, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 157–170 | Cite as

Additive Partitioning of Diversity Reveals No Scale-dependent Impacts of Large Ungulates on the Structure of Tundra Plant Communities

  • V. T. RavolainenEmail author
  • N. G. Yoccoz
  • K. A. Bråthen
  • R. A. Ims
  • M. Iversen
  • V. T. González


Large herbivores can change ecosystem functioning by impacting plant diversity. However, although such impacts are expected to be scale-dependent in ecosystems with wide-roaming ungulates, scaling issues rarely enter empirical assessments. We here test the hypothesis that the impact of increased reindeer abundance on plant diversity in alpine tundra is scale-dependent. Based on potentially high productivity of the focal habitat units and hence the possibility of positive grazer impacts on plant diversity we predicted higher α and β diversity at the habitat scale where reindeer densities are high. We also explored whether there were differences in diversity patterns at larger scales, including the scale of reindeer management districts. We estimated grazing disturbance as high versus low reindeer density in selected districts (a total extent of 7421 km2) of Northern Norway where reindeer-induced vegetation shifts are debated. We focus on dominance patterns because they can quantify the vegetation state and thus performed additive partitioning of Simpson diversity on multiple scales assessing also species’ contributions to diversity. Contrary to our predictions, we found only weak scale-dependent effects of reindeer grazing on plant diversity. Under high reindeer densities there was evidence for a landscape-scale homogenization of the vegetation, but the predicted α and β diversity increases at the habitat scale were not found. Consistently through all scales considered, four shrub species contributed the most to plant diversity. These results contradict the idea that reindeer at high stocking densities induce shifts in plant species dominance in productive habitats. We conclude that context-dependencies such as spatial scales of management units and habitat types need to be explicitly considered in evaluations of the impacts of large ungulates on plant diversity.


grazing tundra ecosystem shrub dominance abundant reindeer productivity gradients landscape elements management scale Fennoscandia 



We would like to thank Raphaël Pélissier for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article; Johan Olofsson, Rene Van der Wal, and one anonymuous referee for constructive criticisms; the Norwegian Coast Guard, Mette Nielsen, Tina Dahl, and Alina Evans for field assistance; Asle Lilletun for technical assistance; and participants in the project “Ecosystem Finnmark” for discussions. This study is a contribution from the “Ecosystem Finnmark” project and was financed by the Norwegian Research Council.

Supplementary material

10021_2009_9308_MOESM1_ESM.doc (24 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 24 kb)
10021_2009_9308_MOESM2_ESM.doc (48 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 47 kb)


  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30(30):1–67.Google Scholar
  2. Adler PB, Raff DA, Lauenroth WK. 2001. The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 128:465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 2003. Ressursregnskap for reindriftsforvaltningen. Alta, Norway (in Norwegian): Reindriftsforvaltningen.Google Scholar
  4. Asner GP, Levick SR, Kennedy-Bowdoin T, Knapp DE, Emerson R, Jacobson J, Colgan MS, Martin RE. 2009. Large-scale impacts of herbivores on the structural diversity of African savannas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4947–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Augustine DJ. 2003. Spatial heterogeneity in the herbaceous layer of a semi-arid savanna ecosystem. Plant Ecol 167:319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ. 1998. Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:1165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Austrheim G, Eriksson O. 2001. Plant species diversity and grazing in the Scandinavian mountains—patterns and processes at different spatial scales. Ecography 24:683–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardgett RD. 2005. The biology of soil—a community and ecosystem approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bardgett RD, Wardle DA. 2003. Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84:2258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billings WD. 2000. Alpine vegetation. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD, Eds. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Bliss LC. 2000. Arctic tundra and polar desert biome. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD, Eds. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE. 2006. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangel Ecol Manag 59:225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bråthen KA, Oksanen J. 2001. Reindeer reduce biomass of preferred plant species. J Veg Sci 12:473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bråthen KA, Hagberg O. 2004. More efficient estimation of plant biomass. J Veg Sci 15:653–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bråthen KA, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Hausner V. 2007. Induced shift in ecosystem productivity? Extensive scale effects of abundant large herbivores. Ecosystems 10:773–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bye K, Nilsson E, Ekendahl B, Warenberg K. 1997. Flora i reinbeiteland. Landbruksforl. (in Norwegian): Nordisk organ for reinforskning.Google Scholar
  17. Cingolani AM, Noy-Meir I, Diaz S. 2005. Grazing effects on rangeland diversity: a synthesis of contemporary models. Ecol Appl 15:757–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins SL, Smith MD. 2006. Scale-dependent interaction of fire and grazing on community heterogeneity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 87:2058–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Connell JH. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs—High diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199:1302–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox DR, Wermuth N. 1992. A comment on the coefficient of determination for binary responses. Am Stat 46:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Den Herder M, Virtanen R, Roininen H. 2008. Reindeer herbivory reduces willow growth and grouse forage in a forest-tundra ecotone. Basic Appl Ecol 9:324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edenius L, Vencatasawmy CP, Sandstrom P, Dahlberg U. 2003. Combining satellite imagery and ancillary data to map snowbed vegetation important to reindeer Rangifer tarandus. Arct Antarct Alp Res 35:150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. RI ES. 2004. Geoprocessing in ArcGIS. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Frank DA. 2005. The interactive effects of grazing ungulates and aboveground production on grassland diversity. Oecologia 143:629–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Frank DA, McNaughton SJ, Tracy BF. 1998. The ecology of the Earth’s grazing ecosystems. Bioscience 48:513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grime JP. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hester AJ, Bergman M, Iason GR, Moen J. 2006. Impacts of large herbivores on plant community structure and dynamics. In: Bergström R, Duncan P, Pastor J, Danell K, Eds. Large herbivore ecology ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 97–141.Google Scholar
  28. Hobbs NT. 2003. Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. For Ecol Manag 181:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion—implications for conservations. Conserv Biol 6:324–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Bråthen KA, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Hausner V. 2007. Can reindeer overabundance cause a trophic cascade? Ecosystems 10:607–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jefferies RL, Klein DR, Shaver GR. 1994. Vertebrate herbivores and northern plant-communities—reciprocal influences and responses. Oikos 71:193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Killengreen S, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Bråthen KA, Henden J-A, Schott T. 2007. Structural characteristics of a low Arctic tundra ecosystem and the retreat of the Arctic fox. Biol Conserv 135:475–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lande R, DeVries PJ, Walla TR. 2000. When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples. Oikos 89:601–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lid J, Elven R, Lid DT. 1994. Norsk flora. Oslo (in Norwegian): Det norske samlaget.Google Scholar
  36. Loreau M. 2000. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ.Google Scholar
  38. Manier DJ, Hobbs NT. 2006. Large herbivores influence the composition and diversity of shrub-steppe communities in the Rocky Mountains, USA. Oecologia 146:641–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McNaughton SJ. 1983. Serengeti grassland ecology—the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol Monogr 53:291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK. 1988. A generalized-model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am Nat 132:87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moen J, Danell O. 2003. Reindeer in the Swedish mountains: an assessment of grazing impacts. Ambio 32:397–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Moen A, Odland A, Lillethun A. 1999. Vegetation. Hønefoss, Norway: Norwegian Mapping Authority.Google Scholar
  43. Muga DA. 1986. A commentary on the historical transformation of the Sami communal mode of production. J Ethn Stud 14:111–21.Google Scholar
  44. Mysterud A. 2006. The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores. Wildl Biol 12:129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mårell A, Ball JP, Hofgaard A. 2002. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Levy flights. Can J Zool-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 80:854–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mårell A, Edenius L. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity and hierarchical feeding habitat selection by reindeer. Arct Antarct Alp Res 38:413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naess MW, Fauchald P, Tveraa T. 2009. Scale dependency and the “Marginal” value of labor. Hum Ecol 37:193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nilsson MC, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Jaderlund A. 2002. Effects of alleviation of ecological stresses on an alpine tundra community over an eight-year period. Oikos 97:3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olff H, Ritchie ME. 1998. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olofsson J. 2006. Plant diversity and resilience to reindeer grazing. Arct Antarct Alp Res 38:131–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olofsson J, Kitti H, Rautiainen P, Stark S, Oksanen L. 2001. Effects of summer grazing by reindeer on composition of vegetation, productivity and nitrogen cycling. Ecography 24:13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olofsson J, Oksanen L. 2005. Effects of reindeer density on vascular plant diversity on North Scandinavian mountains. Rangifer 25:5–18.Google Scholar
  53. Olofsson J, Oksanen L, Callaghan T, Hulme PE, Oksanen T, Suominen O. 2009. Herbivores inhibit climate-driven shrub expansion on the tundra. Glob Chang Biol (in press).Google Scholar
  54. Pastor J, Cohen Y, Hobbs NT. 2006. The roles of large herbivores in ecosystem nutrient cycles. In: Danell K, Bergström R, Duncan P, Pastor J, Eds. Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. p 289–325.Google Scholar
  55. Pélissier R, Couteron P. 2007. An operational, additive framework for species diversity partitioning and beta-diversity analysis. J Ecol 95:294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Proulx M, Mazumder A. 1998. Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology 79:2581–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team. (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  58. Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37:789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  60. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skarpe C, Van der Wal R. 2002. Effects of simulated browsing and length of growing season on leaf characteristics and flowering in a deciduous Arctic shrub, Salix polaris. Arct Antarct Alp Res 34:282–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Skogland T. 1980. Comparative summer feeding strategies of Arctic and alpine Rangifer. J Anim Ecol 49:81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stohlgren TJ, Schell LD, Van den Heuvel B. 1999. How grazing and soil quality affect native and exotic plant diversity in rocky mountain grasslands. Ecol Appl 9:45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sugihara G. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement—comment. J Am Stat Assoc 77:564–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tolvanen A, Schroderus J, Henry GHR. 2001. Age- and stage-based bud demography of Salix arctica under contrasting muskox grazing pressure in the High Arctic. Evol Ecol 15:443–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA, Aanes R, Hogda KA. 2007. What regulate and limit reindeer populations in Norway? Oikos 116:706–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tybirk K, Nilsson MC, Michelson A, Kristensen HL, Shevtsova A, Strandberg MT, Johansson M, Nielsen KE, Rils-Nielsen T, Strandberg B, Johnsen I. 2000. Nordic Empetrum dominated ecosystems: function and susceptibility to environmental changes. Ambio 29:90–7.Google Scholar
  68. Van der Wal R. 2006. Do herbivores cause habitat degradation or vegetation state transition? Evidence from the tundra. Oikos 114:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van der Wal R, Madan N, Van Lieshout S, Dormann C, Langvatn R, Albon SD. 2000. Trading forage quality for quantity? Plant phenology and patch choice by Svalbard reindeer. Oecologia 123:108–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Veech JA, Summerville KS, Crist TO, Gering JC. 2002. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vistnes I, Nelleman C. 2002. Avoidance of cabins, roads and power lines by reindeer during calving. Reindeer as a keystone species in the north—biological, cultural and socio-economic aspects, Arctic Centre Reports 38. University of Lapland, Rovaniemi. pp 113–123.Google Scholar
  72. Walker DA, Raynolds MK, Daniels FJA, Einarsson E, Elvebakk A, Gould WA, Katenin AE, Kholod SS, Markon CJ, Melnikov ES, Moskalenko NG, Talbot SS, Yurtsev BA, CAVM Team. 2005. The circumpolar arctic vegetation map. J Veg Sci 16:267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manag 42:266–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wiens JA. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wiens JA, Stenseth NC, Vanhorne B, Ims RA. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zimov SA, Chuprynin VI, Oreshko AP, Chapin FS, Reynolds JF, Chapin MC. 1995. Steppe-tundra transition—a herbivore-driven biome shift at the end of the Pleistocene. Am Nat 146:765–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. T. Ravolainen
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. G. Yoccoz
    • 1
  • K. A. Bråthen
    • 1
  • R. A. Ims
    • 1
  • M. Iversen
    • 2
  • V. T. González
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Arctic and Marine BiologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Sami CollegeGuovdageaidnuNorway

Personalised recommendations