. Structure and function of a Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Oxford: New York, NY. p 44–80.Google Scholar
- Whitford WG. 2002. Ecology of desert systems. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar