, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 1246–1267 | Cite as

Forest Fire Impacts on Carbon Uptake, Storage, and Emission: The Role of Burn Severity in the Eastern Cascades, Oregon

  • Garrett W. Meigs
  • Daniel C. Donato
  • John L. Campbell
  • Jonathan G. Martin
  • Beverly E. Law


This study quantifies the short-term effects of low-, moderate-, and high-severity fire on carbon pools and fluxes in the Eastern Cascades of Oregon. We surveyed 64 forest stands across four fires that burned 41,000 ha (35%) of the Metolius Watershed in 2002 and 2003, stratifying the landscape by burn severity (overstory tree mortality), forest type (ponderosa pine [PP] and mixed-conifer [MC]), and prefire biomass. Stand-scale C combustion ranged from 13 to 35% of prefire aboveground C pools (area − weighted mean = 22%). Across the sampled landscape, total estimated pyrogenic C emissions were equivalent to 2.5% of statewide anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes for the same 2-year period. From low- to moderate- to high-severity ponderosa pine stands, average tree basal area mortality was 14, 49, and 100%, with parallel patterns in mixed-conifer stands (29, 58, 96%). Despite this decline in live aboveground C, total net primary productivity (NPP) was only 40% lower in high- versus low-severity stands, suggesting strong compensatory effects of non-tree vegetation on C uptake. Dead wood respiratory losses were small relative to total NPP (range: 10–35%), reflecting decomposition lags in this seasonally arid system. Although soil C, soil respiration, and fine root NPP were conserved across severity classes, net ecosystem production (NEP) declined with increasing severity, driven by trends in aboveground NPP. The high variability of C responses across this study underscores the need to account for landscape patterns of burn severity, particularly in regions such as the Pacific Northwest, where non-stand-replacement fire represents a large proportion of annual burned area.


carbon balance Cascade Range disturbance fire emissions heterotrophic respiration mixed-severity fire regime net ecosystem production net primary productivity Pinus ponderosa wildfire 


  1. Amiro BD, Todd JB, Wotton BM, Logan KA, Flannigan MD, Stocks BJ, Mason JA, Martell DL, Hirsch KG. 2001. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959–1999. Can J For Res 31:512–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen CP, Phillips DL, Rygiewicz PT, Storm MJ. 2008. Fine root growth and mortality in different-aged ponderosa pine stands. Can J For Res 38:1797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balshi MS, McGuire AD, Duffy P, Flannigan M, Walsh J, Melillo JM. 2009. Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach. Glob Change Biol 15:578–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birdsey RA, Jenkins JC, Johnston M, Huber-Sannwald E, Amiro BD, de Jong B, Barra JDE, French NHF, Garcia-Oliva F, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Jaramillo VJ, Johnsen K, Law BE, Marín-Spiotta E, Masera O, Neilson R, Pan Y, Pregitzer KS. 2007. North American forests. In: King AW, Dilling L, Zimmerman GP, Fairman DM, Houghton RA, Marland G, Rose AZ, Wilbanks TJ, Eds. The first State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The North American carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Asheville: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center. p 117–26.Google Scholar
  5. Bork BJ. 1985. Fire history in three vegetation types on the eastern side of the Oregon Cascades. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University. 94 p.Google Scholar
  6. Bormann BT, Homann PS, Darbyshire RL, Morrissette BA. 2008. Intense forest wildfire sharply reduces mineral soil C and N: the first direct evidence. Can J For Res 38:2771–83.Google Scholar
  7. Brown JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woods material. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-GTR-16. Ogden.Google Scholar
  8. Busse MD, Cochran PH, Barren JW. 1996. Changes in ponderosa pine site productivity following removal of understory vegetation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1614–21.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell JL, Alberti G, Martin JG, Law BE. 2009. Carbon dynamics of a ponderosa pine plantation following a thinning treatment in the northern Sierra Nevada. For Ecol Manag 257:453–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell JL, Donato DC, Azuma DL, Law BE. 2007. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J Geophys Res 112:G04014.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell JL, Law BE. 2005. Forest soil respiration across three climatically distinct chronosequences in Oregon. Biogeochemistry 73:109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell JL, Sun OJ, Law BE. 2004. Disturbance and net ecosystem production across three climatically distinct forest landscapes. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18.Google Scholar
  13. CCAR. 2007. Forest sector protocol version 2.1. California Climate Action Registry (CCAR).
  14. Chambers JQ, Fisher JI, Zeng HC, Chapman EL, Baker DB, Hurtt GC. 2007. Hurricane Katrina’s carbon footprint on U. S. Gulf Coast forests. Science 318:1107.Google Scholar
  15. Chapin FSIII, Matson PA, Mooney HA. 2002. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Chapin FSIII, Woodwell GM, Randerson JT, Rastetter EB, Lovett GM, Baldocchi DD, Clark DA, Harmon ME, Schimel DS, Valentini R, Wirth C, Aber JD, Cole JJ, Goulden ML, Harden JW, Heimann M, Howarth RW, Matson PA, McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Neff JC, Houghton RA, Pace ML, Ryan MG, Running SW, Sala OE, Schlesinger WH, Schulze ED. 2006. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems 9:1041–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen H, Harmon ME, Sexton JM, Fasth B. 2002. Fine-root decomposition and N dynamics in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Can J For Res 32:320–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cline SP, Berg AB, Wight HM. 1980. Snag characteristics and dynamics in Douglas-fir forests, western Oregon. J Wildlife Manag 44:773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daly C, Gibson WP, Taylor GH, Johnson GL, Pasteris P. 2002. A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Clim Res 22:99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DAYMET. 2009. Distributed climate data,
  21. DeLuca TH, Aplet GH. 2008. Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain West. Front Ecol Environ 6:18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donato DC, Campbell JL, Fontaine JB, Law BE. 2009a. Quantifying char in postfire woody detritus inventories. Fire Ecol 5(2):104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donato DC, Fontaine JB, Campbell JL, Robinson WD, Kauffman JB, Law BE. 2009b. Early conifer regeneration in stand-replacement portions of a large mixed-severity wildfire in the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon. Can J For Res 39:823–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dore S, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Sullivan BW, Winslow WD, Hart SC, Kaye JP, Koch GW, Hungate BA. 2008. Long-term impact of a stand-replacing fire on ecosystem CO2 exchange of a ponderosa pine forest. Glob Change Biol 14:1801–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eyre FH, Eds.1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Fitzgerald SA. 2005. Fire ecology of ponderosa pine and the rebuilding of fire-resilient ponderosa pine ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the symposium on ponderosa pine: issues, trends, and management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-198, 18–21 October 2004, Klamath Falls, OR, Albany.Google Scholar
  27. Franklin JF, Dyrness CT. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-8. Portland.Google Scholar
  28. Franklin SE, Waring RH, McCreight RW, Cohen WB, Fiorella M. 1995. Aerial and satellite sensor detection and classification of western spruce budworm defoliation in a subalpine forest. Can J Remote Sens 21:299–308.Google Scholar
  29. French NHF, Kasischke ES, Hall RJ, Murphy KA, Verbyla DL, Hoy EE, Allen JL. 2008. Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results. Int J Wildland Fire 17:443–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goward SN, Masek JG, Cohen WB, Moisen G, Collatz GJ, Healey SP, Houghton RA, Huang C, Kennedy RE, Law BE, Powell SL, Turner DP, Wulder MA. 2008. Forest disturbance and North American carbon flux Eos, transactions. Am Geophys Union 89:105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gough CM, Vogel CS, Harrold KH, George K, Curtis PS. 2007. The legacy of harvest and fire on ecosystem carbon storage in a north temperate forest. Glob Change Biol 13:1935–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harmon ME, Bible K, Ryan MG, Shaw DC, Chen H, Klopatek J, Li X. 2004. Production, respiration, and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7:498–512.Google Scholar
  33. Harmon ME, Fasth B, Sexton JM. 2005. Bole decomposition rates of seventeen tree species in Western U.S.A.: a report prepared for the Pacific Northwest Experiment Station, the Joint Fire Sciences Program, and the Forest Management Service Center of WO Forest Management Staff.
  34. Harmon ME, Sexton JM. 1996. Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. U.S. long term ecological research program network, vol. 20. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  35. Hessburg PF, Salter RB, James KM. 2007. Re-examining fire severity relations in pre-management era mixed conifer forests: inferences from landscape patterns of forest structure. Landsc Ecol 22:5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hicke JA, Asner GP, Kasischke ES, French NHF, Randerson JT, Collatz GJ, Stocks BJ, Tucker CJ, Los SO, Field CB. 2003. Postfire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analyzed with satellite observations. Glob Change Biol 9:1145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hudiburg T. 2008. Climate, management, and forest type influences on carbon dynamics of West-Coast US forests. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University. 86 p.Google Scholar
  38. Hudiburg T, Law BE, Turner DP, Campbell JL, Donato DC, Duane M. 2009. Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage. Ecol Appl 19:163–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurteau MD, Koch GW, Hungate BA. 2008. Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets. Front Ecol Environ 6:493–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York.
  41. Irvine J, Law BE, Hibbard KA. 2007. Postfire carbon pools and fluxes in semiarid ponderosa pine in Central Oregon. Glob Change Biol 13:1748–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Irvine J, Law BE, Martin JG, Vickers D. 2008. Interannual variation in soil CO2 efflux and the response of root respiration to climate and canopy gas exchange in mature ponderosa pine. Glob Change Biol 14:2848–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kashian DM, Romme WH, Tinker DB, Turner MG, Ryan MG. 2006. Carbon storage on landscapes with stand-replacing fires. Bioscience 56:598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keane RE, Agee JK, Fulé P, Keeley JE, Key C, Kitchen SG, Miller R, Schulte LA. 2008. Ecological effects of large fires on US landscapes: benefit or catastrophe? Int J Wildland Fire 17:696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Key CH, Benson NC. 2006. Landscape assessment: Ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index; and remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Ratio. In Lutes DC, et al, Eds. FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD. Fort Collins.Google Scholar
  46. Kurz WA, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET. 2008. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1551–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Law BE, Arkebauer T, Campbell JL, Chen J, Sun O, Schwartz M, van Ingen C, Verma S. 2008. Terrestrial carbon observations: Protocols for vegetation sampling and data submission. Report 55, Global Terrestrial Observing System. FAO, Rome. 87 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Law BE, Ryan MG, Anthoni PM. 1999. Seasonal and annual respiration of a ponderosa pine ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 5:169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Law BE, Sun OJ, Campbell JL, Van Tuyl S, Thornton PE. 2003. Changes in carbon storage and fluxes in a chronosequence of ponderosa pine. Glob Change Biol 9:510–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Law BE, Thornton PE, Irvine J, Anthoni PM, Van Tuyl S. 2001a. Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages. Glob Change Biol 7:755–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Law BE, Van Tuyl S, Cescatti A, Baldocchi DD. 2001b. Estimation of leaf area index in open-canopy ponderosa pine forests at different successional stages and management regimes in Oregon. Agric For Meteorol 108:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Law BE, Waring RH. 1994. Combining remote sensing and climatic data to estimate net primary production across Oregon. Ecol Appl 4:717–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lentile LB, Smith FW, Shepperd WD. 2005. Patch structure, fire-scar formation, and tree regeneration in a large mixed-severity fire in the South Dakota Black Hills, USA. Can J For Res 35:2875–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin RE, Sapsis DB. 1991. Fires as agents of biodiversity: pyrodiversity promotes biodiversity. In: Harris RR, Erman DE, Kerner HM (technical coordinators), Eds. Proceedings of the symposium on biodiversity of northwestern California. Santa Rosa, CA: Wildland Resources Center, pp. 150–7.Google Scholar
  55. Maser C, Anderson RG, Cromack Jr K, Williams JT, Martin RE. 1979. Dead and down woody material. Wildlife habitats in managed forests of the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington, USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 553.Google Scholar
  56. McIver JD, Ottmar RD. 2007. Fuel mass and stand structure after post-fire logging of a severely burned ponderosa pine forest in northeastern Oregon. For Ecol Manag 238:268–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meigs GW. 2009. Carbon dynamics following landscape fire: influence of burn severity, climate, and stand history in the Metolius Watershed, Oregon. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University. 147 p.Google Scholar
  58. Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE. 2009. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitchell SR, Harmon ME, O’Connell KEB. 2009. Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Ecol Appl 19:643–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Monsanto PG, Agee JK. 2008. Long-term post-wildfire dynamics of coarse woody debris after salvage logging and implications for soil heating in dry forests of the eastern Cascades, Washington. For Ecol Manag 255:3952–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. North M, Hurteau M, Innes J. 2009. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecol Appl 19:1385–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ottmar RD, Sandberg DV, Riccardi CL, Prichard SJ. 2007. An overview of the fuel characteristic classification system—quantifying, classifying, and creating fuelbeds for resource planning. Can J For Res 37:2383–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pierce LL, Running SW. 1988. Rapid estimation of coniferous forest leaf-area index using a portable integrating radiometer. Ecology 69:1762–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Prichard SJ, Ottmar RD, Anderson GK. 2006. Consume 3.0 user’s guide. Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Seattle, WA.
  65. Rorig ML, Ferguson SA. 1999. Characteristics of lightning and wildland fire ignition in the Pacific Northwest. J Appl Meteorol 38:1565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roy DR, Boschetti L, Trigg SN. 2006. Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3:112–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Running SW. 2008. Ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate. Science 321:652–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Russell RE, Saab VA, Dudley JG, Rotella JJ. 2006. Snag longevity in relation to wildfire and postfire salvage logging. For Ecol Manag 232:179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Santantonio D, Hermann RK, Overton WS. 1977. Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. Pedobiologia 17:1–31.Google Scholar
  70. Savage M, Mast JN. 2005. How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires? Can J For Res 35:967–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schoennagel T, Veblen TT, Romme WH. 2004. The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. Bioscience 54:661–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schwind B. 2008. Monitoring trends in burn severity: report on the Pacific Northwest and Pacific Southwest fires—1984 to 2005. Available online:
  73. Simon SA. 1991. Fire history in the Jefferson Wilderness area of east of the Cascade Crest. A final report to the Deschutes National Forest Fire Staff.Google Scholar
  74. Soeriaatmadhe RE. 1966. Fire history of the ponderosa pine forests of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation Oregon. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  75. Sun OJ, Campbell JL, Law BE, Wolf V. 2004. Dynamics of carbon stocks in soils and detritus across chronosequences of different forest types in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Glob Change Biol 10:1470–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Swedberg KC. 1973. A transition coniferous forest in the Cascade Mountains of Northern Oregon. Am Midl Nat 89:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thomas CK, Law BE, Irvine J, Martin JG, Pettijohn JC, Davis KJ. 2009. Seasonal hydrology explains inter-annual and seasonal variation in carbon and water exchange in a semi-arid mature ponderosa pine forest in Central Oregon. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. doi:10.1029/2009JG001010.
  78. Thompson JR, Spies TA, Ganio LM. 2007. Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10743–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA. 1997. Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190:214–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turner DP, Ritts WD, Law BE, Cohen WB, Yang Z, Hudiburg T, Campbell JL, Duane M. 2007. Scaling net ecosystem production and net biome production over a heterogeneous region in the western United States. Biogeosciences 4:597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner MG, Tinker DB, Romme WH, Kashian DM, Litton CM. 2004. Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA). Ecosystems 7:751–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. USDA. 2003. Field instructions for the annual inventory of Washington, Oregon, and California Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland.Google Scholar
  83. Van Tuyl S, Law BE, Turner DP, Gitelman AI. 2005. Variability in net primary production and carbon storage in biomass across Oregon forests: an assessment integrating data from forest inventories, intensive sites, and remote sensing. For Ecol Manag 209:273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Wagner CE. 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. For Sci 14:20–6.Google Scholar
  85. Weaver H. 1959. Ecological changes in the ponderosa pine forest of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation in Oregon. J For 57:15–20.Google Scholar
  86. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Wirth C, Czimczik CI, Schulze ED. 2002. Beyond annual budgets: carbon flux at different temporal scales in fire-prone Siberian Scots pine forests. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 54:611–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zavitkovski J, Newton M. 1968. Ecological importance of snowbrush Ceanothus velutinus in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 49:1134–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garrett W. Meigs
    • 1
  • Daniel C. Donato
    • 2
  • John L. Campbell
    • 1
  • Jonathan G. Martin
    • 1
  • Beverly E. Law
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Ecosystems and SocietyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research StationInstitute of Pacific Islands ForestryHiloUSA

Personalised recommendations