Abstract
Management efforts to promote forest resiliency as climate changes have often used historical forest structure and composition to provide general guidance for fuels reduction and forest restoration treatments. However, it has been difficult to identify what stand conditions might be fire and drought resilient because historical data and reconstruction studies are generally limited to accurate estimates only of large, live tree density and composition. Other stand features such as smaller tree densities, dead wood, understory structure, regeneration, and fuel loads have been difficult to quantify, estimate how they may vary across a landscape, or assess how they would be affected by fire under current climate conditions. We sampled old-growth, mixed-conifer forests with at least two low-intensity fires within the last 65 years in 150 plots at 48 sample sites ranging over 400 km of the Sierra Nevada. Recent fire history had the strongest influence on understory conditions with small tree density decreasing and shrub cover increasing with the increased intensity and frequency of fire associated with upper-slope and ridge-top locations. In contrast, stand structures associated with large, overstory trees such as total basal area, canopy cover, and the abundance of large snags and logs increased in topographic locations associated with more mesic, productive sites regardless of fire history. In forests with restored fire regimes, topography, fire and their interaction influence productivity and burn intensity, creating the structural heterogeneity characteristic of frequent-fire forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abella SR, Denton CW. 2009. Spatial variation in reference conditions: historical tree density and pattern on a Pinus ponderosa landscape. Can J For Res 39:2391–403.
Agee JK, Skinner CN. 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manage 211:83–96.
Andrews P, Rothermel R. 1982. Charts for interpreting wildland fire behavior characteristics. General Technical Report INT-131. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
Beaty RM, Taylor AH. 2001. Spatial and temporal variation of fire regimes in a mixed conifer forest landscape, Southern Cascades, California, USA. J Biogeogr 28:955–66.
Beaty RM, Taylor AH. 2007. Fire disturbance and forest structure in old-growth mixed conifer forests in the northern Sierra Nevada, California. J Veg Sci 18:879–90.
Beedy EC. 1981. Bird communities and forest structure in the Sierra Nevada of California. Condor 83:97–105.
Bekker MF, Taylor AH. 2001. Gradient analysis of fire regimes in Montane Forests of the Southern Cascade Range, Thousand Lakes Wilderness, California, USA. Plant Ecol 155:15–28.
Brown JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. General Technical Report INT-16. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Ogden, Utah: Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. p 24.
Brown PM, Wu R. 2005. Climate and disturbance forcing of episodic tree recruitment in a southwestern ponderosa pine landscape. Ecology 86:3030–8.
Canadell JG, Raupach MR. 2008. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–7.
Collins BM, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL. 2007. Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Landscape Ecol 22:545–57.
Collins BM, Everett RG, Stephens SL. 2011. Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecosphere 2:art51.
Coppeto SA, Kelt DA, Van Vuren DH, Wilson JA, Bigelow S. 2006. Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada. J Mammal 87:402–13.
ESRI. 2008. ArcGIS version 9.3. ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA.
FAO. 2005. Global forest resource assessment. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Ferrell GT, Otrosina WJ, Demars CJ Jr. 1994. Predicting susceptibility of white fir during a drought-associated outbreak of the fir engraver, Scolytusventralis, in California. Can J For Res 24:302–5.
Franklin JF, Fites-Kaufmann JA. 1996. Assessment of late-successional forests of the Sierra Nevada. Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, Davis. pp 627–62.
Fulé PZ. 2008. Does it make sense to restore wildland fire in changing climate? Restor Ecol 16:526–31.
Gray AN, Zald HSJ, Kern RA, North M. 2005. Stand conditions associated with tree regeneration in Sierran mixed-conifer forests. Forest Sci 51:198–210.
Hessburg P, Salter R, James K. 2007. Re-examining fire severity relations in pre-management era mixed conifer forests: inferences from landscape patterns of forest structure. Landscape Ecol 22:5–24.
Hurteau M, Zald H, North M. 2007. Species-specific response to climate reconstruction in upper-elevation mixed-conifer forests of the western Sierra Nevada, California. Can J For Res 37:1681–91.
Insightful Corporation. 2007. S-PLUS. Seattle, WA, USA.
Kauffman JB, Martin RE. 1990. Sprouting shrub response to different seasons and fuel consumption levels of prescribed fire in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer ecosystems. Forest Sci 36:748–64.
Keane RE, Hessburg PF, Landres PB, Swanson FJ. 2009. The use of historical range and variability (HRV) in landscape management. For Ecol Manage 258:1025–37.
Keeley JE. 2009. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18:116–26.
Laughlin DC, Bakker JD, Stoddard MT, Daniels ML, Springer JD, Gildar CN, Green AM, Covington WW. 2004. Toward reference conditions: wildfire effects on flora in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. For Ecol Manage 199:137–52.
Levene H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, Ed. Stanford studies in mathematics and statistics. Palo Alto (CA): Stanford University Press. p 278–92.
Maser C, Trappe JM. 1984. The seen and unseen world of the fallen tree. In: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 56.
McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software Design.
McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software.
Meyer MD, North MP, Gray AN, Zald HSJ. 2007. Influence of soil thickness on stand characteristics in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Plant Soil 294:113–23.
Millar CI, Woolfenden WB. 1999. The role of climate change in interpreting historical variability. Ecol Appl 9:1207–16.
Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–51.
Miller JD, Thode AE. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens Environ 109:66–80.
Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE. 2009. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16–32.
Morrison ML, Raphael MG. 1993. Modeling the dynamics of snags. Ecol Appl 3:322–30.
Nagel TA, Taylor AH. 2005. Fire and persistence of montane chaparral in mixed conifer forest landscapes in the northern Sierra Nevada, Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:442–57.
Nesmith JCB, Caprio AC, Pfaff AH, McGinnis TW, Keeley JE. 2011. A comparison of effects from prescribed fires and wildfires managed for resource objectives in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. For Ecol Manage 261:1275–82.
North M, Innes J, Zald H. 2007. Comparison of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions. Can J For Res 37:331–42.
North M, Stine P, Zielinski W, Stephens S. 2009. An ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests General Technical Report. PSW-GTR-220. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
Parker AJ. 1982. The topographic relative moisture index: an approach to soil-moisture assessment in mountain terrain. Phys Geogr 3:160–8.
Sakai HF, Noon BR. 1993. Dusky-footed woodrat abundance in different-aged forests in Northwestern California. J Wildl Manag 57:373–82.
Sala A, Peters GD, McIntyre LR, Harrington MG. 2005. Physiological responses of ponderosa pine in western Montana to thinning, prescribed fire and burning season. Tree Physiol 25:339–48.
SAS Institute. 2008. Cary, NC, USA.
Scholl AE, Taylor AH. 2010. Fire regimes, forest change, and self-organization in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest, Yosemite National Park, USA. Ecol Appl 20:362–80.
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611.
Siegel RB, DeSante DF. 2003. Bird communities in thinned versus unthinned Sierran Mixed Conifer Stands. Wilson Bull 115:155–65.
Skinner CN, Chang C. 1996. Fire regimes, past and present. Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis. pp 1041–69.
SNFPA. 2004. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment: final environmental impact statement. In: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Vallejo, CA, USA.
Stephens SL, Fule PZ. 2005. Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: possible reference sites for management. J Forest 103:357–62.
Stephens SL, Skinner CN, Gill SJ. 2003. Dendrochronology-based fire history of Jeffrey pine—mixed conifer forests in the Sierra San Pedro Martir, Mexico. Can J For Res 33:1090–101.
Stephens SL, Fry DL, Franco-Vizcaino E. 2008. Wildfire and spatial patterns in forests in Northwestern Mexico: the United States wishes it had similar fire problems. Ecol Soc 13:12.
Stephens SL, Millar CI, Collins BM. 2010. Operational approaches to managing forests of the future in Mediterranean regions within a context of changing climates. Environ Res Lett 5:9.
Stephenson NL. 1999. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecol Appl 9:1253–65.
Taylor AH. 2010. Fire disturbance and forest structure in an old-growth Pinus ponderosa forest, southern Cascades, USA. J Veg Sci 21:561–72.
Taylor AH, Skinner CN. 2003. Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath Mountains. Ecol Appl 13:704–19.
Underwood EC, Viers JH, Quinn JF, North M. 2010. Using topography to meet wildlife and fuels treatment objectives in fire-suppressed landscapes. Environ Manage 46:809–19.
Urban DL, Miller C, Halpin PN, Stephenson NL. 2000. Forest gradient response in Sierran landscapes: the physical template. Landscape Ecol 15:603–20.
van Mantgem PJ, Schwilk DW. 2009. Negligible influence of spatial autocorrelation in the assessment of fire effects in a mixed conifer forest. Fire Ecol 5:116–25.
van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL. 2007. Apparent climatically induced increase of tree mortality rates in a temperate forest. Ecol Lett 10:909–16.
van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Byrne JC, Daniels LD, Franklin JF, Fule PZ, Harmon ME, Larson AJ, Smith JM, Taylor AH, Veblen TT. 2009. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the Western United States. Science 323:521–4.
van Wagtendonk JW. 2007. The history and evolution of wildland fire use. Fire Ecol 3:3–17.
Virah-Sawmy M, Gillson L, Willis KJ. 2009. How does spatial heterogeneity influence resilience to climatic changes? Ecological dynamics in southeast Madagascar. Ecol Monogr 79:557–74.
Webster KM, Halpern CB. 2010. Long-term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ecosphere 1:art9.
Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–3.
Zar JH. 2010. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
Zou CB, Breshears DD, Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Gard MO. 2008. Soil water dynamics under low-versus high-ponderosa pine tree density: ecohydrological functioning and restoration implications. Ecohydrology 1:309–15.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Cristin Walters for tireless field assistance; Tony Caprio (Sequoia/Kings Canyon N.P.), Jan van Wagtendonk (Yosemite N.P.), and Ross Gerrard (USFS) for help identifying sample sites; Neil Willits for statistical advice, and the USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station for financial support. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions were very helpful in improving the clarity of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Contributions
JL designed study, performed research, analyzed data and wrote the paper. MN conceived of and designed study, analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lydersen, J., North, M. Topographic Variation in Structure of Mixed-Conifer Forests Under an Active-Fire Regime. Ecosystems 15, 1134–1146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9573-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9573-8