Skip to main content
Log in

Routine Shunting Is a Safe and Reliable Method of Cerebral Protection during Carotid Endarterectomy

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to describe the perioperative and long-term outcomes of standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with general anesthesia, routine shunting, and patching and to show that routine shunting is a safe and reliable method of cerebral protection. Between January 1998 and December 2004, 700 patients attending our Department of Vascular Surgery underwent 786 CEAs performed using a standardized technique. Forty-four patients were excluded from the analysis because they underwent combined CEA and coronary artery bypass grafting, so the analysis is based on the results of 742 CEAs in 656 patients (86 bilateral CEAs). The strict surgical protocol included general anesthesia and standard carotid bifurcation endarterectomy with routine shunting (Javid’s shunt) and Dacron patching. The Javid shunts were easily inserted in 738 cases (99.4%) but could not be used in four cases (0.5%) because of the presence of a very small internal carotid artery. The mean ischemic time required to insert the shunt and complete the suture was 4.7 min (±1.15), and the mean time to perform the endarterectomy was 34.3 min (±6.7). The mean follow-up was 24.4 months (±17.3). Overall 30-day mortality was 0.1% (one patient) due to a contralateral major stroke. The 1-month perioperative neurological complication rate was 0.7%, with three major and two minor strokes. The cumulative stroke and death rate was 0.8%. Preoperative symptoms such as hypertension, contralateral occlusion, or an age of more than 80 years were not independent risk factors for perioperative stroke. In the long-term follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated an estimated 5-year stroke-free rate of 98.0%. There were eight cases (1%) of >70% restenosis (four cases) or thrombosis (four cases) of the operated internal carotid artery during the follow-up in asymptomatic patients: in four cases, carotid stenting due to >70% restenosis led to good results. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the restenosis-free rate was 97.8%. The combined stroke and mortality rate of 0.8%, and the restenosis rate of 1% support the argument that standard CEA performed with routine shunting as brain protection leads to excellent early and long-term results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Stroke and Trauma Division. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators. Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1991;22:816–817.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endaretrectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491–1502.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rerkarsem K, Bond R, Rothwell PM. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD000126.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bond R, Rerkarsem K, Counsell C, Salinas R, Naylor R, Warlow C. Routine or selective shunting for carotid andarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;2:CD000190.

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Archie JP. A fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:724–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trisal V, Paulson T, Hans SS, Mittal V. Carotid artery restenosis: an ongoing disease process. Am Surg 2002;68:275–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango O, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial J Vasc Surg 2000;31:19–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooley D, Al-Naaman Y, Carton C. Surgical treatment of arteriosclerotic occlusion of common carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1956;13:500–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson J, Austin D, Patman R. Endarterectomy of the totally occluded carotid artery for stroke. Arch Surg 1967;95:791–801.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knighton JD, Stoneham MD. Carotid endarterectomy. A survey of UK anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia 2000;55:481–485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson JE. Carotid surgery: the past is prologue. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:131–138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riles TS, Imparato AM, Jacobowitz GR, et al. The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:206–216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman SG, Riles TS, Lamparello PJ, Imparato AM, Sakwa MP. Surgical therapy for the patient with internal carotid artery occlusion and contralateral stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:856–861.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies MJ, Mooney PH, Scott DA, et al. Neurologic changes during carotid endarterectomy under cervical block predict a high risk of postoperative stroke. Anaesthesiology 1993;78:829–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Archie JP Jr. Technique and clinical results of carotid stump back-pressure to determine selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:319–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frawley JE, Hicks RG, Beaudoin FR, Woodey FR. Hemodynamic ischemic stroke during carotid endarterectomy: an appraisal of risk and cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:611–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. (Sapphire trial). Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493–1501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah DM, Darling RC III, Chang BB, et al. Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability. Ann Surg 1998;228:471–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ecker RD, Pichelmann MA, Mark A, Meissner I, Meyer FB. Durability of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2003;34:2941–2944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hertzer NR, O’Hara PH, Mascha EJ, Krajewski LP, Sullivan TM, Beren EG. Early outcome assessment for 2228 consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1995. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaello Bellosta MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Bellosta, R., Luzzani, L., Carugati, C. et al. Routine Shunting Is a Safe and Reliable Method of Cerebral Protection during Carotid Endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 20, 482–487 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-006-9037-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-006-9037-8

Keywords

Navigation