, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 777–791 | Cite as

Effects of Partial Harvest on the Carbon Stores in Douglas-fir/Western Hemlock Forests: A Simulation Study



The STANDCARB 2.0 model was used to examine the effects of partial harvest of trees within stands on forest-related carbon (C) stores in a typical Pacific Northwest Pseudotsuga/Tsuga forest. For harvest rotation intervals of 20 to 250 years the effect of completely dispersed (that is, a checkerboard) versus completely aggregated cutting patterns (that is, single blocks) was compared. The simulations indicated that forests with frequent, but partial removal of live trees can store as much C as those with complete tree harvest on less frequent intervals. Stores in forest products generally declined as the fraction of live trees harvested declined and as the interval between harvests increased. Although the proportion of total system stores in forest products increased as the frequency of harvests and proportion of trees removed increased, this did not offset the reduction in forest C stores these treatments caused. Spatial arrangement of harvest influenced tree species composition profoundly; however, the effects of aggregated versus dispersed cutting patterns on C stores were relatively small compared to the other treatments. This study indicates that there are multiple methods to increase C stores in the forest sector including either increasing the time between harvests or reducing the fraction of trees harvested during each harvest.

Key words

carbon sequestration carbon management and dynamics disturbance forest products simulation modeling Pacific Northwest 

Supplementary material


  1. Acker, SA, Halpern, CB, Harmon, ME, Dyrness, CT. 2002. Trends in bole biomass accumulation, net primary production, and tree mortality in Pseudotsuga menziesii forests of contrasting age. Tree Physiology 22: 213–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, SA, Harcombe, PA, Harmon, ME, Greene, SE. 2000. Biomass accumulation over the first 150 years in coastal Oregon Picea-Tsuga forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 725–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balboa-Murias, MA, Rodríguez-Soallerio, R, Merino, A, Álvarez-González, JG. 2006. Temporal variations and distribution of C stocks in aboveground biomass of radiata pine and maritime pine pure stands under different silvicultural alternatives. Forest Ecology and Management 237: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, GH. 1962. Yield of even-aged stands of western hemlock. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1273. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Beese, WJ, Bryant, AA. 1999. Effect of alternative silvicultural systems on vegetation and bird communities in coastal montane forests of British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourque, CP, Neilson, ET, Gruenwald, C, Perrin, SF, Hiltz, JC, Blin, YA, Horsman, GV, Parker, MS, Thorburn, CB, Corey, MM, Meng, F, Swift. DE. 2007. Optimizing carbon sequestration in commercial forests by integrating carbon management objectives in wood supply modeling. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12:1253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breshears, DD, Allen, CD. 2002. The importance of rapid, disturbance-induced losses in C management and sequestration. Global Change Biology 11:1–5.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, S, Gillespie, AJR, and Lugo, AE. 1991. Biomass of tropical forests of south and southeast Asia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, JL, Donato, D, Azuma, D, Law, B. 2008. Pyrogenic emissions from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. Journal of Geophysical research 117(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Cias, P, Tans, P, Trolier, M, White, JWC, Francey, RJ. 1995. A large northern hemisphere terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2. Science 269:1098–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, CF. 1983. C storage in managed forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cropper, WP, Ewel, KC. 1987. A regional C storage simulation for large-scale biomass plantations. Ecological Modelling 36:171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewar, RC, Cannell, MGR. 1992. C sequestration in the trees, products, and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiology 11:49–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewar, RC. 1991. Analytical model of C storage in the trees, soils, and wood products of managed forests. Tree Physiology 8:239–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon, RK, Brown, S, Houghton, RA, Solomon, AM, Trexler, MC, Wisniewski, J. 1994. C pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grier, CC, Logan, RS. 1977. Old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii communities of a western Oregon watershed: Biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecological Monographs 47: 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurney KR, Law, RM, Denning, AS. 2002. Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models. Nature 415: 626–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, CAS, Uhlig, J. 1991. Refining estimates of C released from tropical land-use change. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmon ME. Woody detritus mass and its contribution to carbon dynamics of old-growth forests: the temporal context. In: Wirth C, Gleixner G, Heimann M, Eds. Old-growth forests: function, fate and value. Ecological studies. New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmon, ME. 2001. C sequestration in forests: Addressing the scale question. Journal of Forestry 99(4): 24–9.Google Scholar
  21. Harmon, ME, Bible, K, Ryan, MJ, Shaw, D, Chen, H, Klopatek, J, Li X. 2004. Production, respiration, and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga/Tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7: 498–512.Google Scholar
  22. Harmon, ME, Ferrell, WK, Franklin, JF. 1990. Effects of C storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247: 699–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harmon, ME, Harmon, JM, Ferrell, WK, Brooks, D. 1996. Modeling the accumulation of forest products in the Pacific Northwest. Climatic Change 33: 521–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harmon, ME, Marks, B. 2002. Effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon stores in forest stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 863–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hennigar, CR, MacLean, DA, Amos-Binks, LJ. 2008. A novel approach to optimize management strategies for carbon stored in both forests and wood products. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 786–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houghton, RA. 1991. Releases of C to the atmosphere from degradation of forest in tropical Asia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houghton, RA, Hobbie, JE, Melillo, JM, Moore, B, Peterson, BJ, Shaver, GR, Woodwell, GM. 1983. Changes in the C content of terrestrial biota and soil between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecology 53: 235–62.Google Scholar
  28. Jiang, H, Apps, MJ, Peng, C, Zhang, Y, Liu J. 2002. Modeling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest C dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management 169: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnsen, KH, Wear, D, Oren, R, Teskey, RO, Sanchez, F, Will, R, Butnor, J, Markewitz, D, Richter, D, Rials, T, Allen, HL, Seiler, J, Ellsworth, D, Maier, C, Katul, G, Dougherty, PM. 2001. Meeting global policy commitments: C sequestration and southern pine forests. Journal of Forestry 99(4): 14–21.Google Scholar
  30. Kauppi, PE, Mielikainen, K, Kuusela, K. 1992. Biomass and C budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256: 70–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kershaw, JA, Oliver, CD, Hinckley, TM. 1993. Effect of harvest of old-growth Douglas-fir stands and subsequent management on C dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 1: 61–77.Google Scholar
  32. Kurz, WA, Beukema SJ, Apps, MJ. 1998. Carbon budget implications of transition from natural to managed disturbance regimes in forest landscapes. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2: 405–21.Google Scholar
  33. Kurz WA, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET. 2008. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:1551–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liski, J, Pussinen, A, Pingoud, K, Mäkipää, R, Karjalainen, T. 2001. Which rotation length is favorable to C sequestration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 2004–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McArdle, RE, Meyer, WH. 1930. The yield of Douglas fir in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 201. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, JS. 1963. Energy stores and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pacala, S, Socolow, R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305: 968–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pacala, SW, Hunt, GC, Houghton, RA, Birdsey, RA, Heath, L, Sundquist, ET, Stallard, RF, Baker, D, Peylin, P, Moorecroft, P, Caspersen, J, Shevliakova, E, Harmon, ME, Fan, S.-M, Sarmiento, JL, Goodale, C, Field, CB, Gloor, M, Schimel, D. 2001. Convergence of U.S. C flux estimates from inventories of ecosystems and inversions of atmospheric data. Science 292: 2316–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Post, WM, Peng, T, Emanuel, WR, King, AW, Dale, VH, DeAngelis, DL. 1990. The global C cycle. American Scientist 78: 310–26.Google Scholar
  40. Pussinen, A, Karjalainen, T, Mäkipää, R, Valsta, L, Kellomäki, S. 2002. Forest C sequestration and harvests in Scots pine stand under different climate and nitrogen deposition scenarios. Forest Ecology and Management 158: 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richter, DD, Markewitz, D, Trumbore, SE, Wells CG. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest Nature 400: 56–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan, MG, Binkley, D, Fownes, JH. 1997. Age-related decline in forest productivity : Pattern and process. Advances in Ecological Research 27: 213–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schroeder, P. 1992. C storage potential of short rotation tropical tree plantation. Forest Ecology and Management 50: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulze, E.-D, Wirth, C, Heimann, M. 2000. Managing forests after Kyoto. Science 289: 2058–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sedjo RA, Solomon AM. 1991. Climate and forests. In: Rosenburg NJ, Easterling WE, Crosson PR, Darmstadter J, Eds. Greenhouse warming: abatement and adaptation. Washington, DC: Resources For the Future. p 105–19Google Scholar
  46. Seely, B, Welham, C, Kimmins, H. 2002. C sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem: results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORECAST. Forest Ecology and Management 169: 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smithwick, EAH, Harmon, ME, Domingo, JB. 2003. Modeling multiscale effects of light limitations and edge-induced mortality on C stores in forest landscapes. Landscape Ecology 18: 701–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smithwick, EAH, Harmon, ME, Domingo, JB. 2007. Changing temporal patterns of forest C stores and net ecosystem C balance: The stand to landscape transformation. Landscape Ecology 22: 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smithwick, EAH, Harmon, ME, Remillard, SM, Acker, SA, Franklin JF. 2002. Potential upper bounds of C stores in forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 12: 1303–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tans, PP, Fung, IY, Takahashii, T. 1990. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science 247: 1432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thornley, JH, Cannell, M. G. 2000. Managing forests for wood yield and C storage: a theoretical study. Tree Physiology 20: 477–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tinker, DB, Knight, DH. 2000. Coarse woody debris following fire and logging in Wyoming lodgepole pine forests. Ecosystems 3: 472–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urban DL, Shugart HH. 1992. Individual-based models of forest succession. In: Glen-Lewin DC, Peet RK, Veblen TT, Eds. Plant succession: theory and prediction. London: Chapman and Hall. p 249–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Harmon
    • 1
  • Adam Moreno
    • 1
  • James B. Domingo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations