Femoropopliteal Bypass: In Situ or Reversed Vein Grafts? Ten-Year Results of a Randomized Prospective Study

Abstract

One hundred femoropopliteal bypass procedures performed in 91 patients between October 1980 and January 1985 were randomly divided into two statistically comparable groups including 50 in situ vein grafts and 50 reversed vein grafts. The indication for bypass was chronic critical ischemia in 97% of cases. The lower anastomosis was made on the distal popliteal artery in 75% of cases. Follow-up ranged from 10 years (for the last patient included) to 14 years. Three patients have been lost to follow-up. Median survival was 54 months in the in situ graft group and 76.5 months in the reversed graft group. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 30.8% in the in situ graft group and 29.5% in the reversed graft group. Actuarial limb salvage at 10 years was 73.5% in the in situ graft group and 74.4% in the reversed graft group. Graft occlusion was observed in 10 cases during the perioperative period (six in the in situ graft group and four in the reversed graft group) and in 19 cases during the late postoperative period (12 in the in situ graft group and seven in the reversed graft group). Reoperation during follow-up was required in 13 cases in the in situ graft group (11 patients) and in nine cases in the reversed graft group (five patients). Discounting residual arteriovenous fistulas (FAV) (five ligations in four patients), the incidence of lesions involving the bypass and anastomoses threatening graft patency was 6% in the in situ graft group and 8% in the reversed graft group. Actuarial primary patency at 10 years was 41.7% in the in situ graft group and 64.5% in the reversed graft group (p < 0.05). Actuarial secondary patency at 10 years was 64.8% in the in situ graft group and 70.2% in the reversed graft group (NS). As a function of vein diameter, actuarial secondary patency at 10 years in the in situ graft group was 37.5% for bypasses using veins with a diameter of 4 mm or less and 80.6% for bypasses using veins larger than 4 mm (p < 0.05). In the reversed graft group the patency rate was 71.2% for bypasses using veins with a diameter of 4 mm or less and 65.5% for bypasses using veins larger than 4 mm. In addition to requiring a training period the in situ technique raises the problem of valve removal especially for small diameter veins. The absence of these disadvantages makes the reversed technique the procedure of choice for femoropopliteal bypass. (Ann Vasc Surg 1997;11:510–519.)