Ecosystems

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 831–840 | Cite as

Decomposition and Fragmentation of Coarse Woody Debris: Re-visiting a Boreal Black Spruce Chronosequence

Article

Abstract

We re-visited a seven-stand boreal chronosequence west of Thompson, Manitoba, Canada, in which coarse woody debris (CWD) and its instantaneous decomposition were measured in 2000. New CWD measurements were performed in 2007, and tree inventories updated to provide mortality and snag failure data. These data were used to model CWD changes, compare methods of estimating decomposition, and infer possible fragmentation rates. Measured CWD was between 9.7 (in both the 77- and 43-year-old stands) and 80.4 (in the 18-year-old stand) Mg ha−1 in 2007. Spatial variability was high; at most stands CWD levels had not changed significantly from 2000 to 2007. Tree mortality was a significant flux only in older stands, whereas snag fall rate varied by an order of magnitude, from 2.9% y−1 (0.2 Mg ha−1 y−1) in the 9-year-old stand to 9.8% y−1 (2.3 Mg ha−1 y−1) in the 12-year-old stand. A one-pool model based on these inputs underestimated actual 2000–2007 CWD decomposition in the younger stands, suggesting that fragmentation could be an important part of the carbon flux exiting the CWD pool. We compared three independent measures of annual decomposition (k): direct measurements of CWD respiration, rates based on the 7-year re-sampling effort described here, and rates inferred from the chronosequence design itself. Mean k values arrived at via these techniques were 0.06 ± 0.03, 0.05 ± 0.04, and 0.05 ± 0.05 y−1, respectively. The four-pool model suggested that the transition rate between decay classes was 0.14–0.19 y−1; the model was most sensitive to initial CWD values. Although the computed k values implied a problem with chronosequence site selection for at least one site, the overall CWD trend was consistent with a larger number of sites surveyed in the region.

Keywords

coarse woody debris boreal forest decomposition fragmentation snag failure black spruce chronosequence 

References

  1. Alban DH, Pastor J. 1993. Decomposition of aspen, spruce, and pine boles on two sites in Minnesota. Can J For Res 23:1744–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boddy L. 1983. Carbon dioxide release from decomposing wood: effect of water content and temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 15:501–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE, Gower ST. 2007. The dominance of fire in determining carbon balance of the central Canadian boreal forest. Nature 450:89–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST, 2002a. Annual carbon flux from woody debris for a boreal black spruce fire chronosequence. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108, art. no. 8220Google Scholar
  5. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. 2002b. Leaf area dynamics of a boreal black spruce fire chronosequence. Tree Physiol 22:993–1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. 2004. Net primary production and net ecosystem production of a boreal black spruce fire chronosequence. Glob Chang Biol 10:473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulanger Y, Sirois L. 2006. Postfire dynamics of black spruce coarse woody debris in northern boreal forest of Quebec. Can J For Res 36:1770–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brais S, Paré D, Lierman C. 2006. Tree bole mineralization rates of four species of the Canadian eastern boreal forest: Implications for nutrient dynamics following stand-replacing disturbances. Can J For Res 36:2331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brais S, Sadi F, Bergeron Y, Grenier Y. 2005. Coarse woody debris dynamics in a post-fire jack pine chronosequence and its relation with site productivity. For Ecol Manage 220:216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers JQ, Schimel JP, Nobre AD. 2001. Respiration from coarse wood litter in central Amazon forests. Biogeochemistry 52:115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chueng N, Brown S. 1995. Decomposition of silver maple (Acer saccharinum L) woody debris in a central Illinois bottomland forest. Wetlands 15:232–41.Google Scholar
  12. Dunn AL, Barford CC, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML, Daube BC. 2007. A long-term record of carbon exchange in a boreal black spruce forest: means: responses to interannual variability, and decadal trends. Glob Chang Biol 13:577–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME. 1987. Tree death as an ecological process. BioScience 37:550–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garber SM, Brown JP, Wilson DS, Maguire DA, Heath LS. 2005. Snag longevity under alternative silvicultural regimes in mixed-species forests of central Maine. Can J For Res 35:787–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gough CM, Vogel CS, Kazanski C, Nagel L, Flower CE, Curtis PS. 2007. Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a north temperate forest. For Ecol Manage 244:60–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goulden ML, Winston GC, McMillan A, Litvak M, Read EL, Rocha AV, Elliot JR. 2006. An eddy covariance mesonet to measure the effect of forest age on land–atmosphere exchange. Global Chang Biol 12:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Stocks BJ, Hirsch A, Gower ST, O’Neill KP, Kasischke ES. 2000. The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Glob Chang Biol 6:174–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harmon ME, Ferrell WK, Franklin JF. 1990. Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247:699–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack Jr K, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmon ME, Krankina ON, Sexton J. 2000. Decomposition vectors: a new approach to estimating woody detritus decomposition dynamics. Can J For Res 30:76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harmon ME, Sexton J, 1996. Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. Publication No. 20. Seattle, Washington: U.S. LTER Network Office: University of Washington pp 73.Google Scholar
  22. Hély C, Bergeron Y, Flannigan MD. 2000. Coarse woody debris in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest: composition and load variations in relation to stand replacement. Can J For Res 30:674–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houghton RA, Woodwell GM. 1989. Global climatic change. Sci Am 260:36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janisch JE, Harmon ME. 2002. Successional changes in live and dead wood carbon stores: implications for net ecosystem productivity. Tree Physiol 22:77–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Janisch JE, Harmon ME, Chen H, Fasth B, Sexton J. 2005. Decomposition of coarse woody debris originating by clearcutting of an old-growth conifer forest. Écoscience 12:151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasischke ES, Christensen NLJ, Stocks BJ. 1995. Fire, global warming, and the carbon balance of boreal forests. Ecol Appl 5:437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krankina ON, Harmon ME. 1995. Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert RL, Lang GE, Reiners WA. 1980. Loss of mass and chemical change in decaying boles of a subalpine balsam fir forest. Ecology 61:1460–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee PC. 1998. Dynamics of snags in aspen-dominated midboreal forests. For Ecol Manage 105:263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee PC, Crites S, Nietfeld M, Nguyen HV, Stelfox JB. 1997. Characteristics and origins of deadwood material in aspen-dominated boreal forests. Ecol Appl 7:691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Litvak M, Miller S, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML. 2003. Effect of stand age on whole ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Canadian boreal forest. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108, art. no. 8225Google Scholar
  32. Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Siltonen J, Sievänen R. 2006. Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Ecol Appl 16:1865–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manies KL, Harden JW, Bond-Lamberty B, O’Neill KP. 2005. Woody debris along an upland chronosequence in boreal Manitoba and its impact on long-term carbon storage. Can J For Res 35:472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marra JL, Edmonds RL. 1996. Coarse woody debris and soil respiration in a clearcut on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, U.S.A. Can J For Res 26:1337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mattson KG, Swank WT, Waide JB. 1987. Decomposition of woody debris in a regenerating, clear-cut forest in the southern Appalachians. Can J For Res 17:712–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moroni MT. 2006. Disturbance history affects dead wood abundance in Newfoundland boreal forests. Can J For Res 36:3194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Næsset E. 1999. Decomposition rate constants of Picea abies logs in southeastern Norway. Can J For Res 29:372–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nalder IA, Wein RW. 1999. Long-term forest floor carbon dynamics after fire in upland boreal forests of western Canada. Global Biochem Cycles 13:951–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Post WM, Peng TH, Emanuel WR, King AW, Dale VH, DeAngelis DL. 1990. The global carbon cycle. Am Sci 78:310–26.Google Scholar
  40. Powers RF, Van Cleve K. 1991. Long-term ecological research in temperate and boreal ecosystems. Agron J 83:11–24.Google Scholar
  41. Progar RA, Schowalter TD, Freitag CM, Morrell JJ. 2000. Respiration from coarse woody debris as affected by moisture and saprotroph functional diversity Western Oregon. Oecologia 124:426–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  43. Rayner ADM, Boddy L, 1988. Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  44. Siitonen J, Martikainen PJ, Punttila P, Rauh J. 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manage 128:211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spies TA, Franklin JF, Thomas TB. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW. 1997. Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tinker DB, Knight DH. 2000. Coarse woody debris following fire and logging in Wyoming Lodgepole pine forests. Ecosystems 3:472–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanderwel MC, Malcolm JR, Smith SM. 2006. An integrated model for snag and downed woody debris decay class transitions. For Ecol Manage 234:48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang C, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST. 2002. Environmental controls on CO2 flux from black spruce coarse woody debris. Oecologia 132:374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang C, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST. 2003. Carbon distribution of a well- and poorly-drained black spruce fire chronosequence. Glob Chang Biol 9:1066–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yatskov M, Harmon ME, Krankina ON. 2003. A chronosequence of wood decomposition in the boreal forests of Russia. Can J For Res 33:1211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations