The Water Quality Consequences of Restoring Wetland Hydrology to a Large Agricultural Watershed in the Southeastern Coastal Plain
- 767 Downloads
To ameliorate local and coastal eutrophication, management agencies are increasingly turning to wetland restoration. A large portion of restoration is occurring in areas that were drained for agriculture. To recover wetland function these areas must be reflooded and disturbances to soils, including high nutrient content due to past fertilizer use, loss of organic matter and soil compaction, must be reversed. Here, we quantified nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) retention and transformation in a unique large-scale (440 ha) restored wetland in the North Carolina coastal plain, the Timberlake Restoration Project (TLRP). For 2 years following restoration, we quantified water and nutrient budgets for this former agricultural field. We anticipated that TLRP would export high concentrations of inorganic P immediately following reflooding, while retaining or transforming inorganic N. In the first 2 years after a return to the precipitation and wind-driven hydrology, TLRP retained or transformed 97% of NO3–N, 32% of TDN, 25% of NH4–N, and 53% of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) delivered from inflows and precipitation, while exporting 20% more dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and 13% more total P (inorganic, organic, and particulate P) than inputs. Areal mass retention rates of N and P at TLRP were low compared to other restored wetlands; however, the site efficiently retained pulses of fertilizer NO3–N derived from an upstream farm. This capacity for retaining N pulses indicates that the potential nutrient removal capacity of TLRP is much higher than measured annual rates. Our results illustrate the importance of considering both organic and inorganic forms of N and P when assessing the benefits of wetland restoration. We suggest that for wetland restoration to be an efficient tool in the amelioration of coastal eutrophication a better understanding of the coupled movement of the various forms of N and P is necessary.
Key wordswetland restoration nitrogen phosphorus retention mitigation
- APHA, American Public Health Association. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
- Army Corps of Engineers. 1997. Umbrella Memorandum of agreement between bank sponsors, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al. In: U.S.A.C.o. Ed. Engineers. p 27.Google Scholar
- Bruland GL, Richardson CJ. 2005. Spatial variability of soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:273–84.Google Scholar
- Chesapeake Bay Program 2000. Chesapeake 2000. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12081.PDF.
- Dahl TE. 2006. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Efron B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics CBMS-NSF Monographs 38.Google Scholar
- Koroleff F. 1983. Simultaneous oxidation of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds by persulfate. In: Grasshoff K, Eberhardt M, Kremling K, Eds. Methods of seawater analysis. New York: Wiley VCH. Google Scholar
- Likens GE, Bormann FH. 1995. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2007. Wetlands. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.Google Scholar
- Morse JL. 2010. Farm fields to wetlands: Biogeochemical consequences of re-flooding in coastal plain agricultural lands. Durham: University Program in Ecology. Duke University. p 134.Google Scholar
- Needham R. 2006. Implementation plan for agricultural restoration at Timberlake farms. Wilmington (NC): Needham Environmental Inc.Google Scholar
- Neely H. 2008. Restoring farmland to wetlands: the potential for carbon credits in eastern North Carolina. Durham (NC): Nicholas School of the Environment. Duke University. p 31.Google Scholar
- Richardson CJ, Ed. 2008. The Everglades experiments. Lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Skaggs RW, Gilliam JW, Sheets TJ. 1980. Effect of agricultural land development on drainage waters in North Carolina Tidewater region. Raleigh (NC): Water Resources Research Institute, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- State Climate Office of North Carolina. 2009. http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/climate/drought.php.
- USFW.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. http://www.fws.gov/PocosinLakes/news/news-erf-out.html
- Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman GD. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–50.Google Scholar
- Weller DE, Mitsch WJ, Hogan DM, Hogan DE. 1994. Denitrification in riparian forests receiving agricultural discharges. In: Mitsch WJ, Ed. Global wetlands; old world and new. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
- Winter TC. 1981. Uncertainties in estimating water balance of lakes. Water Resour Bull 17:82–115.Google Scholar
- Woltemade CJ. 2000. Ability of restored wetlands to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in agricultural drainage water. J Soil Water Conserv 55:303–9.Google Scholar