Forest Fire Impacts on Carbon Uptake, Storage, and Emission: The Role of Burn Severity in the Eastern Cascades, Oregon
This study quantifies the short-term effects of low-, moderate-, and high-severity fire on carbon pools and fluxes in the Eastern Cascades of Oregon. We surveyed 64 forest stands across four fires that burned 41,000 ha (35%) of the Metolius Watershed in 2002 and 2003, stratifying the landscape by burn severity (overstory tree mortality), forest type (ponderosa pine [PP] and mixed-conifer [MC]), and prefire biomass. Stand-scale C combustion ranged from 13 to 35% of prefire aboveground C pools (area − weighted mean = 22%). Across the sampled landscape, total estimated pyrogenic C emissions were equivalent to 2.5% of statewide anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes for the same 2-year period. From low- to moderate- to high-severity ponderosa pine stands, average tree basal area mortality was 14, 49, and 100%, with parallel patterns in mixed-conifer stands (29, 58, 96%). Despite this decline in live aboveground C, total net primary productivity (NPP) was only 40% lower in high- versus low-severity stands, suggesting strong compensatory effects of non-tree vegetation on C uptake. Dead wood respiratory losses were small relative to total NPP (range: 10–35%), reflecting decomposition lags in this seasonally arid system. Although soil C, soil respiration, and fine root NPP were conserved across severity classes, net ecosystem production (NEP) declined with increasing severity, driven by trends in aboveground NPP. The high variability of C responses across this study underscores the need to account for landscape patterns of burn severity, particularly in regions such as the Pacific Northwest, where non-stand-replacement fire represents a large proportion of annual burned area.
Keywordscarbon balance Cascade Range disturbance fire emissions heterotrophic respiration mixed-severity fire regime net ecosystem production net primary productivity Pinus ponderosa wildfire
- Birdsey RA, Jenkins JC, Johnston M, Huber-Sannwald E, Amiro BD, de Jong B, Barra JDE, French NHF, Garcia-Oliva F, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Jaramillo VJ, Johnsen K, Law BE, Marín-Spiotta E, Masera O, Neilson R, Pan Y, Pregitzer KS. 2007. North American forests. In: King AW, Dilling L, Zimmerman GP, Fairman DM, Houghton RA, Marland G, Rose AZ, Wilbanks TJ, Eds. The first State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The North American carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Asheville: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center. p 117–26.Google Scholar
- Bork BJ. 1985. Fire history in three vegetation types on the eastern side of the Oregon Cascades. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University. 94 p.Google Scholar
- Bormann BT, Homann PS, Darbyshire RL, Morrissette BA. 2008. Intense forest wildfire sharply reduces mineral soil C and N: the first direct evidence. Can J For Res 38:2771–83.Google Scholar
- Brown JK. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woods material. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-GTR-16. Ogden.Google Scholar
- Busse MD, Cochran PH, Barren JW. 1996. Changes in ponderosa pine site productivity following removal of understory vegetation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1614–21.Google Scholar
- Campbell JL, Donato DC, Azuma DL, Law BE. 2007. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J Geophys Res 112:G04014.Google Scholar
- Campbell JL, Sun OJ, Law BE. 2004. Disturbance and net ecosystem production across three climatically distinct forest landscapes. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18.Google Scholar
- CCAR. 2007. Forest sector protocol version 2.1. California Climate Action Registry (CCAR). http://www.climateregistry.org/tools/protocols/industry-specific-protocols.html.
- Chambers JQ, Fisher JI, Zeng HC, Chapman EL, Baker DB, Hurtt GC. 2007. Hurricane Katrina’s carbon footprint on U. S. Gulf Coast forests. Science 318:1107.Google Scholar
- Chapin FSIII, Matson PA, Mooney HA. 2002. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Chapin FSIII, Woodwell GM, Randerson JT, Rastetter EB, Lovett GM, Baldocchi DD, Clark DA, Harmon ME, Schimel DS, Valentini R, Wirth C, Aber JD, Cole JJ, Goulden ML, Harden JW, Heimann M, Howarth RW, Matson PA, McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Neff JC, Houghton RA, Pace ML, Ryan MG, Running SW, Sala OE, Schlesinger WH, Schulze ED. 2006. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems 9:1041–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DAYMET. 2009. Distributed climate data, http://www.daymet.org/.
- Eyre FH, Eds.1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald SA. 2005. Fire ecology of ponderosa pine and the rebuilding of fire-resilient ponderosa pine ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the symposium on ponderosa pine: issues, trends, and management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-198, 18–21 October 2004, Klamath Falls, OR, Albany.Google Scholar
- Franklin JF, Dyrness CT. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-8. Portland.Google Scholar
- Franklin SE, Waring RH, McCreight RW, Cohen WB, Fiorella M. 1995. Aerial and satellite sensor detection and classification of western spruce budworm defoliation in a subalpine forest. Can J Remote Sens 21:299–308.Google Scholar
- Harmon ME, Bible K, Ryan MG, Shaw DC, Chen H, Klopatek J, Li X. 2004. Production, respiration, and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7:498–512.Google Scholar
- Harmon ME, Fasth B, Sexton JM. 2005. Bole decomposition rates of seventeen tree species in Western U.S.A.: a report prepared for the Pacific Northwest Experiment Station, the Joint Fire Sciences Program, and the Forest Management Service Center of WO Forest Management Staff. http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/webdocs/reports/decomp/cwd_decomp_web.htm.
- Harmon ME, Sexton JM. 1996. Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. U.S. long term ecological research program network, vol. 20. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- Hudiburg T. 2008. Climate, management, and forest type influences on carbon dynamics of West-Coast US forests. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University. 86 p.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York. http://www.ipcc.ch.
- Key CH, Benson NC. 2006. Landscape assessment: Ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index; and remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Ratio. In Lutes DC, et al, Eds. FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD. Fort Collins.Google Scholar
- Law BE, Arkebauer T, Campbell JL, Chen J, Sun O, Schwartz M, van Ingen C, Verma S. 2008. Terrestrial carbon observations: Protocols for vegetation sampling and data submission. Report 55, Global Terrestrial Observing System. FAO, Rome. 87 pp.Google Scholar
- Martin RE, Sapsis DB. 1991. Fires as agents of biodiversity: pyrodiversity promotes biodiversity. In: Harris RR, Erman DE, Kerner HM (technical coordinators), Eds. Proceedings of the symposium on biodiversity of northwestern California. Santa Rosa, CA: Wildland Resources Center, pp. 150–7.Google Scholar
- Maser C, Anderson RG, Cromack Jr K, Williams JT, Martin RE. 1979. Dead and down woody material. Wildlife habitats in managed forests of the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington, USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 553.Google Scholar
- Meigs GW. 2009. Carbon dynamics following landscape fire: influence of burn severity, climate, and stand history in the Metolius Watershed, Oregon. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University. 147 p.Google Scholar
- Prichard SJ, Ottmar RD, Anderson GK. 2006. Consume 3.0 user’s guide. Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Seattle, WA. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/research/smoke/consume/index.shtml.
- Santantonio D, Hermann RK, Overton WS. 1977. Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. Pedobiologia 17:1–31.Google Scholar
- Schwind B. 2008. Monitoring trends in burn severity: report on the Pacific Northwest and Pacific Southwest fires—1984 to 2005. Available online: http://mtbs.gov.
- Simon SA. 1991. Fire history in the Jefferson Wilderness area of east of the Cascade Crest. A final report to the Deschutes National Forest Fire Staff.Google Scholar
- Soeriaatmadhe RE. 1966. Fire history of the ponderosa pine forests of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation Oregon. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- Thomas CK, Law BE, Irvine J, Martin JG, Pettijohn JC, Davis KJ. 2009. Seasonal hydrology explains inter-annual and seasonal variation in carbon and water exchange in a semi-arid mature ponderosa pine forest in Central Oregon. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. doi:10.1029/2009JG001010.
- USDA. 2003. Field instructions for the annual inventory of Washington, Oregon, and California Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland.Google Scholar
- Van Wagner CE. 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. For Sci 14:20–6.Google Scholar
- Weaver H. 1959. Ecological changes in the ponderosa pine forest of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation in Oregon. J For 57:15–20.Google Scholar