Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Drainage Size, Stream Intermittency, and Ecosystem Function in a Sonoran Desert Landscape

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the interactions between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems remains an important research focus in ecology. In arid landscapes, catchments are drained by a channel continuum that represents a potentially important driver of ecological pattern and process in the surrounding terrestrial environment. To better understand the role of drainage networks in arid landscapes, we determined how stream size influences the structure and productivity of riparian vegetation, and the accumulation of organic matter (OM) in soils beneath plants in an upper Sonoran Desert basin. Canopy volume of velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina), as well as overall plant cover, increased along lateral upland–riparian gradients, and among riparian zones adjacent to increasingly larger streams. Foliar δ13C signatures for P. velutina suggested that landscape patterns in vegetation structure reflect increases in water availability along this arid stream continuum. Leaf litter and annual grass biomass production both increased with canopy volume, and total aboveground litter production ranged from 137 g m−2 y−1 in upland habitat to 446 g m−2 y−1 in the riparian zone of the perennial stream. OM accumulation in soils beneath P. velutina increased with canopy volume across a broad range of drainage sizes; however, in the riparian zone of larger streams, flooding further modified patterns of OM storage. Drainage networks represent important determinants of vegetation structure and function in upper Sonoran Desert basins, and the extent to which streams act as sources of plant-available water and/or agents of fluvial disturbance has implications for material storage in arid soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin AT, Sala OE. 2002. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics across a natural precipitation gradient in Patagonia, Argentina. J Veg Sci 13:351–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ, Mwonga SM, Amundson RG, Duxbury JM, Ali AR. 1993. Comparative effects of isolated trees on their undercanopy environments in high- and low rainfall savannas. J Appl Ecol 30:143–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M. 2004. The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. BioScience 54:413–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix J. 1997. Flood disturbance and the distribution of riparian species diversity. Geographical Rev 87:468–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CJ, Green W. 1968. Perpetual succession of stream-channel vegetation in a semi-arid region. J Ariz Acad Sci 5:86–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Caylor KK, Scanlon TM, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2004. Feasible optimality of vegetation patterns in river basins. Geophys Res Lett 31(31):LI34502

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton SM, Grimm NB, Fisher SG. 1996. Response of hyporheic invertebrate assemblage to drying disturbance in a desert stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 15:700–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford CS, Gosz JR. 1982. Desert ecosystems: their resources in space and time. Environ Conserv 9:181–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Gido K, Whiles MR, Fritz KM, Mathews WJ. 2004. Life on the edge: the ecology of Great Plains prairie streams. Bioscience 54:205–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer JR, Cooper TA. 1988. Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants. Oecologia 76:562–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer JR, Phillips SL, Schuster WSF, Sandquist DR. 1991. Differential utilization of summer rains by desert plants. Oecologia 88:430–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli J, Brock DJ. 2000. Patch dynamics in arid lands: localized effects of Acacia papyrocarpa on soils and vegetation of open woodlands of south Australia. Ecography 23:479–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SG, Welter J, Schade J, Henry J. 2001. Landscape challenges to ecosystem thinking: creative flood and drought in the American Southwest. In: Gili JM, Pretus JL, Packard TT, Eds. A marine science odyssey into the 21st century. Scienta Marina 65(2):181–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB. 2004. Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85:2369–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf WL. 1985. The Colorado River: instability and basin management. Washington D.C.: American Association of Geographers

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf WL. 1988. Fluvial processes in dryland rivers. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner MJ, Stanford JA. 2003. Differences in cottonwood growth between a losing and gaining reach of an alluvial floodplain. Ecology 84:1453–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hupp CR. 1992. Riparian vegetation patterns following channelization: a geomorphic perspective. Ecology 73:1209–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN. 1975. The stream and its valley. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, Verhandlungen 19:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazaei E, Spink AEF, Warner JW. 2003. A catchment water balance model for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions of south-east Iran. Hydrogeol J 11:333–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold L. 1994. A view of the river. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. p 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, McIntyre S, Lance C. 1988. Erosion and deposition in a forest/field system estimated using cesium-137 activity. J Soil Water Conserv 43:195–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA. 1987. Primary productivity in arid lands: myths and realities. J Arid Environ 13:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA, Wiens JA, Tongway DJ. 2000. A scaling rule for landscape patches and how it applies to conserving soil resources in savannas. Ecosystems 3:84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Malanson GP. 1993. Riparian landscapes. Cambridge (UK): University Press. p 293

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Yrizar A, Nunez S, Miranda H, Burquez A. 1999. Temporal and spatial variation of litter production in Sonoran Desert communities. Plant Ecol 145:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe JR. 1994. Landscape evolution, soil formation, and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran Desert bajadas. Ecol Monogr 64:111–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Bombios D, Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York (NY): Wiley. p 547

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I. 1973 Desert ecosystems: enviornment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Wainwright J, Stone PM, Abrahams AD. 1999. Transmission losses in rills on dryland hillslopes. Hydrol Processes 13:2897–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Dietrich WE. 2002. Food webs in river networks. Ecol Rese 17:451–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Virginia RA, Kemp PR, de Soyza AG, Tremmel DC. 1999. Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecol Monogr 69:69–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade JD, Sponseller RA, Collins SL, Stiles A. 2003. The influence of Mesquite canopies on understory vegetation: effects of landscape position. J Veg Sci 14:743–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade JD, Hobbie SE. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation in islands of fertility in the Sonoran Desert. Biogeochemistry 73:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Jones CS. 1984. The comparative importance of overland runoff and mean annual rainfall to shrub communities of the Mojave Desert. Bot Gaz 145:116–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AF. 1996. On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Pilmanis A. 1998. Plant–soil interactions in deserts. Biogoechemistry 42:169–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi MR, Nilsen ET, Rundel PW. 1982. Biomass and net primary production of Prosopis glandulosa (Fabaceae) in the Sonoran Desert of California. Am J Bot 69:760–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder KA, Williams DG. 2000. Water sources used by riparian trees varies among stream types on the San Pedro River, Arizona. Agric Forest Meteorol 105:227–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH. 1993. Drying disturbance and stability in a desert stream ecosystem. Dissertation, Arizona State University

  • Stanley EH, Fisher SG, Grimm NB. 1997. Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. Bioscience 47:427–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger J, Gurnell AM, Petts GE. 2001. Sediment deposition along the channel margins of a reach of the Middle River Severn, UK. Regul Rivers Res Manage 17:443–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GR, Turnbull MH, Schmidt S, Erskine PD. 1995. 13C Natural abundance in plant communities along a rainfall gradient: a biological integrator of water availability. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Patten DT, Richter BD. 1991. Flood flows and dynamics of Sonoran riparian forests. Rivers 2:221–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Wilkins SD, Tress JA. 1993. Vegetation-hydrology models: implications for management of Prosopis velutina (velvet mesquite) riparian ecosystems. Ecol Appl 3:307–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen BW, Schumann HH. 1968. The Sycamore Creek watershed, Maricopa County, Arizona. Washington, D.C.: Water Supply Paper 1861, United States Geological Survey

  • Thorne MS, Skinner QD, Smith MA, Rogers JD, Laylock WA, Cerekci SA. 2002. Evaluation of a technique for measuring canopy volume of shrubs. J Range Manage 55:235–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW, Knox JC. 1984. Comment on “Erosion, redeposition, and delivery of sediment to Midwestern streams” by D.C. Wilkin and S.J. Hebel. Water Resour Res 20:1317–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia RA, Jarell WM. 1983. Soil properties in a mesquite-dominated Sonoran desert ecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:138–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright J, Parsons AJ, Schlesinger WH, Abrahams AD. 2002. Hydrology-vegetation interactions in areas of discontinuous flow on a semi-arid bajada, Southern New Mexico. J Arid Environ 51:319–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter JR. 2004. Nitrogen transport and processing in the intermittent drainage network: linking terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Dissertation, Arizona State University

  • Whitford WG. 2002. Ecology of desert systems. London (UK): Academic. p 343

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavitt JB, Smith L. 1983. Spatial patterns of mesquite and associated herbaceous species in an Arizona desert grassland. Am Midl Nat 109:98–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF DEB 0075650, to SGF), and the Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Program (# 91613101, to RAS). Sam Norlin, Jim Heffernan, and John Schade provided assistance in the field and/or lab. Comments by David Lewis, Jim Heffernan, and two anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA

    Ryan A. Sponseller & Stuart G. Fisher

Authors
  1. Ryan A. Sponseller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart G. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan A. Sponseller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sponseller, R.A., Fisher, S.G. Drainage Size, Stream Intermittency, and Ecosystem Function in a Sonoran Desert Landscape. Ecosystems 9, 344–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0167-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0167-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation