Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting vehicle exhaust emissions, driver motivations as a mediator

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing the negative effects of vehicle emissions is one of the main priorities for governments worldwide. Comprehensive understanding of the costs and impacts associated with emissions would help government decision makers establish policies that allow their citizens to make decisions to reduce vehicle use externalities and maximize the overall benefits to government and society. Countries worldwide have pre-set goals regarding maximum average emissions. However, these goals are nearly impossible to realize without market interventions. Therefore, many governments have introduced taxes to guide people towards reducing vehicle emissions. The purpose of this study was to explore the mediating role of driver motivations in the effect of the following tax-related emission factors on vehicle exhaust emissions: (progressive engine size tax, progressive vehicle emissions tax, progressive vehicle age tax, and progressive vehicle kilometres travelled tax). The study used a quantitative approach of two questionnaires-one paper-based and one internet-based-to collect primary data. Smart PLS 3.2.7 was then used to analyse the data. The study found that the progressive taxes on engine size, vehicle age, and vehicle emissions, if imposed, will increase driver motivations to buy vehicles with smaller engines, replace or maintain old polluting vehicles, or fix vehicle emission problems. This study contributes to the literature by achieving its theoretical and practical objectives of providing a clear message to governmental practitioners and any related bodies that progressive taxes can increase driver motivations to reduce vehicle emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ab Hamid MR, Sami W, Sidek MM (2017) Discriminant validity assessment: use of fornell and larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J Phys Conf Ser 890(1):012163

    Google Scholar 

  • Abranovic WA (1997) Statistical thinking and data analysis methods for managers. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Acutt MZ, Dodgson JS (1997) Controlling the environmental impacts of transport: matching instruments to objectives. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9209(96)00012-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn K (2002) Modeling light duty vehicle emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech)

  • Alemanno A, Gabbi S (2016) Foundations of EU food law and policy: Ten years of the European food safety authority. Routledge.‏ ISBN:9781317133681

  • Almutairi H (2013) Carbon tax based on the emission factor.‏ (Doctoral dissertation. University of Waterloo)

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashiabor H, Kreiser L, Sirisom J, Milne JE (eds) (2011) Environmental taxation in China and Asia-Pacific: achieving environmental sustainability through fiscal policy, vol 9. Edward Elgar Publishing.‏ ISBN: 9780857937759

  • Austin D (2008) Effects of gasoline prices on driving behavior and vehicle markets. Congressional Budget Office. ISBN: 9780160799310

  • Babbie ER (1990) Survey research methods, vol 3. Wadsworth Publication Company, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne C (2003) Measuring quality units: considerations in choosing mandatory questions. In: Evaluations and assessment conference: a commitment to quality, University of South Australia, Adelaide, pp 24–25

  • Bamberg S (2003) How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J Environ Psychol 23(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandivadekar AP (2008) Evaluating the impact of advanced vehicle and fuel technologies in US light-duty vehicle fleet (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University)

  • Baporikar N (ed) (2017) Global practices in knowledge management for Societal and Organizational Development. IGI Global

  • Barclay D, Higgings C, Thompson R (1994) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies, 2: 285–309, 1995. Hypothesis Testing. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 57:185–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bareit M (2016) Essays in Applied Microeconomics-An Analysis of Policy Measures in the Swiss Road Transport Sector (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich)

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron S, Zacharias G, Muralidharan R, Lancraft R (1980) PROCRU: a model for analyzing flight crew procedures in approach to landing. NASA CR-152397. Document ID 19800024582

  • Baveye J, Valenduc C (2011) Are “environmental” tax incentives efficient? Bull Documentation 139–166

  • Beder S (1996) Charging the earth: the promotion of price-based measures for pollution control. Ecol Econ 16(1):51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev Econ Stud 70(3):489–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM, Speckart G (1979) Models of attitude–behavior relations. Psychol Rev 86(5):452

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernotaite Z (2013) Importance of motivational factors among young employees in the service sector.‏ (Master's thesis, Copenhagen Business School)

  • Beydoun M (2004) Vehicular characteristics and urban air pollution: socioeconomic and environmental policy issues (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University)

  • Bhakar SS, Bhakar S, Bhakar S, Sharma G (2012) The impact of co-branding on customer evaluation of brand extension. Prestige Int J Manag IT Sanchayan 1(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin O, Martins-Filho C (2008) Vehicle price and hydrocarbon emissions: evidence from the used-vehicle markets. Appl Econ Lett 15(12):939–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600972303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borhan MN, Syamsunur D, Mohd Akhir N, Mat Yazid MR, Ismail A, Rahmat RA (2014) Predicting the use of public transportation: a case study from Putrajaya, Malaysia. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/784145 (Article ID784145)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borken-Kleefeld J (2013) Guidance note about on-road vehicle emissions remote sensing. International Council on Clean Transportation, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick S (2015) The potential for'green'fiscal policy measures to influence individuals' vehicle purchasing decisions in Scotland (Doctoral dissertation, Edinburgh Napier University)

  • Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (2002) Environmental taxation and regulation. In: Handbook of public economics, vol 3. Elsevier, pp 1471–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80027-1

  • Box CNU (2006) What is environmental economics?

  • Burton K (2012) A study of motivation: how to get your employees moving. Management 3(2):232–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue PC, Carpignano A, Vivalda C (1993) A dynamic reliability technique for error assessment in man-machine systems. Int J Man Mach Stud 38:403–428. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calitz E, Wallace S, Burrows LR (2013) The impact of tax incentives to stimulate investment in South Africa.‏ A working paper of the Department of Economics and the Bureau for Economic Research at the University of Stellenbosch

  • Carrese S, Gemma A, La Spada S (2013) Impacts of driving behaviours, slope and vehicle load factor on bus fuel consumption and emissions: a real case study in the city of Rome. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 87:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll-Larson J, Caplan AJ (2007) Estimating the effectiveness of a vehicle miles traveled tax in reducing particulate matter (PM2.5) Emissions. Economics Research Institute Study Paper, 1, 1. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eri/333

  • Carroll-Larson J, Caplan AJ (2009) Estimating the effectiveness of a vehicle miles traveled tax in reducing particulate matter emissions. J Environ Plan Manag 52:315–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802703223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal P (2012) Progressive environmental taxation: a defence. Political Stud 60(2):419–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00924.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiani M, Stohl A, Eckhardt S (2013) The dispersion characteristics of air pollution from the world’s megacities. Atmos Chem Phys 13(19):9975–9996. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9975-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YK (2012) The progressivity of the Malaysian personal income tax system. Kajian Malays J Malays Stud 30(2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy AY (2005) Defining motivation: perspectives from early childhood educators (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i)‏

  • Christiansen V, Smith S (2012) Externality-correcting taxes and regulation. Scand J Econ 114(2):358–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01701.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaschini M, Pretaroli R, Severini F, Soccia C (2011) Environmental progressive tax reform through a dynamic general equilibrium analysis. In: 19th international input–output conference, pp 13–17

  • Clotfelter CT (1983) Tax evasion and tax rates: an analysis of individual returns. Rev Econ Stat 65(3):363–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell KYH, Kozar JM (2014) Environmentally sustainable clothing consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In: Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing. Springer, Singapore, pp 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-110-7_2

  • Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Measur 60(6):821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W (2013) Revenue law essentials, 3rd edn. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford I, Smith S (1995) Fiscal instruments for air pollution abatement in road transport. J Transp Econ Policy 29(1):33–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20053059

  • Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. ISBN: 9781483321479

  • Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52(4):281

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp RP (2002) Per Mile emissions taxes and lump sum emissions taxes: a comparative study using a mathematical approach to demand estimation. (Doctoral Dissertations, University of Tennessee-Knoxville). https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2102

  • De Leeuw ED (2005) To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. J Off Stat 21(5):233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Reza JR, García-Alcaraz JL, Martínez-Loya V, Avelar-Sosa L, Jiménez-Macías E, Blanco-Fernández J (2018) Impact of infrastructure and production processes on rioja wine supply chain performance. Sustainability 10(1):103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommeyer CJ, Baum P, Hanna RW, Chapman KS (2004) Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assess Eval High Educ 29(5):611–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930410001689171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan N (2015) The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on cognitive performance in humans. Huron Univ Coll J Learn Motiv 53(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflot L (2012) Urbanization Policy in Malaysia and its Impacts. McGill University, Montreal. https://graphitepublications.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/Urbanization-Policy-in-Malaysia-and-its-Impacts.pdf

  • Echeverría J (2000) The environmental effects of tax differentiation by vehicle characteristics: results from Costa Rica (No. 34). IIED

  • EEA (1996) Environmental taxes implementation and environmental effectiveness. European Environment Agency, Environmental Issues Series No. 1. Copenhagen. https://www.geota.pt/rfa/docs/gt.pdf

  • EEA-European Energy Association (2000) Environmental taxes: recent developments in tools for integration (Environmental Issues Series No. 18). EEA, Copenhagem

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett JO, Hennig CJ, Nichols N (2008) Contemporary tax practice: research, planning and strategies, 4th edn. CCH

  • Faiz A, Weaver CS, Walsh MP (1996) Air pollution from motor vehicles: standards and technologies for controlling emissions. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press, Akron

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows RF, Liu AM (2015) Research methods for construction, vol 4. Wiley, New York (ISBN: 9781118915738)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara I, Serret Y (2008) Household behaviour and the environment, reviewing the evidence. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp 153–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Field BC, Olewiler ND (2011) Environmental economics, 3rd Canadian. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Whitby (ISBN: 978-0-07-098998-6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipczyk J, Kutrzyk-Nykiel A (2010) The influence of the vehicle age on the calculated probability of exceeding the standardised exhaust emission. J KONES 17:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham JE (2008) Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. Am J Pharm Educ 72(2):43

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer V (2015) Curb your enthusiasm for Pigovian taxes. Vand L Rev 68:1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer H, Tietenberg T (2005) The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2:1–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (ed) (2002) Valuing Nature? Economics, ethics and environment. Routledge, Abingdon (ISBN: 9781134751778)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler FJ (2002) Survey research methods. SAGE, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall-Hughes J (2014) The theory, principles and management of taxation: an introduction. 1st edn. Routledge

  • Fullerton D (ed) (2017) Distributional effects of environmental and energy policy. Routledge, The International Library of Environmental Economics and Policy, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton D, Karney DH (2010) Combinations of instruments to achieve low-carbon vehicle-miles (No. 2010-7). OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Paper

  • Fullerton D, West SE (2003) Public finance solutions to vehicle emissions problems in California.‏ p 51

  • Fullerton D, Gan L, Hattori M (2004) A model to evaluate vehicle emission incentive policies in Japan. Department of Economics University of Texas at Austin

  • Fullerton D, Gan L, Hattori M (2015) A model to evaluate vehicle emission incentive policies in Japan. Environ Econ Policy Stud 17(1):79–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans J, King S, Stonecash R, Mankiw NG (2011) Principles of economics, 5th edn. Cengage Learning

  • García-Alcaraz JL, Alor-Hernández G, Maldonado-Macías AA, Sánchez-Ramírez C (eds) (2018) New perspectives on applied industrial tools and techniques. Springer International Publishing, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 16(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Long R, Chen H, Yue T, Li W, Li Q (2017) Exploring multiple motivations on urban residents’ travel mode choices: an empirical study from Jiangsu province in China. Sustainability 9(1):136

    Google Scholar 

  • Giblin S, McNabola A (2009) Modelling the impacts of a carbon emission-differentiated vehicle tax system on CO2 emissions intensity from new vehicle purchases in Ireland. Energy Policy 37(4):1404–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell G (2017) Be who you ought or be who you are? Environmental framing and cognitive dissonance in going paperless. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment (269).

  • Greer W (2013) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Abraham Lincoln as an adult learner. Masters Theses. Western Kentucky University

  • Gregory M (1979) Economic analysis of environmental issues. Economics of the Environment, Blackie: Glasgow. https://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/publications/textbooks/JHtext_ch03.pdf

  • Haas R, Wietschel M, Kloess DIM (2011) Potentials of hybrid and electric cars to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in passenger car transport: techno-economic assessment and model-based scenarios. (Doctoral dissertation, Technischen Universität Wien)

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2013) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (ISBN: 9781483321455)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Thomas G, Hult M, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publication Inc, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (ISBN: 9781483321455)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Babin BJ, Krey N (2017) Covariance-based structural equation modeling. J Advert Rev Recomm 46(1):163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Halls AS (2005) Guidelines for designing data collection and sharing systems for co-managed fisheries: technical guidelines. Food & Agriculture Org. ISBN: 9789251054109

  • Hansen H (2015) A more perfect user fee: examining the viability of a vehicle miles traveled fee as an alternative to the gas tax. All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. Paper 672

  • Harrington W (1997) Fuel economy and motor vehicle emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 33(3):240–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington W, McConnell VD (2003) Motor vehicles and the environment. Washington, DC. Resources for the Future. www.rff.org

  • Harrington W, Walls MA, McConnell VD (1994) Using economic incentives to reduce auto pollution. Issues Sci Technol 11(2):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss L (1985) Taxation, incentives and disincentives, and human motivation. Am J Econ Sociol 44(2):129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey G, Deakin E (1998) The STEP analysis package: description and application examples. Technical methods for analyzing pricing measures to reduce transportation emissions

  • Hatch MT (ed) (2012) Environmental policymaking: assessing the use of alternative policy instruments. SUNY Press, Albany (ISBN: 9780791463475)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi Y, Kato H, Teodoro RVR (2001) A model system for the assessment of the effects of car and fuel green taxes on CO2 emission. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 6(2):123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9209(00)00021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Bandivadekar A (2011) A review and comparative analysis of fiscal policies associated with new passenger vehicle CO. International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), 1225. www.theicct.org

  • Heine D, Norregaard, J, Parry I (2012) Environmental tax reform: principles from theory and practice to date. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Paper WP/12/180. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2169725

  • Hennessy H, Tol RS (2011) The impact of tax reform on new car purchases in Ireland. Energy Policy 39(11):7059–7067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: New challenges to international marketing, pp 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R (1998) What sample size is “enough” in internet survey research. Interpers Comput Technol Electron J 21st Century 6(3–4):1–12

  • Hinnells M, Potter S, Centre for Reform London (United Kingdom) (2001) Don't Tax More, Tax Different!: a tax paradigm for sustainability. Centre for Reform

  • Hirota K, Poot J (2003) Do policy incentives affect the environmental impact of private car use? Evidence from a sample of large cities, 43rd congress of the European Regional Science Association: peripheries, centres, and spatial development in the new Europe, Jyväskylä, Finland, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/116212

  • Hoel M (2010) Is there a green paradox? CESifo Working Paper, No. 3168, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/46477

  • Hofmann E, Hoelzl E, Kirchler E (2008) Preconditions of voluntary tax compliance: knowledge and evaluation of taxation, norms, fairness, and motivation to cooperate. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychol 216(4):209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman DC (2005) Driving up the cost of clean air. Environ Health. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.113-a246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton RB, Markley F (1991) The effects of incentives on environment-friendly behaviors: a case study. ACR N Am Adv 18(1):697–702

  • Hruška Z, Dvořáková L (2014) The carbon tax in the context of global and local economy. ISBN: 978-960-474-360-5

  • Huo H, Zhang Q, He K, Yao Z, Wang M (2012) Vehicle-use intensity in China: current status and future trend. Energy Policy 43:6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • ICCT (2016) A baseline analysis of the Turkish vehicle market. The Internationa Council of Clean Transportation. https://www.theicct.org/blogs/staff/baseline-analysis-turkish-vehicle-market

  • Innes JE (1996) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 62(4):460–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James S (ed) (2002) Taxation: critical perspectives on the world economy, vol 4. Taylor & Francis, USA

  • Jiang X (2012) Legal issues for implementing the clean development mechanism in China. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (ISBN: 9783642247378)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi Y, Rahman Z (2015) Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. Int Strateg Manag Rev 3(1–2):128–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Risbud S (2012) Magic molecules. Adv Life Sci 1(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsoni V, Velander K (2018) Innovative approaches to tourism and leisure. In: Fourth international conference IACuDiT, Athens 2017, vol 98. Springer

  • Kesner-Škreb M (2002) Tax policy and economic growth. Croat Econ Surv 4:145–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler J, Schroeer W (1995) Meeting mobility and air quality goals: strategies that work. Transportation 22(3):241–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01099472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyvanfar A, Shafaghat A, Muhammad NZ, Ferwati MS (2018) Driving behaviour and sustainable mobility—policies and approaches revisited. Sustainability 10(4):1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazzoom JD (1991) The impact of a gasoline tax on auto exhaust emissions. J Policy Anal Manag 10(3):434–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Kian TS, Yusoff WFW (2015) Intrinsic–extrinsic motivation revisited: exploring their definitions. Int J Manag Sci 6(3):136–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne WE, Beckmann SC (1998) Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. J Market Manag 14(6):513–532. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725798784867716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MK (2011) Does the Green Light from the Government Really Mean" Go"? Challenges Associated with Canadian Tax Instruments on Renewable Energy Development (Doctoral dissertation).‏ University of Toronto

  • Kirstein M (2010) The role of motivation in human resource management: importance of motivation factors among future business persons. A master‘s dissertation, Aarhus University‏

  • Klein POG (2014) European car taxes and the CO2 intensity of new cars.‏ (Master Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Klier T, Linn J (2015) Using taxes to reduce carbon dioxide emissions rates of new passenger vehicles: evidence from France, Germany, and Sweden. Am Econ J Econ Policy 7(1):212–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurabayashi T, Niimi Y, Yatsunami S (2013) Understanding ASEAN consumer markets through country-specific questionnaires. Nomura Research Institute, NRI paper No.192, 1–13

  • Lau CYJ (2010) Characterization of on-road vehicle emissions and air quality in densely-built environment (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Lehman C, McLoughlin K, Dewhurst M (2003) Assessing the impact of graduated vehicle excise duty: quantitative report. Department for Transport, UK. https://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/research/consumerbehaviour/assessingtheimpactofgraduate3817

  • Leicester A (2006) The UK tax system and the environment (No. R68). IFS Reports, Institute for Fiscal Studies

  • Leicester A (2013) Environmental taxes: economic principles and the UK experience.‏ ISBN: 9788415664284

  • MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 58:593–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins A (2011) An assessment of recent trends on income taxation and environmental policy in Portugal. Manag Environ Qual Int J 22(4):418–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew TV (2014) Fuel consumption and emission studies. Transportation systems engineering. IIT Bombay, Mumbai, pp 1–25

  • Mazumder DB (2007) Essays in vehicle emission policies. ProQuest. ISBN: 9780549266488

  • Metcalf GE, Weisbach D (2009) The design of a carbon tax. Harv Envtl L Rev 33:499

    Google Scholar 

  • Methipara J (2010) Vehicle demand responses of green vehicle taxation policies and increased gasoline prices (Doctoral dissertation)‏

  • Mirrlees JA (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev Econ Stud 38:175–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees JA, Adam S (2010) Dimensions of tax design: the Mirrlees review. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesReview

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees J, Adam S (2011) Tax by design: the mirrlees review, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford (ISBN: 978-0-19-955374-7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AA, Shakir AA (2013) Factors that affect transport mode preference for graduate students in the National University of Malaysia by Logit method. J Eng Sci Technol 8(3):351–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohdali R, Isa K, Yusoff SH (2014) The impact of threat of punishment on tax compliance and non-compliance attitudes in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 164:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore K, Cassel SL (2011) Techniques for college writing: the thesis statement and beyond. Nelson Education, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosa IA, Ramiah V (2014) The Costs and benefits of environmental regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (ISBN: 9781782549246)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore A (2015) The use of economic instruments in managing the environmental externalities of road transport.‏ (Doctor of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Australia)

  • Mukherjee S (2002) Modern economic theory. New Age International

  • Mukhopadhyay K, Thomassin PJ (2009) Economic and environmental impact of free trade in East and South East Asia. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3507-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa M, Rusli MHM (2016) The position of environmental law in Malaysia in dealing with domestic and regional air pollution problems. Jurnal sultan alauddin sulaiman shah. VOL 3 BIL 2 (2016). https://journal.kuis.edu.my/jsass/images/files5/jsass_vol3bil2_012_MAIZATUN.pdf

  • Musti S, Kockelman KM (2011) Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 45(8):707–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair CS, Wayland C, Soediro S (2005) Evaluating the student experience: a leap into the future. In: Evaluation Forum 2005, vol 25

  • Nel R, Nienaber G (2012a) Vehicle emissions tax-just another tax or a win for the environment? TAXtalk 2012(35): 6–9. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC122335

  • Nel R, Nienaber G (2012b) Tax design to reduce passenger vehicle CO2 emissions. Meditari Account Res 20(1):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222521211234219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel R, Du Plooy J (2013) The role of tax incentives in reducing CO2 emissions-evidence from vehicle manufacturers. Int Bus Econ Res J (Online) 12(5):551

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura E (2011) Assessing the fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of future light-duty vehicles in Japan (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)‏

  • Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2002) Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environ Behav 34(6):740–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nulty DD (2008) The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval High Educ 33(3):301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) OECD environmental performance reviews OECD environmental performance reviews: Greece 2000. OECD Publishing, Paris (ISBN: 9789264181137)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) Economic surveys: Belgium 2003. OECD Publishing, Paris (ISBN:9789264199774)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Taxation, innovation and the environment. OECD Publishing, Paris (ISBN: 9789264087637)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Environmental Taxation. A Guide for Policy Makers. https://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/48164926.pdf

  • OECD (2015) OECD Economic surveys. OECD, Latvia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogier J (2005) The response rates for online surveys-a hit and miss affair. University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Okunola OJ, Uzairu A, Gimba CE, Ndukwe GI (2012) Assessment of gaseous pollutants along high traffic roads in Kano, Nigeria. Int J Environ Sustain 1(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantano E (ed) (2015) Successful technological integration for competitive advantage in retail settings. IGI Global. ISBN: 9781466682986

  • Parry IW (2011) Reforming the tax system to promote environmental objectives: an application to mauritius (no. 11–124). International Monetary Fund

  • Parry I, Small KA (2015) Implications of carbon taxes for transportation policies. Implementing a US Carbon Tax: Challenges and Debates, 211

  • Parry IW, Walls M, Harrington W (2007) Automobile externalities and policies. J Econ Lit 45(2):373–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/den.45.2.373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchen M (2006) Public attitudes and behavior about climate change. What shapes them and how to influence them. Indiana: Purdue Climate Change Research Center. outreach publication, 601.

  • Paul J, Wahlberg K (2002) Global taxes for global priorities. In: Global Policy Forum. (WEED). https://umich.edu/~spp638/Coursepack/fin-globaltaxes.pdf

  • Pigou AC (1932) The Economics of Welfare, (London: McMillan & Co.) Part IV

  • Potter S, Parkhurst G, Ubbels B, Peeters P, Enoch MP (2004) Taxation futures for sustainable mobility: final report to the ESRC. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. https://www.psi.org.uk/ehb/projectspotter.html

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36(4):717–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) (2010) Appetite for change: global business perspectives on tax and regulation for a low carbon economy. https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/appetite-for-change.pdf

  • Radhakrishna RB (2007) Tips for developing and testing questionnaires/instruments. J Ext 45(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman SM, Al-Ahmadi HM (2010) Evaluation of transportation demand management (TDM) strategies and its prospect in Saudi Arabia. Jordan J Civ Eng (JJCE) 4:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise SP, Revicki DA (eds) (2014) Handbook of item response theory modeling: applications to typical performance assessment. Routledge, Abingdon (ISBN: 9781317565703)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenberg L, Tregarthen TD (2009) Principles of microeconomics. Flat World Knowledge.‏ ISBN: 9780982043035

  • Roscoe JT (1975) Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences, vol 265. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (2011) Economic controversies, 1st edn. Ludwig von Mises Institute

  • Rovai AP, Baker JD, Ponton MK (2013) Social science research design and statistics: a practitioner's guide to research methods and IBM SPSS. Watertree Press LLC. ISBN: 9780978718688

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25(1):54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan L, Ferreira S, Convery F (2009) The impact of fiscal and other measures on new passenger car sales and CO2 emissions intensity: evidence from Europe. Energy Econ 31(3):365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SK, Beig G, Parkhi N (2014) Critical emissions from the largest on-road transport network in South Asia. Aerosol Air Quality Res 14(1):135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahudin SN, Abdullah MM, Newaz NA (2013) Emissions: sources, policies and development in Malaysia. Int J Educ Res 1(7):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Samad G, Manzoor R (2011) Green growth: an environmental technology approach. Pak Dev Rev 50(4II):471–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhanamery T, Ramayah T (2015) The mediating effect of perceived usefulness towards tax service quality and the continuance usage intention of the filing system in Malaysia. In: International conference on E-Commerce (ICoEC). Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

  • Santos G, Behrendt H, Maconi L, Shirvani T, Teytelboym A (2010) Part I: externalities and economic policies in road transport. Res Transp Econ 28(1):2–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D, Reams R, Hair JF Jr (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J Fam Bus Strategy 5(1):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöb R (2005) The double dividend hypothesis of environmental taxes: a survey. Int Yearb Environ Resour Econ 2006:223–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (2003) Research methods for business: a skill-bulding approach. Willey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (2010) Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U, Bougie R (2016) Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Wiley, New York (ISBN: 9781119165552)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman ER (1893) The theory of progressive taxation. Political Sci Q 8(2):220–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman ERA (1908) Progressive taxation in theory and practice. Am Econ Assoc Quar 1–334

  • Shabadin A, Johari NM, Jamil HM (2017) Car annual vehicle kilometer travelled estimated from car manufacturer data—an improved method. Pertanika J Sci Technol 25(1):171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish WR, Sweeney RB (1991) Mediators and moderators in meta-analysis: there’s a reason we don’t let dodo birds tell us which psychotherapies should have prizes. J Consult Clin Psychol 59(6):883–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2011) Corrective taxation versus liability as a solution to the problem of harmful externalities. J Law Econ 54(S4):S249–S266

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit TGJ (2016) What is known about the influence of CO2 differentiated vehicle taxes on car sales in the EU? (Master's thesis, University of Twente)

  • Soares CD (2011) The design features of environmental taxes (Doctoral dissertation, M.Phil. thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science, Reino Unido, disponível em https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/368)

  • Spence A, Venables D, Pidgeon N, Poortinga W, Demski C (2010) Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: summary findings of a survey conducted in January–March 2010. Understanding Risk Group. https://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/final_report.pdf

  • Strang K (ed) (2015) The Palgrave handbook of research design in business and management. Springer, Berlin (ISBN: 9781137484956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim JK, Clayton S, Howard GS (2011) Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. Am Psychol 66(4):251

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott WJ (2010) Human rights and human well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford (ISBN: 9780199813193)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Thongrattana PT (2010) Assessing reliability and validity of a measurement instrument for studying uncertain factors in Thai rice supply chain

  • Uwalomwa U, Ranti UO, Francis I (2015) The role of environmental tax in flood reduction: a study of Lagos State “Nigeria.” J S Afr Bus Res 2015:11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.645670 (Article ID 645670)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaa T (2007) Modelling driver behaviour on basis of emotions and feelings: intelligent transport systems and behavioural adaptations. In: Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments. Springer, London, pp 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_12

  • Walls M, Hanson J (1999) Distributional aspects of an environmental tax shift: the case of motor vehicle emissions taxes. Natl Tax J 52(1):53–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41789375

  • Walsh M, Shah JJ (1997) Clean fuels for Asia: technical options for moving toward unleaded gasoline and low-sulfur diesel. The World Bank.‏ ISBN: 9780821340332

  • Wang J, Ge C, Gao S, Zhao Y (2005) Design on the framework of china environmental taxation policy and its implementation strategy. In: Paper based on a project funded by National Key Researches Program by Chinese Government

  • Watt S, Simpson C, McKillop C, Nunn V (2002) Electronic course surveys: does automating feedback and reporting give better results? Assess Eval Higher Educ 27(4):325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000001346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werren KA (2015) Utilising taxation incentives to promote private sector funded conservation. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Law, University of Western Sydney. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:34692

  • West SE (2004) Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies. J Public Econ 88(3):735–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00186-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West SE (2005) Equity implications of vehicle emissions taxes. J Transp Econ Policy 39(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Van Oppen C (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q 33(1):177–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi C, Yun W (2015) The impact of tax policy stimulus on automobile choice-evidence from Chinese automobile industry. Afr J Bus Manag 9(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Ju H (2014) Market equilibrium and the environmental effects of tax adjustments in China’s automobile industry. Rev Econ Stat 96(2):306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhakit S (1974) A note on income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. J Public Econ 3:201–202

  • Zakaria R (2014) Partial least squares modelling of attitudes of students towards learning statistics. J Qual Meas Anal JQMA 10(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhi C, Ma F (2015) The impact of CO2 tax: a simulation analysis for the Norwegian petroleum sector (Master's thesis).‏ Norwegian school of Economics

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Administration and Economic College, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq

    Yasser A. Al-Rawi

  2. School of Business Innovation and Technopreneurship, University Malaysia Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia

    Mohammed Harith Imlus

  3. School of Industrial Technology, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

    Yusri Yusup

  4. School of Business, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

    Sofri Bin Yahya

Authors
  1. Yasser A. Al-Rawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed Harith Imlus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusri Yusup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sofri Bin Yahya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasser A. Al-Rawi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Rawi, Y.A., Imlus, M.H., Yusup, Y. et al. Factors affecting vehicle exhaust emissions, driver motivations as a mediator. Environ Econ Policy Stud 23, 361–407 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00291-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00291-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation