Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 269–298 | Cite as

Evaluating the short-term cost of low-level local air pollution: a life satisfaction approach

  • Christopher Barrington-LeighEmail author
  • Fatemeh Behzadnejad
Research Article


To estimate the impact of air pollution on well-being, we combine a set of repeated cross-sectional surveys of individuals with high-resolution pollution and weather data. The respondents’ level of life satisfaction is modeled as a function of their socioeconomic characteristics and income as well as the weather and air pollution on the day of the survey interview. To overcome endogeneity problems, we include a set of high-resolution geographic fixed effects. Our analysis suggests that even after controlling for seasonal and local fixed effects, higher air pollution significantly reduces life satisfaction. The adverse effect of transient increases in air pollution is greater on individuals with poor health status. Estimating the average compensating differential between income and air pollution shows that the value of improving air quality by one-half standard deviation throughout the year is about 4.4 % of the average annual income of Canadians.


Life satisfaction Pollution Environmental valuation Compensating differential 


  1. Atkinson RW, Bremner SA, Anderson HR (1999) Short-term associations between emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular disease and outdoor air pollution in london. Arch Environ Health 54(6):398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrington-Leigh CP (2009) Geography, reference groups, and the determinants of life satisfaction, Ph.D. Thesis. University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. (reprinted: Oxford, Blackwell, 1948)Google Scholar
  4. Brereton F, Clinch JP, Ferreira S (2008) Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol Econ 65(2):386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullinger M (1989) Psychological effects of air pollution on healthy residents, a time-series approach. J Environ Psychol 9(2):103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2000) Willingness to pay for improved air quality in sweden. Appl Econ 32(6):661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CCME (2011) 2008–2009 progress report on the canada wide acid rain strategy for post 2000Google Scholar
  8. Chay KY, Greenstone M (2005) Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. J Polit Econ 113(2):376–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Depro B, Timmins C, O’Neil M (2015) White flight and coming to the nuisance: can residential mobility explain environmental injustice? J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 2(3):439–468Google Scholar
  10. Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2006) Some uses of happiness data in economics. J Econ Perspect 20:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2008) Gross national happiness as an answer to the easterlin paradox? J Dev Econ 86(1):22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond PA, Hausman JA (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J Econ Perspect 8(4):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95:542–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 29(1):94–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrhardt JJ, Saris WE, Veenhoven R (2000) Stability of life-satisfaction over time. J Happiness Studies 1(2):177–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feddersen J, Metcalfe R, Wooden M (2012) Subjective well-being: weather matters; climate doesn’t. Melbourne Institute Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferreira S, Moro M (2010) On the use of subjective well-being data for environmental valuation. Environ Resour Econ 46(3):249–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrer-i Carbonell A, Frijters P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J 114(497):641–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40(2):402–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey B, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2009) The life satisfaction approach to valuing public goods: the case of terrorism. Public Choice 138:317–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey BS, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2010) The life satisfaction approach to environmental valuation. Annu Rev Resour Econ 2(1):139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujita F, Diener E (2005) Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. J Person Soc Psychol 88(1):158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helliwell J, Wang S (2013) World happiness: trends, explanations, and distribution. In: Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) World Happiness Report, chapter 2. United Nations, pp 58–37Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman D (2000) Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach. Choices, values, and frames, pp 673–692Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL (1992) Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manag 22(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katsouyanni K, Touloumi G, Spix C, Schwartz J, Balducci F, Medina S, Rossi G, Wojtyniak B, Sunyer J, Bacharova L et al (1997) Short-term effects of ambient sulphur dioxide and particulate matter on mortality in 12 european cities: results from time series data from the aphea project. air pollution and health: a european approach. Br Med J 314(7095):1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelman M (2005) Hedonic psychology and the ambiguities of welfare. Philos Public Affairs 33(4):391–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levinson A (2012) Valuing public goods using happiness data: the case of air quality. J Public Econ 96(9–10):869–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luechinger S (2009) Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. Econ J 119(536):482–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luechinger S (2010) Life satisfaction and transboundary air pollution. Econ Lett 107(1):4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacKerron G (2011) Happiness economics from 35000 feet. J Econ Surveys 26:705–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKerron G, Mourato S (2009) Life satisfaction and air quality in london. Ecol Econ 68(5):1441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Partti-Pellinen K, Marttila O, Vilkka V, Jaakkola JJK, Jappinen P, Haahtela T (1996) The south karelia air pollution study: effects of low-level exposure to malodorous sulfur compounds on symptoms. Arch Environ Health 51(4):315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pavot W, Diener E (1993) Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol Assess 5(2):164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehdanz K, Maddison D (2008) Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in germany. Ecol Econ 64(4):787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rotton J (1983) Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 4(2):171–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwarz N, Strack F, Kommer D, Wagner D (1987) Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. Eur J Soc Psychol 17(1):69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarz N, Strack F (1991) Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. Subjective well-being: an interdisciplinary perspective, vol 21, pp 27–47Google Scholar
  39. Sumner LW (1996) Welfare, happiness and ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Szyszkowicz M (2008) Air pollution and daily emergency department visits for headache in Montreal, Canada. Headache 48(3):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vestreng V, Myhre G, Fagerli H, Reis S, Tarrason L et al (2007) Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in europe. Atmos Chem Phys 7(13):3663–3681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Welsch H (2002) Preferences over prosperity and pollution: environmental valuation based on happiness surveys. Kyklos 55(4):473–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Welsch H (2006) Environment and happiness: valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecol Econ 58(4):801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood J (2012) Canadian environmental indicators—air quality. Fraser Institute, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization (2006) Air quality guidelines: global update (2005) particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. Zivin JG, Neidell M (2013) Environment, health, and human capital. J Econ Lit 51(3):689–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Barrington-Leigh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatemeh Behzadnejad
    • 2
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.University of Liverpool Management SchoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations