Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 261–286 | Cite as

Dynamic optimal joint policies for tourism promotion and environmental restoration

  • Phumthan Sirilersuang
  • Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin
Research Article


Policies regarding tourism management can be separated into (1) tourism promotion policies and (2) environmental restoration policies. Because of the close relationship between the number of visitors and environmental quality, both policy types should be jointly designed and implemented. This paper studies the optimal use of these two policies in tourism management. In the case of Khao Laem Ya–Mu Koh Samet National Park in Thailand, the optimal policy balance requires the substantially higher restoration expenditure than the promotion expenditure at all time. With optimal policy balance, the number of visitors at the steady state increases more than twice, whereas the water quality remains unchanged. The implementation of the optimal policy balance would yield an additional benefit in terms of net present value of approximately $120 million over 50 years. The results from sensitivity analysis affirm the importance of restoration over promotion policy and suggest that improving effectiveness of restoration expenditure and reducing visitor impact on environmental quality can significantly increase benefits from tourism.


Optimal joint policies Tourism management Promotion policy Restoration policy Optimal control 

JEL Classification

Q57 Q58 C61 



This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies. We would like to sincerely thank Kimberly Burnett (University of Hawaii) for comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors, however, are our own.


  1. Bestard AB, Nadal JR (2007) Modelling environmental attitudes toward tourism. Tour Manag 28(3):688–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briguglio L, Butler R, Harrison D, Filho WL (1996) Sustainable tourism in islands and small states: case studies. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnett KM et al (2008) Beyond the lamppost: optimal prevention and control of the Brown Tree Snake in Hawaii. Ecol Econ 67(1):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler R (1980) The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: implication for management of resources. Can Geogr 24(1):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casagrandi R, Rinaldi S (2002) A theoretical approach to tourism sustainability. Conservation Ecology. Accessed on 31 January 2012
  6. Cater E (1995) Environmental contradictions in sustainable tourism. Geogr J 161(1):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Tourism (2014) Visitor Statistic 2013 (in Thai). Accessed on 13 January 2015
  8. Farr H, Rogers A (1994) Tourism and the environment on the isles of scilly: conflict and complementary. Landsc Urban Plan 29(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greiner A et al (2001) Optimal periodic development of a pollution generating tourism industry. Eur J Oper Res 134(3):582–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartwick JM, Olewiler ND (1986) The economics of natural resource use. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansangthong I (2005) Factors relating to the behavior of Thai tourists: a case study of Koh Samed, Rayong Province. Master Thesis. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnston RJ, Tyrella T (2005) A dynamic model of sustainable tourism. J Travel Res 44(2):124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kocasoy G, Mutlu HI, Alagöz AZ (2008) Prevention of marine environment pollution at the tourism regions by the application of a simple method for the domestic wastewater. Desalination 226(1–3):21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kort PM et al (2002) Environmental effects of tourism industry investments: an inter-temporal trade-off. Optim Control Appl Methods 23(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacitignola D, Petrosillo I, Cataldi M, Zurlini G (2007) Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability. Ecol Model 206(1–2):191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department (2011) Tourist Statistic in National Park. (in Thai)
  17. NESDB (2005) Thailand Input-Output Table.
  18. Pollution Control Department (2011) Report on Coastal Water Quality at Khao Laem Ya–Mu Koh Samet National Park 2005–2011 (in Thai)Google Scholar
  19. Thailand Authority of Thailand (2013) Two million million baht tourism revenue and market strategy. TAT Tourism Journal 3/2011 (in Thai). Accessed 13 January 2014
  20. Van Der Weide J (1993) A system view of integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manag 21(1–3):129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walski T, Parker F (1974) Consumer’s water quality index. J Environ Eng Div 100(3):593–611Google Scholar
  22. World Travel & Tourism Council (2014) Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2014: Thailand. Oxford Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phumthan Sirilersuang
    • 1
  • Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin
    • 2
  1. 1.BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations